Guo Pingping, Lin Yufeng, Sheng Yifei, Gu Xuan, Deng Yijuan, Zhang Yamian, Wang Wenqing, Wang Mao
Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education for Coastal and Wetland Ecosystems, College of the Environment & Ecology Xiamen University Xiamen China.
Zhangjiang Estuary Mangrove Wetland Ecosystem Station, National Observation and Research Station for the Taiwan Strait Marine Ecosystem Xiamen University Zhangzhou China.
Ecol Evol. 2024 Jul 31;14(8):e70069. doi: 10.1002/ece3.70069. eCollection 2024 Aug.
The abandoned pond-to-mangrove restoration project provides greater advantages than tidal flats afforestation in restoring mangrove ecosystem services and will be the primary method for mangrove restoration in the future. The existing methods for abandoned pond-to-mangrove restoration include artificial restoration through 'dike-breaking, filling with imported soil and tree planting' and natural restoration through 'dike-breaking and natural succession'. However, little is known about which restoration strategy (natural or artificial restoration) provides more benefits to the biodiversity of mangrove macrobethos. Given a prevailing view suggested that artificial restoration should be the preferred approach for accelerating recovery of biodiversity and vegetation structure in tropical regions, we hypothesised higher macrobenthic biodiversity and more complex community structure in artificial restoration than in natural restoration. To test this hypothesis, macrobenthic biodiversity and ecological processes were monitored in a typical abandoned pond-to-mangrove area of Dongzhaigang Bay, China, where artificial and natural restoration methods were used concurrently. Differences in macrobenthic biodiversity, community structure and ecological processes were compared using diversity indices, complex network analysis and null models. Similar species composition and ecological niche overlap and width among macrobenthos were observed at artificial and natural restoration sites. The biotic heterogeneity and interaction among macrobenthos were higher at the natural restoration sites than at the artificial restoration sites. Macrobenthos community assembly at natural and artificial restoration sites was both determined by deterministic processes, with environmental filtering dominating, which explained 52% and 54% of the variations in macrobenthic community structures respectively. Although our findings did not validate the research hypothesis, higher biotic heterogeneity and species interaction among macrobenthos could support natural restoration as the primary method for abandoned pond-to-mangrove projects, because it is a nature-based solution for mangrove restoration.
废弃池塘至红树林恢复项目在恢复红树林生态系统服务方面比潮滩造林具有更大优势,将成为未来红树林恢复的主要方法。现有的废弃池塘至红树林恢复方法包括通过“破堤、填客土和植树”进行人工恢复以及通过“破堤和自然演替”进行自然恢复。然而,对于哪种恢复策略(自然恢复或人工恢复)能为红树林大型底栖生物的生物多样性带来更多益处,人们了解甚少。鉴于一种普遍观点认为人工恢复应是加速热带地区生物多样性和植被结构恢复的首选方法,我们假设人工恢复中大型底栖生物的生物多样性更高,群落结构更复杂。为验证这一假设,在中国东寨港湾一个典型的废弃池塘至红树林区域,同时采用人工和自然恢复方法,对大型底栖生物的生物多样性和生态过程进行了监测。使用多样性指数、复杂网络分析和零模型比较了大型底栖生物多样性、群落结构和生态过程的差异。在人工恢复和自然恢复地点观察到大型底栖生物的物种组成、生态位重叠和宽度相似。自然恢复地点大型底栖生物之间的生物异质性和相互作用高于人工恢复地点。自然和人工恢复地点的大型底栖生物群落组装均由确定性过程决定,环境过滤起主导作用,分别解释了大型底栖生物群落结构变异的52%和54%。尽管我们的研究结果未验证研究假设,但大型底栖生物之间更高的生物异质性和物种相互作用可以支持将自然恢复作为废弃池塘至红树林项目的主要方法,因为这是一种基于自然的红树林恢复解决方案。