• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用快速诊断测试条作为病毒基因组监测的核糖核酸来源:以 SARS-CoV-2 为例。

Use of strips of rapid diagnostic tests as a source of ribonucleic acid for genomic surveillance of viruses: an example of SARS-CoV-2.

机构信息

Centre de Recherche et de Formation en Infectiologie de Guinée (CERFIG), Université Gamal Abder Nasser de Conakry, Conakry, Guinea.

Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), INSERM, TransVIHMI, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.

出版信息

Virol J. 2024 Aug 1;21(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s12985-024-02442-7.

DOI:10.1186/s12985-024-02442-7
PMID:39090721
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11295317/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to demonstrate that the genomic material of SARS-CoV-2 can be isolated from strips of COVID-19 rapid diagnostic test cassettes.

METHOD

It was a prospective cross-sectional study involving patients admitted to treatment centers and sampling sites in the city of Conakry, Guinea. A total of 121 patients were double sampled, and 9 more patients were tested only for RDT. PCR was conducted according to the protocol of the RunMei kit. Sequencing was performed by using the illumina COVIDSeq protocol. Nine COVID-19 RDTs without nasopharyngeal swabs were in addition tested.

RESULT

Among the 130 COVID-19 RDTs, forty-seven were macroscopically positive, whereas seventy-two were positive according to PCR using RDT strip, while among the 121 VTM swabs, sixty-four were positive. Among eighty-three negative COVID-19 RDTs, twenty-seven were positive by PCR using RDT strip with a geometric mean Ct value of 32.49 cycles. Compared to those of PCR using VTM, the sensitivity and specificity of PCR using RDT strip were estimated to be 100% and 85.96%, respectively, with 93.39% test accuracy. Among the fifteen COVID-19 RDT extracts eligible for sequencing, eleven had sequences identical to those obtained via the standard method, with coverage between 75 and 99.6%.

CONCLUSION

These results show that COVID-19 RDTs can be used as biological material for the genomic surveillance of SARS-CoV-2.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在证明可以从 COVID-19 快速诊断检测试剂盒的条带上分离出 SARS-CoV-2 的基因组物质。

方法

这是一项涉及几内亚科纳克里市治疗中心和采样点的患者的前瞻性横断面研究。总共对 121 名患者进行了双样本采集,另外对 9 名患者仅进行了 RDT 检测。PCR 按照 RunMei 试剂盒的方案进行。测序采用 illumina COVIDSeq 方案进行。此外,还对 9 个没有鼻咽拭子的 COVID-19 RDT 进行了测试。

结果

在 130 个 COVID-19 RDT 中,有 47 个宏观上呈阳性,而根据 RDT 条带的 PCR 有 72 个呈阳性,而在 121 个 VTM 拭子中,有 64 个呈阳性。在 83 个阴性 COVID-19 RDT 中,有 27 个通过 RDT 条带 PCR 呈阳性,几何平均 Ct 值为 32.49 个循环。与 VTM-PCR 相比,RDT 条带 PCR 的敏感性和特异性估计分别为 100%和 85.96%,检测准确率为 93.39%。在可用于测序的 15 个 COVID-19 RDT 提取物中,有 11 个与通过标准方法获得的序列相同,覆盖率在 75%至 99.6%之间。

结论

这些结果表明,COVID-19 RDT 可作为 SARS-CoV-2 基因组监测的生物材料。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f64a/11295317/4bcb846c04e5/12985_2024_2442_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f64a/11295317/95e9ea672371/12985_2024_2442_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f64a/11295317/f2968fb6e85d/12985_2024_2442_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f64a/11295317/4bcb846c04e5/12985_2024_2442_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f64a/11295317/95e9ea672371/12985_2024_2442_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f64a/11295317/f2968fb6e85d/12985_2024_2442_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f64a/11295317/4bcb846c04e5/12985_2024_2442_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Use of strips of rapid diagnostic tests as a source of ribonucleic acid for genomic surveillance of viruses: an example of SARS-CoV-2.使用快速诊断测试条作为病毒基因组监测的核糖核酸来源:以 SARS-CoV-2 为例。
Virol J. 2024 Aug 1;21(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s12985-024-02442-7.
2
Optimisation and evaluation of viral genomic sequencing of SARS-CoV-2 rapid diagnostic tests: a laboratory and cohort-based study.SARS-CoV-2 快速诊断检测病毒基因组测序的优化和评估:一项基于实验室和队列的研究。
Lancet Microbe. 2024 May;5(5):e468-e477. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(23)00399-3. Epub 2024 Apr 12.
3
Comparative evaluation of RT-PCR and antigen-based rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDTs) for SARS-CoV-2 detection: performance, variant specificity, and clinical implications.实时荧光 RT-PCR 与抗原检测试剂用于 SARS-CoV-2 检测的比较评估:性能、变异株特异性和临床意义。
Microbiol Spectr. 2024 Jun 4;12(6):e0007324. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00073-24. Epub 2024 Apr 29.
4
Bean Extract-Based Gargle for Efficient Diagnosis of Active COVID-19 Infection Using Rapid Antigen Tests.基于豆提取物的含漱液可用于使用快速抗原检测高效诊断活动性 COVID-19 感染。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Feb 23;10(1):e0161421. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01614-21. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
5
Diagnostic performance of CerTest and Panbio antigen rapid diagnostic tests to diagnose SARS-CoV-2 infection.用于诊断 SARS-CoV-2 感染的 CerTest 和 Panbio 抗原快速诊断检测的诊断性能。
J Clin Virol. 2021 Apr;137:104781. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2021.104781. Epub 2021 Feb 21.
6
Sensitivity and Specificity of SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Detection Tests Using Oral, Anterior Nasal, and Nasopharyngeal Swabs: a Diagnostic Accuracy Study.使用口腔、前鼻和鼻咽拭子的 SARS-CoV-2 快速抗原检测试验的敏感性和特异性:一项诊断准确性研究。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Feb 23;10(1):e0202921. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02029-21. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
7
Comparison between Nasal and Nasopharyngeal Swabs for SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Detection in an Asymptomatic Population, and Direct Confirmation by RT-PCR from the Residual Buffer.鼻拭子和咽拭子在无症状人群中用于 SARS-CoV-2 快速抗原检测的比较,以及从剩余缓冲液中用 RT-PCR 直接确认。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Feb 23;10(1):e0245521. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02455-21. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
8
The effect of sample site and collection procedure on identification of SARS-CoV-2 infection.样本采集部位和采集程序对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)感染鉴定的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 16;12(12):CD014780. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014780.
9
Diagnosis value of SARS-CoV-2 antigen/antibody combined testing using rapid diagnostic tests at hospital admission.入院时使用快速诊断检测进行 SARS-CoV-2 抗原/抗体联合检测的诊断价值。
J Med Virol. 2021 May;93(5):3069-3076. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26855. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
10
Comparative Diagnostic Utility of SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen and Molecular Testing in a Community Setting.社区环境中 SARS-CoV-2 快速抗原与分子检测的比较诊断效用。
J Infect Dis. 2024 Aug 16;230(2):363-373. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiae150.

