• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Understanding women's and men's perspectives on cervical cancer screening in Uganda: a qualitative study.了解乌干达女性和男性对宫颈癌筛查的看法:一项定性研究。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Aug 1;24(1):933. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12671-2.
2
Barriers and facilitators of cervical cancer screening literacy among rural women with HIV attending rural public health facilities in East Central Uganda: a qualitative study using the integrated model of health literacy.乌干达中东部农村公立卫生机构中感染艾滋病毒的农村妇女进行宫颈癌筛查的读写障碍因素和促进因素:使用健康素养综合模型的定性研究。
BMC Womens Health. 2024 Sep 9;24(1):498. doi: 10.1186/s12905-024-03340-4.
3
Knowledge, facilitators and barriers to cervical cancer screening among women in Uganda: a qualitative study.乌干达女性宫颈癌筛查的知识、促进因素和障碍:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 11;7(6):e016282. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016282.
4
"We Shall Tell them with Love, Inform them what we have Learnt and then Allow them to go" - Men's Perspectives of Self-Collected Cervical Cancer Screening in Rural Uganda: A Qualitative Inquiry.“我们要用爱去告诉她们,向她们传授我们所学到的知识,然后让她们自行决定”——乌干达农村地区男性对自我采集宫颈癌筛查的看法:一项定性研究。
J Cancer Educ. 2023 Apr;38(2):618-624. doi: 10.1007/s13187-022-02163-x. Epub 2022 Apr 6.
5
Barriers and facilitators to cervical cancer screening uptake among women in Nepal - a qualitative study.尼泊尔女性接受宫颈癌筛查的障碍和促进因素——一项定性研究。
Women Health. 2020 Oct;60(9):963-974. doi: 10.1080/03630242.2020.1781742. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
6
Perspectives of Screening-Eligible Women and Male Partners on Benefits of and Barriers to Treatment for Precancerous Lesions and Cervical Cancer in Kenya.肯尼亚筛查合格的女性及其男性伴侣对癌前病变和宫颈癌治疗的获益和障碍的看法。
Oncologist. 2018 Jan;23(1):35-43. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0053. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
7
Environmental and Psychosocial Barriers to and Benefits of Cervical Cancer Screening in Kenya.肯尼亚宫颈癌筛查的环境和社会心理障碍与益处
Oncologist. 2017 Feb;22(2):173-181. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0213. Epub 2017 Feb 6.
8
Understanding the role of embarrassment in gynaecological screening: a qualitative study from the ASPIRE cervical cancer screening project in Uganda.了解尴尬情绪在妇科筛查中的作用:来自乌干达ASPIRE宫颈癌筛查项目的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2014 Apr 11;4(4):e004783. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-004783.
9
Barriers and facilitators to cervical cancer screening in Nepal: A qualitative study.尼泊尔宫颈癌筛查的障碍和促进因素:一项定性研究。
Sex Reprod Healthc. 2019 Jun;20:20-26. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2019.02.001. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
10
Motivations and barriers to cervical cancer screening among HIV infected women in HIV care: a qualitative study.艾滋病护理中感染艾滋病毒女性宫颈癌筛查的动机与障碍:一项定性研究
BMC Womens Health. 2015 Oct 12;15:82. doi: 10.1186/s12905-015-0243-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Addressing Domestic Abuse Among Couples Experiencing Breast or Gynecologic Cancer in Africa.应对非洲乳腺癌或妇科癌症患者伴侣中的家庭虐待问题。
Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2025 May 19;29(3):257-263. doi: 10.1188/25.CJON.257-263.
2
Effects of a peer advocacy intervention on cervical cancer screening among social network members: results of a randomized controlled trial in Uganda.同伴倡导干预对社交网络成员宫颈癌筛查的影响:乌干达一项随机对照试验的结果。
J Behav Med. 2023 Dec;46(6):930-939. doi: 10.1007/s10865-023-00418-6. Epub 2023 Sep 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Drivers of cervical cancer prevention and management in sub-Saharan Africa: a qualitative synthesis of mixed studies.撒哈拉以南非洲地区宫颈癌预防和管理的驱动因素:混合研究的定性综合分析。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Feb 8;22(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-01094-3.
2
Effects of a peer advocacy intervention on cervical cancer screening among social network members: results of a randomized controlled trial in Uganda.同伴倡导干预对社交网络成员宫颈癌筛查的影响:乌干达一项随机对照试验的结果。
J Behav Med. 2023 Dec;46(6):930-939. doi: 10.1007/s10865-023-00418-6. Epub 2023 Sep 13.
3
Task-shifting for point-of-care cervical cancer prevention in low- and middle-income countries: a case study from Uganda.中低收入国家基于现场的宫颈癌预防任务转换:来自乌干达的案例研究。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jul 28;11:1105559. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1105559. eCollection 2023.
4
Barriers to cervical cancer and breast cancer screening uptake in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.中低收入国家宫颈癌和乳腺癌筛查接受度的障碍:系统评价。
Health Policy Plan. 2023 Apr 11;38(4):509-527. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czac104.
5
Social network-based group intervention to promote uptake of cervical cancer screening in Uganda: study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial.基于社交网络的群体干预措施促进乌干达宫颈癌筛查的开展:一项试点随机对照试验的研究方案
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2022 Dec 7;8(1):247. doi: 10.1186/s40814-022-01211-z.
6
"We Shall Tell them with Love, Inform them what we have Learnt and then Allow them to go" - Men's Perspectives of Self-Collected Cervical Cancer Screening in Rural Uganda: A Qualitative Inquiry.“我们要用爱去告诉她们,向她们传授我们所学到的知识,然后让她们自行决定”——乌干达农村地区男性对自我采集宫颈癌筛查的看法:一项定性研究。
J Cancer Educ. 2023 Apr;38(2):618-624. doi: 10.1007/s13187-022-02163-x. Epub 2022 Apr 6.
7
Women's lived experiences of advanced cervical cancer: a descriptive qualitative study.晚期宫颈癌患者的生活经历:一项描述性定性研究。
Int J Palliat Nurs. 2021 Nov 2;27(9):450-462. doi: 10.12968/ijpn.2021.27.9.450.
8
Barriers and facilitators to uptake of cervical cancer screening among women in Uganda: a systematic review.乌干达女性接受宫颈癌筛查的障碍和促进因素:系统评价。
BMC Womens Health. 2019 Aug 9;19(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12905-019-0809-z.
9
Perceptions and beliefs of lay people from northern Uganda regarding surgery for diagnosis and treatment of cervical cancer.乌干达北部非专业人士对宫颈癌的诊断和治疗手术的看法和信念。
Psychooncology. 2018 Aug;27(8):1965-1970. doi: 10.1002/pon.4751. Epub 2018 May 11.
10
Knowledge, facilitators and barriers to cervical cancer screening among women in Uganda: a qualitative study.乌干达女性宫颈癌筛查的知识、促进因素和障碍:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 11;7(6):e016282. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016282.

