Some thoughts about the future.
作者信息
Skinner B F
出版信息
J Exp Anal Behav. 1986 Mar;45(2):229-35. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1986.45-229.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Some thoughts about the future.关于未来的一些思考。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1986 Mar;45(2):229-35. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1986.45-229.
2
3
Determinants of choice.选择的决定因素。
Nebr Symp Motiv. 1982;29:69-127.
4
Animal cognition as the praxist views it.动物认知，正如实践主义所看待的那样。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1985 Winter;9(4):623-30. doi: 10.1016/0149-7634(85)90009-0.
5
Gestational exposure to methylmercury retards choice in transition in aging rats.孕期接触甲基汞会延缓老龄大鼠过渡阶段的选择能力。
Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2004 Mar-Apr;26(2):179-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ntt.2003.12.004.
6
Exploring a concurrent-chains paradox: decreasing preference as an initial link is shortened.探索并发链悖论：随着初始环节缩短偏好降低。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2005 Jan;31(1):3-17. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.31.1.3.
7
On some causes of behavioral contrast.论行为对比的某些原因。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 Sep;11(5):543-7. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-543.
8
Rapid acquisition of choice and timing in pigeons.鸽子对选择和时机的快速习得。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2007 Oct;33(4):392-408. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.33.4.392.
9
The matching law and effects of reinforcer rate and magnitude on choice in transition.匹配法则以及强化物比率和大小对转换选择的影响。
Behav Processes. 2008 Jun;78(2):210-6. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2007.12.003. Epub 2007 Dec 15.
10
Effect of signaling reinforcement on resistance to change in a multiple schedule.多重强化程序中信号强化对改变抗性的影响。
Behav Processes. 2007 Jan 10;74(1):33-48. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2006.09.009. Epub 2006 Sep 30.
引用本文的文献
1
Assessing cognitive flexibility in mice using a custom-built touchscreen chamber.使用定制的触摸屏实验箱评估小鼠的认知灵活性。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2025 Feb 13;19:1536458. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2025.1536458. eCollection 2025.
2
Choice Hygiene for "Consumer Neuroscientists"? Ethical Considerations and Proposals for Future Endeavours.“消费者神经科学家”的选择卫生学？伦理考量与未来努力建议。
Front Neurosci. 2022 Jun 13;15:612639. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.612639. eCollection 2021.
3
Who, What, and When: Skinner's Critiques of Neuroscience and His Main Targets.何人、何事、何时：斯金纳对神经科学的批判及其主要目标。
Behav Anal. 2016 Feb 11;39(2):197-218. doi: 10.1007/s40614-016-0053-x. eCollection 2016 Oct.
4
Do We Need the Environment to Explain Operant Behavior?我们需要环境来解释操作性行为吗？
Front Psychol. 2018 Mar 20;9:373. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00373. eCollection 2018.
5
The ultimate challenge: prove B. F. Skinner wrong.终极挑战：证明B. F. 斯金纳是错的。
Behav Anal. 2007 Fall;30(2):153-60. doi: 10.1007/BF03392152.
6
Varieties of scientific explanation.科学解释的种类。
Behav Anal. 2000 Fall;23(2):173-90. doi: 10.1007/BF03392009.
7
Behaviorism: Methodological, radical, assertive, skeptical, ethological, modest, humble, and evolving.行为主义：方法论的、激进的、坚定的、怀疑的、行为学的、适度的、谦逊的且不断演变的。
Behav Anal. 1991 Spring;14(1):43-7. doi: 10.1007/BF03392551.
8
Three conceptual units for behavior.行为的三个概念单元。
Behav Anal. 1987 Spring;10(1):17-26. doi: 10.1007/BF03392403.
9
An experimental analysis of ongoing verbal behavior: reinforcement, verbal operants, and superstitious behavior.对持续言语行为的实验分析：强化、言语操作和迷信行为。
Anal Verbal Behav. 1996;13:79-104. doi: 10.1007/BF03392908.
10
Dynamics of choice: relative rate and amount affect local preference at three different time scales.选择的动态变化：相对率和量在三个不同的时间尺度上影响局部偏好。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2009 May;91(3):293-317. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2009.91-293.
本文引用的文献
1
Are theories of learning necessary?学习理论是必要的吗？
Psychol Rev. 1950 Jul;57(4):193-216. doi: 10.1037/h0054367.
Zotero 插件