Department of Surgery and Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University West Hospital, Richmond, Virginia.
Department of Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University West Hospital.
J Pers Disord. 2024 Aug;38(4):350-367. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2024.38.4.350.
The escalating global concerns surrounding radicalization and violent extremism necessitate a comprehensive understanding and explanation. Identifying the risk factors associated with radicalism and violent extremism is critical to the development of risk assessment, prevention, and intervention strategies. It is imperative to distinguish these risks from civic responsibilities (i.e., activism) to safeguard individual rights. This study aims to examine the association between well-established risk factors for violence-personality disorder symptoms-and violent extremist attitudes, radicalism, and activism. Findings indicate that antisocial personality disorder symptoms were linked to violent extremist attitudes and radicalism, whereas obsessive-compulsive disorder symptoms were related to activism. This suggests that obsessive-compulsive personality disorder may signify a readiness for legal and nonviolent political action; in contrast, antisocial personality disorder symptoms signify a readiness for extremist violence and illegal political action.
全球对激进化和暴力极端主义的担忧日益加剧，因此需要全面理解和解释。确定与激进化和暴力极端主义相关的风险因素对于制定风险评估、预防和干预策略至关重要。必须将这些风险与公民责任（即激进主义）区分开来，以保护个人权利。本研究旨在探讨暴力人格障碍症状的既定风险因素与暴力极端主义态度、激进主义和激进主义之间的关联。研究结果表明，反社会人格障碍症状与暴力极端主义态度和激进主义有关，而强迫症症状与激进主义有关。这表明强迫症人格障碍可能预示着准备采取合法和非暴力的政治行动；相反，反社会人格障碍症状预示着准备采取极端暴力和非法政治行动。
