Department of Health Science, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Department of Neurosciences, Psychology, Drug Research, and Child Health, University of Florence.
J Pers Disord. 2024 Aug;38(4):368-400. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2024.38.4.368.
In the Alternative Model of Personality Disorders (AMPD), psychopathy is marked by the presence of attention seeking, low anxiousness, and lack of social withdrawal, along with traits from the domains of Antagonism and Disinhibition. The triarchic model of psychopathy (TriPM) posits three biobehaviorally based traits underlying it: disinhibition, meanness, and boldness. The current study directly compared relations for measures of the two models with the broad dimensions of externalizing, internalizing, and positive adjustment. Participants (1,678 adults) were surveyed regarding maladaptive personality traits, clinical symptoms, and positive adjustment features. The TriPM model explained more variance than the AMPD in substance use, positive adjustment, and empathy, whereas the AMPD model explained more variance in internalizing symptoms. In addition, AMPD Antagonism and the Psychopathy Specifier diverged from TriPM Meanness and Boldness in their associations with some specific outcomes. Overall, our study provides evidence for complementarity of the two models in characterizing the multifaceted nature of psychopathy.
在替代人格障碍模型(AMPD)中,精神病态的特征是寻求关注、低焦虑和缺乏社交退缩,以及来自对抗和去抑制领域的特征。三因素精神病态模型(TriPM)假设它由三个基于生物行为的特征构成:去抑制、卑鄙和大胆。本研究直接比较了两个模型的测量与外倾、内倾和积极适应的广泛维度之间的关系。参与者(1678 名成年人)接受了关于适应不良人格特质、临床症状和积极适应特征的调查。TriPM 模型比 AMPD 模型在物质使用、积极适应和同理心方面解释了更多的方差,而 AMPD 模型在内部症状方面解释了更多的方差。此外,AMPD 对抗和精神病态特质在与某些特定结果的关联上与 TriPM 卑鄙和大胆不同。总的来说,我们的研究为这两个模型在描述精神病态的多方面性质方面的互补性提供了证据。