• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

托珠单抗与甲氨蝶呤相比可更快实现巨细胞动脉炎的无类固醇缓解:两个参考中心的真实经验。

Faster steroid-free remission with tocilizumab compared to methotrexate in giant cell arteritis: a real-life experience in two reference centres.

机构信息

Rheumatology Division, Department of Medicine (DMED), University of Udine, Udine, Italy.

Institute of Statistics, Department of Medicine (DMED), University of Udine, Udine, Italy.

出版信息

Intern Emerg Med. 2024 Nov;19(8):2177-2184. doi: 10.1007/s11739-024-03722-4. Epub 2024 Aug 2.

DOI:10.1007/s11739-024-03722-4
PMID:39093541
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11582127/
Abstract

Glucocorticoids (GCs) are still the mainstay of treatment of giant cell arteritis (GCA). Although GCs are highly effective in GCA, the high burden of toxicity of GCs as well as the disease relapse during GC tapering is well documented. To compare the efficacy and rapidity of TCZ and MTX as steroid-sparing agents in a real-life cohort of GCA patients. A retrospective analysis was conducted including patients with newly diagnosed GCA from the Rheumatology Units of Udine and Rome. The inclusion criterion was the treatment with TCZ or MTX as first steroid-sparing drug. 112 GCA patients (81 females) with a median age of 70 (IQ 65-75) years were collected. Thirty-one out of 112 (27.7%) patients were treated with TCZ (162 mg/week), while 81/112 (72.3%) patients received MTX (up to 20 mg/week) as a GC-sparing agent. At month 6 after GCA onset, 5/31 (16.1%) patients in TCZ group and none in MTX group were in GC-free sustained remission (p value = 0.001). Similarly, at month 12, 64.5% (20/31) and 11.1% (9/81) of patients were in sustained GC-free remission in TCZ and MTX group, respectively (p value <0.001). At month 24 of follow-up, at least one relapse of the disease occurred in 7/31 (22.6%) in TCZ-treated and 28/81 (34.6%) in MTX-treated patients, respectively (p value = 0.22). TCZ allowed a faster discontinuation of steroid therapy than MTX in GCA patients, without increasing the risk of relapse.

摘要

糖皮质激素(GCs)仍然是巨细胞动脉炎(GCA)治疗的主要药物。虽然 GCs 在 GCA 中非常有效,但 GCs 的毒性负担高以及在 GC 减量过程中疾病复发的情况已有充分记录。为了比较托珠单抗(TCZ)和甲氨蝶呤(MTX)作为 GCA 患者类固醇维持治疗药物的疗效和起效速度,我们进行了一项回顾性分析,纳入了来自乌迪内和罗马风湿病科的新诊断为 GCA 的患者。纳入标准是使用 TCZ 或 MTX 作为一线类固醇维持治疗药物。共纳入 112 例(81 例女性)GCA 患者,中位年龄为 70 岁(IQR 65-75 岁)。112 例患者中有 31 例(27.7%)接受 TCZ(162mg/周)治疗,81 例(72.3%)接受 MTX(最高 20mg/周)作为 GC 维持治疗药物。在 GCA 发病后 6 个月时,TCZ 组的 5/31(16.1%)例患者和 MTX 组无患者达到 GC 持续缓解(p 值=0.001)。同样,在 12 个月时,TCZ 组和 MTX 组分别有 64.5%(20/31)和 11.1%(9/81)例患者达到 GC 持续缓解(p 值<0.001)。在 24 个月的随访中,TCZ 组有 7/31(22.6%)例患者和 MTX 组有 28/81(34.6%)例患者出现至少一次疾病复发,差异无统计学意义(p 值=0.22)。与 MTX 相比,TCZ 可使 GCA 患者更快地停止类固醇治疗,而不增加复发风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3def/11582127/137d784e969d/11739_2024_3722_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3def/11582127/66d5a04c4607/11739_2024_3722_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3def/11582127/137d784e969d/11739_2024_3722_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3def/11582127/66d5a04c4607/11739_2024_3722_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3def/11582127/137d784e969d/11739_2024_3722_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Faster steroid-free remission with tocilizumab compared to methotrexate in giant cell arteritis: a real-life experience in two reference centres.托珠单抗与甲氨蝶呤相比可更快实现巨细胞动脉炎的无类固醇缓解:两个参考中心的真实经验。
Intern Emerg Med. 2024 Nov;19(8):2177-2184. doi: 10.1007/s11739-024-03722-4. Epub 2024 Aug 2.
2
The Meteoritics Trial: efficacy of methotrexate after remission-induction with tocilizumab and glucocorticoids in giant cell arteritis-study protocol for a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group phase II study.《Meteoritics 试验:托西珠单抗和糖皮质激素诱导缓解后甲氨蝶呤治疗巨细胞动脉炎的疗效:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行分组 II 期研究方案》
Trials. 2024 Jan 15;25(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-07905-4.
3
Does glucocorticosteroid-resistant large-vessel vasculitis (giant cell arteritis and Takayasu arteritis) exist and how can remission be achieved? A critical review of the literature.是否存在糖皮质激素抵抗性大血管血管炎(巨细胞动脉炎和 Takayasu 动脉炎),如何实现缓解?文献综述。
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2012 Jan-Feb;30(1 Suppl 70):S114-29. Epub 2012 May 11.
4
Tocilizumab in Giant Cell Arteritis: A Real-Life Retrospective Study.托珠单抗治疗巨细胞动脉炎:一项真实世界回顾性研究。
Angiology. 2018 Oct;69(9):763-769. doi: 10.1177/0003319717753223. Epub 2018 Jan 17.
5
Taper versus discontinuation of tocilizumab in patients with giant cell arteritis: Real-world experience from a tertiary center.巨细胞动脉炎患者中托珠单抗的逐渐减量与停药:来自一家三级中心的真实世界经验。
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2024 Oct;68:152508. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2024.152508. Epub 2024 Jul 4.
6
[Treatment of giant cell arteritis: what is in the pipeline?].[巨细胞动脉炎的治疗:有哪些正在研发中的药物?]
Z Rheumatol. 2020 Aug;79(6):516-522. doi: 10.1007/s00393-020-00808-0.
7
Efficacy and tolerance of methotrexate in a real-life monocentric cohort of patients with giant cell arteritis.甲氨蝶呤在巨细胞动脉炎单中心真实世界队列患者中的疗效及耐受性
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2023 Jun;60:152192. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2023.152192. Epub 2023 Mar 20.
8
Tocilizumab in giant cell arteritis. Observational, open-label multicenter study of 134 patients in clinical practice.托珠单抗治疗巨细胞动脉炎。临床实践中 134 例患者的观察性、开放性、多中心研究。
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2019 Aug;49(1):126-135. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2019.01.003. Epub 2019 Jan 5.
9
The Role of Multimodality Imaging in Monitoring Disease Activity and Therapeutic Response to Tocilizumab in Giant Cell Arteritis.多模态影像学在监测巨细胞动脉炎患者对托珠单抗的疾病活动度和治疗反应中的作用。
Mediators Inflamm. 2020 Sep 27;2020:3203241. doi: 10.1155/2020/3203241. eCollection 2020.
10
Real-world Risk of Relapse of Giant Cell Arteritis Treated With Tocilizumab: A Retrospective Analysis of 43 Patients.托珠单抗治疗巨细胞动脉炎复发的真实世界风险:43 例患者的回顾性分析。
J Rheumatol. 2021 Sep;48(9):1435-1441. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.200952. Epub 2021 Feb 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Further clinical data on the more rapid achievement of remission without the use of steroids with tocilizumab compared to methotrexate in giant-cell arteritis.与甲氨蝶呤相比,托珠单抗在巨细胞动脉炎中无需使用类固醇就能更快实现缓解的更多临床数据。
Intern Emerg Med. 2025 Jan;20(1):9-10. doi: 10.1007/s11739-024-03769-3. Epub 2024 Nov 4.

