• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用多光谱传感器估算玉米光合有效辐射吸收比例和净光合速率的机器学习方法

Machine learning approaches for estimation of the fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation and net photosynthesis rate of maize using multi-spectral sensor.

作者信息

Parida Pradosh Kumar, Eagan Somasundaram, Ramanujam Krishnan, Sengodan Radhamani, Uthandi Sivakumar, Ettiyagounder Parameswari, Rajagounder Raja

机构信息

Department of Agronomy, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, 641003, Tamil Nadu, India.

Directorate of Agribusiness Development (DABD), Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, 641003, Tamil Nadu, India.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2024 Jul 4;10(13):e34117. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34117. eCollection 2024 Jul 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34117
PMID:39091949
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11292552/
Abstract

The fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation (FAPAR) and the photosynthesis rate (Pn) of maize canopies were identified as essential photosynthetic parameters for accurately estimating vegetation growth and productivity using multispectral vegetation indices (VIs). Despite their importance, few studies have compared the effectiveness of multispectral imagery and various machine learning techniques in estimating these photosynthetic traits under high vegetation coverage. In this study, seventeen multispectral VIs and four machine learning (ML) algorithms were utilized to determine the most suitable model for estimating maize FAPAR and Pn during the and seasons at Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, India. Results demonstrate that indices such as OSAVI, SAVI, EVI-2, and MSAVI-2 during the and MNDVIRE and MSRRE during the season outperformed others in estimating FAPAR and Pn values. Among the four ML methods of random forest (RF), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), support vector regression (SVR), and multiple linear regression (MLR) considered, RF consistently showed the most effective fitting effect and XGBoost demonstrated the least fitting accuracy for FAPAR and Pn estimation. However, SVR with R = 0.873 and RMSE = 0.045 during the and MLR with R = 0.838 and RMSE = 0.053 during the season demonstrated higher fitting accuracy, particularly notable for FAPAR prediction. Similarly, in the prediction of Pn, MLR showed higher fitting accuracy with R = 0.741 and RMSE = 2.531 during the and R = 0.955 and RMSE = 1.070 during the season. This study demonstrated the potential of combining UAV-derived VIs with ML to develop accurate FAPAR and Pn prediction models, overcoming VI saturation in dense vegetation. It underscores the importance of optimizing these models to improve the accuracy of maize vegetation assessments during various growing seasons.

摘要

吸收的光合有效辐射比例(FAPAR)和玉米冠层的光合速率(Pn)被确定为利用多光谱植被指数(VIs)准确估算植被生长和生产力的关键光合参数。尽管它们很重要,但很少有研究比较多光谱图像和各种机器学习技术在高植被覆盖下估算这些光合特征的有效性。在本研究中,利用17种多光谱植被指数和4种机器学习(ML)算法,在印度哥印拜陀的泰米尔纳德邦农业大学,确定了估算玉米FAPAR和Pn在两个季节期间最合适的模型。结果表明,在第一季中,如OSAVI、SAVI、EVI - 2和MSAVI - 2等指数,以及在第二季中MNDVIRE和MSRRE等指数,在估算FAPAR和Pn值方面优于其他指数。在所考虑的随机森林(RF)、极端梯度提升(XGBoost)、支持向量回归(SVR)和多元线性回归(MLR)这四种ML方法中,RF始终显示出最有效的拟合效果,而XGBoost在FAPAR和Pn估算方面显示出最低的拟合精度。然而,第一季中R = 0.873且RMSE = 0.045的SVR和第二季中R = 0.838且RMSE = 0.053的MLR显示出更高的拟合精度,特别是在FAPAR预测方面尤为显著。同样,在Pn预测中,MLR在第一季中R = 0.741且RMSE = 2.531,在第二季中R = 0.955且RMSE = 1.070时显示出更高的拟合精度。本研究证明了将无人机获取的植被指数与机器学习相结合,以开发准确的FAPAR和Pn预测模型的潜力,克服了茂密植被中植被指数的饱和问题。它强调了优化这些模型对于提高不同生长季节玉米植被评估准确性的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46d9/11292552/f1be7ad04e8b/gr8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46d9/11292552/fc1428055270/ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46d9/11292552/5714625ca4e9/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46d9/11292552/1ec306b9fb1d/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46d9/11292552/57ea2894e087/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46d9/11292552/8b20cd8a473a/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46d9/11292552/b808fac331c2/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46d9/11292552/150aeaecb5db/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46d9/11292552/088dde8cdc67/gr7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46d9/11292552/f1be7ad04e8b/gr8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46d9/11292552/fc1428055270/ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46d9/11292552/5714625ca4e9/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46d9/11292552/1ec306b9fb1d/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46d9/11292552/57ea2894e087/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46d9/11292552/8b20cd8a473a/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46d9/11292552/b808fac331c2/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46d9/11292552/150aeaecb5db/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46d9/11292552/088dde8cdc67/gr7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46d9/11292552/f1be7ad04e8b/gr8.jpg

