• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

韩国关于药品报销标准的公共价值判断。

Public value judgments about the criteria for reimbursement of medicines in South Korea.

作者信息

Son Kyung-Bok

机构信息

College of Pharmacy, Hanyang University, Ansan, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea.

出版信息

Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2025 Jan;25(1):53-61. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2024.2388815. Epub 2024 Aug 6.

DOI:10.1080/14737167.2024.2388815
PMID:39093034
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study quantified the public value (PV) of the criteria and sub-criteria in the current drug reimbursement systems in South Korea and examined sociodemographic factors that associated with PV.

METHODS

The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) was used to quantify the PVs of criteria and sub-criteria. We developed a questionnaire to generate pairwise comparison matrices among criteria and sub-criteria. From 27 March to 1 April 2023, we recruited 1,000 study participants using a quota sampling method stratified by age, sex, and region based on Korean census data.

RESULTS

The PVs for the criteria were highest for clinical usefulness (28.5%), followed by cost-effectiveness (27.1%), budget impact (24.3%), and reimbursement in other countries (20.1%). The sociodemographic characteristics of the participants had a significant impact on the PVs of the criteria. Willingness to pay additional premiums for national health insurance was negatively associated with PV for clinical usefulness and cost-effectiveness and positively associated with PV for reimbursement in other countries.

CONCLUSIONS

The public prioritized clinical usefulness and cost-effectiveness as the main criteria. However, the PVs of the criteria were divergent and associated with sociodemographic factors. Divergent public interests require an evidence-informed deliberative process for reimbursement decisions.

摘要

目的

本研究对韩国现行药品报销系统中标准和子标准的公共价值(PV)进行了量化,并考察了与公共价值相关的社会人口学因素。

方法

采用层次分析法(AHP)对标准和子标准的公共价值进行量化。我们编制了一份问卷,以生成标准和子标准之间的成对比较矩阵。2023年3月27日至4月1日,我们基于韩国人口普查数据,采用按年龄、性别和地区分层的配额抽样方法招募了1000名研究参与者。

结果

各标准的公共价值中,临床实用性最高(28.5%),其次是成本效益(27.1%)、预算影响(24.3%)和其他国家的报销情况(20.1%)。参与者的社会人口学特征对标准的公共价值有显著影响。愿意为国民健康保险支付额外保费与临床实用性和成本效益的公共价值呈负相关,与其他国家报销情况的公共价值呈正相关。

结论

公众将临床实用性和成本效益作为主要标准。然而,这些标准的公共价值存在差异,并与社会人口学因素相关。不同的公共利益要求在报销决策过程中采用基于证据的审议程序。

相似文献

1
Public value judgments about the criteria for reimbursement of medicines in South Korea.韩国关于药品报销标准的公共价值判断。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2025 Jan;25(1):53-61. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2024.2388815. Epub 2024 Aug 6.
2
Eliciting societal preferences of reimbursement decision criteria for anti cancer drugs in South Korea.探究韩国抗癌药物报销决策标准的社会偏好。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2017 Aug;17(4):411-419. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2017.1277144. Epub 2017 Jan 3.
3
Eight-year experience of using HTA in drug reimbursement: South Korea.韩国药物报销中应用卫生技术评估的八年经验
Health Policy. 2016 Jun;120(6):612-20. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2016.03.013. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
4
Evaluation on the first 2 years of the positive list system in South Korea.韩国“肯定列表制度”实施 2 年评价
Health Policy. 2012 Jan;104(1):32-9. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2011.09.006. Epub 2011 Oct 15.
5
Role of economic evidence in coverage decision-making in South Korea.韩国医保覆盖决策中的经济证据的作用。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 24;13(10):e0206121. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206121. eCollection 2018.
6
Economic evaluation and pharmaceutical reimbursement reform in South Korea's National Health Insurance.韩国国民健康保险中的经济评估与药品报销改革。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2008 Jan-Feb;27(1):179-87. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.1.179.
7
Drug reimbursement decision-making in Thailand, China, and South Korea.泰国、中国和韩国的药品报销决策。
Value Health. 2012 Jan-Feb;15(1 Suppl):S120-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.11.002.
8
National reimbursement listing determinants of new cancer drugs: a retrospective analysis of 58 cancer treatment appraisals in 2007-2016 in South Korea.国家癌症新药报销目录的决定因素:对2007 - 2016年韩国58项癌症治疗评估的回顾性分析。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2017 Aug;17(4):401-409. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2017.1276828. Epub 2017 Jan 3.
9
Reimbursement and pricing of regenerative medicine in South Korea: key factors for achieving reimbursement.韩国再生医学的报销和定价:实现报销的关键因素。
Regen Med. 2020 Apr;15(4):1550-1560. doi: 10.2217/rme-2020-0035. Epub 2020 May 1.
10
Rheumatoid arthritis patients fulfilling Korean National Health Insurance reimbursement guidelines for anti-tumor necrosis factor-α treatment and comparison to other guidelines.符合韩国国民健康保险抗肿瘤坏死因子-α治疗报销指南的类风湿性关节炎患者及其与其他指南的比较。
Rheumatol Int. 2015 Nov;35(11):1817-23. doi: 10.1007/s00296-015-3353-7. Epub 2015 Sep 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Public perceptions of high-cost cancer drugs and the implications for reimbursement decisions.公众对高成本抗癌药物的认知及其对报销决策的影响。
Health Econ Rev. 2025 Jul 12;15(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s13561-025-00659-y.