本文引用的文献

1
The pre-clinical phase of giant cell arteritis: new clues in the pathogenesis of giant cell arteritis supporting emerging targets.巨细胞动脉炎的临床前阶段:巨细胞动脉炎发病机制中的新线索支持新出现的靶点。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2023 Jun 1;62(6):2032-2034. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keac697.
2
Treatment of Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA).巨细胞动脉炎(GCA)的治疗
J Clin Med. 2022 Mar 24;11(7):1799. doi: 10.3390/jcm11071799.
3
Advances in the Treatment of Giant Cell Arteritis.巨细胞动脉炎的治疗进展
J Clin Med. 2022 Mar 13;11(6):1588. doi: 10.3390/jcm11061588.
4
Presentation and Real-World Management of Giant Cell Arteritis (Artemis Study).巨细胞动脉炎的临床表现与真实世界管理(阿尔忒弥斯研究)。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Nov 11;8:732934. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.732934. eCollection 2021.
5
New-onset versus relapsing giant cell arteritis treated with tocilizumab: 3-year results from a randomized controlled trial and extension.新发病与复发巨细胞动脉炎应用托珠单抗治疗:一项随机对照试验和扩展研究的 3 年结果。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2022 Jul 6;61(7):2915-2922. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab780.
6
Steroid-Sparing Effect of Tocilizumab and Methotrexate in Patients with Polymyalgia Rheumatica: A Retrospective Cohort Study.托珠单抗和甲氨蝶呤对风湿性多肌痛患者的激素节省效应:一项回顾性队列研究
J Clin Med. 2021 Jun 30;10(13):2948. doi: 10.3390/jcm10132948.
7
Assessment of the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab in patients over 80 years old with giant cell arteritis.评估托珠单抗在 80 岁以上巨细胞动脉炎患者中的疗效和安全性。
Arthritis Res Ther. 2021 May 19;23(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s13075-021-02529-4.
8
Resolution of vascular inflammation in patients with new-onset giant cell arteritis: data from the RIGA study.新诊断的巨细胞动脉炎患者血管炎症的消退:来自 RIGA 研究的数据。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2021 Aug 2;60(8):3851-3861. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab332.
9
Tocilizumab in refractory giant cell arteritis. Monotherapy versus combined therapy with conventional immunosuppressive drugs. Observational multicenter study of 134 patients.托珠单抗治疗难治性巨细胞动脉炎。单药治疗与常规免疫抑制药物联合治疗的比较。134 例患者的观察性多中心研究。
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2021 Apr;51(2):387-394. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2021.01.006. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
10
Treatment strategy introducing immunosuppressive drugs with glucocorticoids ab initio or very early in giant cell arteritis: A multicenter retrospective controlled study.在巨细胞动脉炎起始时或极早期引入免疫抑制药物联合糖皮质激素的治疗策略:一项多中心回顾性对照研究
J Transl Autoimmun. 2020 Nov 28;3:100072. doi: 10.1016/j.jtauto.2020.100072. eCollection 2020.