Suppr超能文献

引流术后发热和不发热的急性胆管炎患者抗菌治疗终止情况的比较。

Comparison of antimicrobial therapy termination in febrile and afebrile patients with acute cholangitis after drainage.

作者信息

Masuda Sakue, Imamura Yoshinori, Ichita Chikamasa, Jinushi Ryuhei, Kubota Jun, Kimura Karen, Makazu Makomo, Sato Ryo, Kako Makoto, Kobayashi Masahiro, Uojima Haruki, Taguri Masataka, Orihara Shunichiro, Koizumi Kazuya

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Medicine Center, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, 1370-1 Okamoto, Kamakura, Kanagawa, 247-8533, Japan.

Division of Medical Oncology/Hematology, Department of Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 1;14(1):17858. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-68999-z.

Abstract

The standard treatment duration for acute cholangitis (AC) involves a 4-7-day antimicrobial treatment post-biliary drainage; however, recent studies have suggested that a ≤ 2-3 days is sufficient. However, clinical practice frequently depends on body temperature as a criterion for discontinuing antimicrobial treatment. Therefore, in this study, we assessed whether patients with AC can achieve successful outcomes with a ≤ 7-day antimicrobial treatment, even with a fever, assuming the infection source is effectively controlled. We conducted a single-center retrospective study involving patients with AC, defined following the Tokyo Guidelines 2018 for any cause, who underwent successful biliary drainage and completed a ≤ 7-day antimicrobial treatment. Patients were categorized into the febrile and afebrile groups based on their body temperature within 24 h before completing antimicrobial treatment. The primary outcome was the clinical cure rate, defined as no initial presenting symptoms by day 14 post-biliary drainage without recurrence or death by day 30. The secondary outcome was a 3-month recurrence rate. Logistic regression with inverse probability of treatment weighting was used. Overall, 408 patients were selected, among whom 40 (9.8%) were febrile. The two groups showed no significant differences in the clinical cure and 3-month recurrence rates. Notably, the subgroups limited to patients with a ≤ 3-day antibiotic treatment duration also showed no differences in these outcomes. Therefore, our results suggest that discontinuing antibiotics within the initially planned treatment period was sufficient for successful drainage cases of AC, regardless of the patient's fever status during the 24 h leading up to termination.

摘要

急性胆管炎(AC)的标准治疗疗程包括在胆道引流后进行4 - 7天的抗菌治疗;然而,最近的研究表明,≤2 - 3天就足够了。然而,临床实践中常常以体温作为停止抗菌治疗的标准。因此,在本研究中,我们评估了AC患者在感染源得到有效控制的情况下,即使发烧,≤7天的抗菌治疗是否能取得成功的治疗效果。我们进行了一项单中心回顾性研究,纳入了符合2018年东京指南中任何病因定义的AC患者,这些患者接受了成功的胆道引流并完成了≤7天的抗菌治疗。根据完成抗菌治疗前24小时内的体温,将患者分为发热组和无发热组。主要结局是临床治愈率,定义为胆道引流后第14天无初始症状,且第30天无复发或死亡。次要结局是3个月复发率。采用治疗权重逆概率的逻辑回归分析。总体上,共入选408例患者,其中40例(9.8%)发热。两组在临床治愈率和3个月复发率方面无显著差异。值得注意的是,抗生素治疗疗程≤3天的亚组在这些结局方面也无差异。因此,我们的结果表明,对于AC成功引流的病例,在最初计划的治疗期内停用抗生素就足够了,无论在停药前24小时患者的发热状态如何。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab9a/11294559/71a2c49d6e3c/41598_2024_68999_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验