Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Aug 2;103(31):e38962. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038962.
Remimazolam is manifested by rapid action, hemodynamic stability, and fast recovery. Our study aimed to investigate whether the quality of recovery (QoR) after remimazolam anesthesia in patients undergoing transurethral resection of bladder tumor, which is predominantly performed in the elderly population, is not inferior to that after conventional anesthesia using sevoflurane.
Thirty-four patients were randomly allocated into either of group S (n = 17, receiving sevoflurane anesthesia), or group R (n = 17, receiving remimazolam anesthesia). The QoR was assessed by Korean version of QoR-15 questionnaire, on the day before and after the surgery. Scores acquired for each individual item, QoR-15 scores categorized into 5 dimensions (physical comfort, physical independence, psychological support, emotional state, and pain), and overall global score were subjected to comparative analysis. The primary outcome was postoperative global QoR-15, and a noninferiority delta value of 8.0 was employed.
The postoperative global QoR-15 in the group S was 141 (134-146), and in the groups R was 133 (128-142) (P = .152). The mean difference of global QoR-15 (group S-group R) was 1.471 (95% confidence interval of -10.204 to 13.146), and the lower 95% confidence interval margin was lower than the noninferiority margin of -8.0. When comparing the QoR-15 sorted by 5 dimensions, pain scored higher in the group S (20 [18-20]) compared to the group R (15 [15-20], P = .032).
The postoperative QoR following transurethral resection of bladder tumor was found to be lower in patients anesthetized with remimazolam in comparison to those anesthetized with sevoflurane.
瑞马唑仑起效迅速,血流动力学稳定,苏醒迅速。我们的研究旨在探讨在主要为老年患者施行的经尿道膀胱肿瘤电切术中,使用瑞马唑仑麻醉后的恢复质量(QoR)是否不劣于使用七氟醚的常规麻醉。
34 名患者被随机分配到 S 组(n=17,接受七氟醚麻醉)或 R 组(n=17,接受瑞马唑仑麻醉)。在手术前后,使用韩国版 QoR-15 问卷评估 QoR。对每个单项评分、QoR-15 评分分为 5 个维度(身体舒适度、身体独立性、心理支持、情绪状态和疼痛)以及总体总分进行对比分析。主要结局为术后总体 QoR-15,采用 8.0 的非劣效性差值。
S 组术后总体 QoR-15 为 141(134-146),R 组为 133(128-142)(P=0.152)。S 组和 R 组的总体 QoR-15 平均值差值为 1.471(95%置信区间为-10.204 至 13.146),下限 95%置信区间低于-8.0 的非劣效性边界。比较 5 个维度的 QoR-15 时,S 组的疼痛评分(20 [18-20])高于 R 组(15 [15-20])(P=0.032)。
与七氟醚麻醉相比,使用瑞马唑仑麻醉行经尿道膀胱肿瘤电切术后患者的术后 QoR 较低。