Hayes Aoife, Courey Lynn, Kells Mary, Hyndman Doreen, Dempsey Maria, Murphy Mike
School of Applied Psychology, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Mental Health Services, Cork Kerry Community Healthcare, Health Service Executive, Cork, Ireland.
Fam Process. 2024 Dec;63(4):2119-2134. doi: 10.1111/famp.13042. Epub 2024 Aug 1.
Burden and psychological distress are higher in informal caregivers (ICs) of people with severe emotional and behavior dysregulation who have been given a diagnosis of borderline personality disorder (BPD) compared with non-caregivers. The current cross-sectional study examines the difference in outcomes of ICs of people with BPD who have received the intervention Family Connections (FC) and who also led interventions for other caregivers (caregiver-leaders) compared with those who have attended FC but not led caregiver interventions (non-leader-FC participants). The sample for this research is from a larger study (Hayes et al., 2023, Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation, 10, 31). Data for 347 participants who self-reported receiving FC and completed the McLean Screening Instrument for BPD-Carer Version, the Brief COPE, the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support, the Kessler Psychological Distress scale, the WHO-5 Well-being Index, and the Coronavirus Anxiety Scale were analyzed. The results found that being a caregiver-leader was associated with higher positive mental well-being and lower psychological distress compared with non-leader-FC participants. Being a caregiver-leader was also associated with significantly greater use of the coping strategy of positive reframing and lower use of behavioral disengagement and self-blame than non-leader-FC participants. The study provides preliminary evidence that for those who have received FC, becoming an intervention leader is associated with better outcomes than caregivers who do not become leaders and provides support for caregiver-led rollout of FC across services.
与非照料者相比,被诊断患有边缘性人格障碍(BPD)且存在严重情绪和行为失调的患者的非正式照料者(ICs)负担和心理困扰更高。当前的横断面研究考察了接受“家庭联系”(FC)干预且还为其他照料者开展干预的BPD患者的ICs(照料者领导者)与参加了FC但未开展照料者干预的人(非领导者-FC参与者)在结果上的差异。本研究样本来自一项更大规模的研究(海斯等人,2023年,《边缘性人格障碍与情绪失调》,第10卷第31期)。对347名自我报告接受FC并完成了《麦克莱恩BPD照料者版筛查工具》、《简易应对方式问卷》、《领悟社会支持多维量表》、《凯斯勒心理困扰量表》、《WHO-5幸福指数》和《冠状病毒焦虑量表》的参与者的数据进行了分析。结果发现,与非领导者-FC参与者相比,作为照料者领导者与更高的积极心理健康水平和更低的心理困扰相关。作为照料者领导者与比非领导者-FC参与者更多地使用积极重新评价的应对策略以及更少地使用行为脱离和自责也相关。该研究提供了初步证据,即对于那些接受了FC的人来说,成为干预领导者比未成为领导者的照料者有更好的结果,并为跨服务领域由照料者主导推行FC提供了支持。