相似文献

1
Machine learning approaches for estimation of the fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation and net photosynthesis rate of maize using multi-spectral sensor.利用多光谱传感器估算玉米光合有效辐射吸收比例和净光合速率的机器学习方法
Heliyon. 2024 Jul 4;10(13):e34117. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34117. eCollection 2024 Jul 15.
2
[Fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation over summer maize canopy estimated by hyperspectral remote sensing under different drought conditions.].不同干旱条件下基于高光谱遥感估算的夏玉米冠层光合有效辐射吸收比例
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2019 Jun;30(6):2021-2029. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201906.041.
3
Retrieving rice ( L.) net photosynthetic rate from UAV multispectral images based on machine learning methods.基于机器学习方法从无人机多光谱图像中反演水稻净光合速率。
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Jan 25;13:1088499. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1088499. eCollection 2022.
4
Combining spectral and texture feature of UAV image with plant height to improve LAI estimation of winter wheat at jointing stage.结合无人机图像的光谱和纹理特征与株高以改进拔节期冬小麦叶面积指数的估算
Front Plant Sci. 2024 Jan 3;14:1272049. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1272049. eCollection 2023.
5
An algorithm to derive the fraction of photosynthetically active radiation absorbed by photosynthetic elements of the canopy (FAPAR(ps)) from eddy covariance flux tower data.从涡度相关通量塔数据推导出冠层光合元素吸收的光合有效辐射分数(FAPAR(ps))的算法。
New Phytol. 2013 Jan;197(2):511-523. doi: 10.1111/nph.12039. Epub 2012 Nov 22.
6
Above-Ground Biomass Estimation in Oats Using UAV Remote Sensing and Machine Learning.利用无人机遥感和机器学习估算燕麦地上生物量。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Jan 13;22(2):601. doi: 10.3390/s22020601.
7
Utilizing Spectral, Structural and Textural Features for Estimating Oat Above-Ground Biomass Using UAV-Based Multispectral Data and Machine Learning.利用基于无人机的多光谱数据和机器学习的光谱、结构和纹理特征估算燕麦地上生物量。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Dec 8;23(24):9708. doi: 10.3390/s23249708.
8
A New Vegetation Index Infusing Visible-Infrared Spectral Absorption Feature for Natural Grassland FAPAR Retrieval.一种融入可见-红外光谱吸收特征的新型植被指数用于天然草地FAPAR反演
Guang Pu Xue Yu Guang Pu Fen Xi. 2017 Mar;37(3):859-64.
9
Machine learning for high-throughput field phenotyping and image processing provides insight into the association of above and below-ground traits in cassava ( Crantz).用于高通量田间表型分析和图像处理的机器学习为木薯(Crantz)地上和地下性状的关联提供了见解。
Plant Methods. 2020 Jun 14;16:87. doi: 10.1186/s13007-020-00625-1. eCollection 2020.
10
Land potential assessment and trend-analysis using 2000-2021 FAPAR monthly time-series at 250 m spatial resolution.利用 2000-2021 年每月 FAPAR 时间序列数据(空间分辨率为 250 米)进行土地潜力评估和趋势分析。
PeerJ. 2024 Mar 13;12:e16972. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16972. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Scaling Effects on Chlorophyll Content Estimations with RGB Camera Mounted on a UAV Platform Using Machine-Learning Methods.基于机器学习的无人机 RGB 相机叶绿素含量估算的尺度效应。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Sep 9;20(18):5130. doi: 10.3390/s20185130.
2
Retrieving the Diurnal FPAR of a Maize Canopy from the Jointing Stage to the Tasseling Stage with Vegetation Indices under Different Water Stresses and Light Conditions.在不同水分和光照条件下,利用植被指数反演玉米从拔节期到抽雄期的日 FPAR。
Sensors (Basel). 2018 Nov 15;18(11):3965. doi: 10.3390/s18113965.
3
Estimation of the fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation (fPAR) in maize canopies using LiDAR data and hyperspectral imagery.
利用激光雷达数据和高光谱图像估算玉米冠层吸收的光合有效辐射(fPAR)份额。
PLoS One. 2018 May 29;13(5):e0197510. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197510. eCollection 2018.
4
Alpine vegetation phenology dynamic over 16years and its covariation with climate in a semi-arid region of China.16 年来阿尔卑斯植被物候动态及其与中国半干旱地区气候的变化关系。
Sci Total Environ. 2016 Dec 1;572:119-128. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.206. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
5
Global and time-resolved monitoring of crop photosynthesis with chlorophyll fluorescence.利用叶绿素荧光进行全球和时间分辨的作物光合作用监测。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Apr 8;111(14):E1327-33. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1320008111. Epub 2014 Mar 25.
6
Wide Dynamic Range Vegetation Index for remote quantification of biophysical characteristics of vegetation.用于植被生物物理特征遥感定量的宽动态范围植被指数。
J Plant Physiol. 2004 Feb;161(2):165-73. doi: 10.1078/0176-1617-01176.