Li Yanhua, Wang Youquan, Chen Bin, Zhang Zhe, Zhang Dong
Department of Critical Care Medicine, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Department of Nephrology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Front Nutr. 2024 Jul 18;11:1359409. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1359409. eCollection 2024.
To evaluate and explore the feasibility of using quality control indicators for nutritional therapy in critically ill patients as quality evaluation criteria.
This study focused on intensive care unit (ICU) critically ill patients and conducted a cross-sectional investigation of nutritional therapy quality control indicators (the proportion of patients with application of enteral nutrition pump, nutritional risk assessment rate, the proportion of patients start enteral nutrition within 48 hours, and caloric and protein target achievement rate on 7th day) in 13 hospitals in Jilin Province. After training according to the critical patients nutrition related guidelines and the latest literatures, a second cross-sectional investigation was conducted. Then, analyze the improvement of quality control indicators of the nutritional therapy before and after the training, thus evaluating the feasibility of using these quality control indicators as nutritional therapy quality evaluation criteria in critical patients.
(1) A total of 631 patients were included before and after training, with a data acquisition rate of 97.3% for enteral nutrition pumps usage and complete data collection for the remaining nutritional risk assessment rate, start enteral nutrition proportion of patients within 48 h, and caloric and protein target achievement rate on 7th day. (2) The nutritional risk assessment rate before and after training was 88.2% vs. 94.8%, with a -value of 0.003. The proportion of patients start enteral nutrition within 48 h before and after training was 65.1% vs. 75.4%, with a -value of 0.039; and protein target achievement rate on 7th day before and after training was 64.6% vs. 79.6%, with a -value of 0.015. These five indicators as quality evaluation criteria are relevant to the current developments in nutritional therapy and consistent with the national conditions of China. The proportion of patients with application of enteral nutrition pump before and after training was 70.1% vs. 79.4%, with a -value of 0.065, and the caloric target achievement rate on 7th day before and after training was 73.4% vs. 83.9%, with a -value of 0.062, and there was no statistical difference between the two groups.
The five quality control indicators for nutritional therapy in critically ill patients are clinically feasible and can be used as quality evaluation criteria for nutritional therapy in critically ill patients.
评估并探讨将危重症患者营养治疗质量控制指标作为质量评价标准的可行性。
本研究聚焦于重症监护病房(ICU)的危重症患者,对吉林省13家医院的营养治疗质量控制指标(肠内营养泵使用患者比例、营养风险评估率、48小时内开始肠内营养患者比例以及第7天热量和蛋白质目标达成率)进行横断面调查。依据危重症患者营养相关指南及最新文献进行培训后,开展第二次横断面调查。随后,分析培训前后营养治疗质量控制指标的改善情况,从而评估将这些质量控制指标作为危重症患者营养治疗质量评价标准的可行性。
(1)培训前后共纳入631例患者,肠内营养泵使用情况的数据采集率为97.3%,其余营养风险评估率、48小时内开始肠内营养患者比例以及第7天热量和蛋白质目标达成率的数据收集完整。(2)培训前后营养风险评估率分别为88.2%和94.8%,P值为0.003。培训前后48小时内开始肠内营养患者比例分别为65.1%和75.4%,P值为0.039;第7天蛋白质目标达成率分别为64.6%和79.6%,P值为0.015。这五项指标作为质量评价标准与当前营养治疗发展相关且符合中国国情。培训前后肠内营养泵使用患者比例分别为70.1%和79.4%,P值为0.065,第7天热量目标达成率分别为73.4%和83.9%,P值为0.062,两组间无统计学差异。
危重症患者营养治疗的五项质量控制指标在临床上可行,可作为危重症患者营养治疗的质量评价标准。