引用本文的文献

1
Genomic and epidemiological analysis of SARS-CoV-2 variants isolated in Guinea: a routine sequencing implementation.在几内亚分离出的严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)变体的基因组和流行病学分析:一项常规测序实施情况
BMC Infect Dis. 2025 Jan 2;25(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-10411-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Emergence BQ.1 and BQ.1.1 as newly identified omicron subvariants: current scenario and future outlook - an update.新发现的奥密克戎亚变体BQ.1和BQ.1.1:当前情况与未来展望——最新进展
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023 Apr 6;85(4):1329-1330. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000000469. eCollection 2023 Apr.
2
Sequencing directly from antigen-detection rapid diagnostic tests in Belgium, 2022: a gamechanger in genomic surveillance?2022 年在比利时直接对抗原检测快速诊断检测进行测序:这是基因组监测的一个重大变化吗?
Euro Surveill. 2023 Mar;28(9). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2023.28.9.2200618.
3
Positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR of a nasal swab spot after 30 days of conservation on filter paper at room temperature.
室温下用滤纸保存 30 天后,鼻拭子点的 SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR 呈阳性。
J Med Virol. 2023 Jan;95(1):e28165. doi: 10.1002/jmv.28165. Epub 2022 Sep 29.
4
Evaluation of Alternative Transport Media for RT-qPCR-Based SARS-CoV-2 Testing.基于逆转录定量聚合酶链反应(RT-qPCR)的新型冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)检测的替代运输介质评估
Int J Anal Chem. 2022 Aug 10;2022:5020255. doi: 10.1155/2022/5020255. eCollection 2022.
5
Performance Evaluation of the STANDARD Q COVID-19 and Panbio COVID-19 Antigen Tests in Detecting SARS-CoV-2 during High Transmission Period in Mozambique.莫桑比克高传播期内STANDARD Q COVID-19和Panbio COVID-19抗原检测在检测严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2中的性能评估
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Feb 12;12(2):475. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12020475.
6
Allelic Diversity: A Comparison of DNA Extraction from Isolates Collected on Rapid Diagnostic Tests (Rdts) and Filter Paper.等位基因多样性:对通过快速诊断检测(RDTs)收集的分离株与滤纸上提取的DNA进行比较。
Iran J Parasitol. 2021 Oct-Dec;16(4):555-559. doi: 10.18502/ijpa.v16i4.7867.
7
Performance of an alternative RT-PCR procedure using residual sample from the Panbio™ Ag COVID-19 test.使用 Panbio™ Ag COVID-19 检测的剩余样本进行替代 RT-PCR 检测的性能。
Braz J Infect Dis. 2021 Sep-Oct;25(5):101630. doi: 10.1016/j.bjid.2021.101630. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
8
Comparative analysis of various clinical specimens in detection of SARS-CoV-2 using rRT-PCR in new and follow up cases of COVID-19 infection: Quest for the best choice.比较分析新冠病毒感染新发病例和随访病例中使用 rRT-PCR 检测时各种临床标本:探索最佳选择。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 5;16(4):e0249408. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249408. eCollection 2021.
9
Challenges of SARS-CoV-2 genomic surveillance in Africa.非洲新冠病毒基因组监测面临的挑战。
Lancet Microbe. 2021 Apr;2(4):e139. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(21)00065-3. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
10
Diagnostics for SARS-CoV-2 infections.用于 SARS-CoV-2 感染的诊断方法。
Nat Mater. 2021 May;20(5):593-605. doi: 10.1038/s41563-020-00906-z. Epub 2021 Feb 15.