了解乌干达女性和男性对宫颈癌筛查的看法:一项定性研究。

Understanding women's and men's perspectives on cervical cancer screening in Uganda: a qualitative study.

机构信息

RAND Corporation, 1776 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA, 90411, USA.

School of Public Health, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.

出版信息

BMC Cancer. 2024 Aug 1;24(1):933. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12671-2.

DOI:10.1186/s12885-024-12671-2
PMID:39090654
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11293159/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cervical cancer remains a significant but preventable threat to women's health throughout much of the developing world, including Uganda. Cervical cancer screening and timely treatment of pre-cancerous lesions is a cost-effective means of mitigating cervical cancer morbidity and mortality. However, only 5% of women in Uganda have ever been screened. Barriers to screening, such as social stigma and access to safe conditions, have been previously identified, but insights into the role of male spouses in encouraging or discouraging screening have been limited. To our knowledge, no studies have compared barriers and facilitators among women who had or had not yet been screened and male partners of screened and unscreened women.

METHODS

To resolve this gap, we conducted 7 focus groups- 3 among women who had been screened, 3 among those who had not been screened, and 1 among men whose female partners had or had not been screened. We performed qualitative thematic analysis on the focus group data.

RESULTS

We identified several important factors impacting screening and the decision to screen among women, ranging from stigma, availability of screening, false beliefs around the procedure and side effects, and the role of spousal support in screening promotion. Male spousal perspectives for screening ranged from full support to hesitancy around male-performed exams and possible prolonged periods without intercourse.

CONCLUSION

This exploratory work demonstrates the importance of dialogue both among women and their male partners in enhancing screening uptake. Efforts to address screening uptake are necessary given that it is an important means of mitigating the burden of cervical cancer. Interventions along these lines need to take these barriers and facilitators into account in order to drive up demand for screening.

摘要

背景

在包括乌干达在内的许多发展中国家,宫颈癌仍然是对女性健康的重大但可预防的威胁。对宫颈癌进行筛查以及及时治疗癌前病变是减轻宫颈癌发病率和死亡率的一种具有成本效益的手段。然而,乌干达只有 5%的女性接受过筛查。先前已经确定了筛查的障碍,如社会耻辱感和获得安全条件的机会,但对男性配偶在鼓励或劝阻筛查方面的作用的了解有限。据我们所知,没有研究比较过已经接受过筛查和尚未接受过筛查的女性以及接受过筛查和未接受过筛查的女性的男性伴侣之间的障碍和促进因素。

方法

为了解决这一差距,我们进行了 7 个焦点小组的研究,其中 3 个是在已经接受过筛查的女性中进行的,3 个是在尚未接受过筛查的女性中进行的,1 个是在其女性伴侣已经接受过或尚未接受过筛查的男性中进行的。我们对焦点小组数据进行了定性主题分析。

结果

我们确定了一些影响女性筛查和决定筛查的重要因素,包括耻辱感、筛查的可获得性、对程序和副作用的错误信念以及配偶支持在筛查推广中的作用。男性配偶对筛查的看法从全力支持到对男性进行检查和可能长时间没有性生活的犹豫不等。

结论

这项探索性工作表明,在提高筛查率方面,女性及其男性伴侣之间进行对话非常重要。鉴于筛查是减轻宫颈癌负担的重要手段,因此有必要努力提高筛查率。为了提高对筛查的需求,此类干预措施需要考虑这些障碍和促进因素。