• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

瑞马唑仑-0.6%七氟醚麻醉在垂体瘤切除术中闪光视觉诱发电位监测中的应用:一项非劣效性随机对照试验。

Application of remimazolam-0.6% sevoflurane anesthesia for flash visual evoked potential monitoring during pituitary adenoma resection: a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Liaocheng People's Hospital, No. 67. Dongchang West Road, Liaocheng, Shandong, 252000, China.

Department of Neurosurgery, Liaocheng Brain Hospital affiliated Liaocheng People's Hospital, No. 45. Huashan Road, Liaocheng, Shandong, 252000, China.

出版信息

BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Feb 29;24(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02466-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12871-024-02466-0
PMID:38424486
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10903035/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Flash visual evoked potential (FVEP) is a critical method for monitoring intraoperative visual function during neurosurgery. A new benzodiazepine drug called remimazolam has recently been used for general anesthesia. However, the impact of remimazolam on FVEP remains unclear. Therefore, we aimed to investigate how remimazolam, in comparison to propofol, when combined with 0.6% sevoflurane anesthesia, affects the FVEP waveform during pituitary adenoma resection.

METHODS

Overall, 36 patients undergoing pituitary adenoma resection under general anesthesia were randomly assigned to either the remimazolam group (Group R) or the propofol group (Group P) in a prospective, randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial. For anesthesia induction, a bolus of 0.2 mg/kg remimazolam or 2 mg/kg propofol was intravenously infused for approximately one minute. The anesthesia was maintained by continuous infusion of either remimazolam (0.7-1.0 mg/kg/h) or propofol (4-6 mg/kg/h), in combination with 0.6% sevoflurane, aimed at sustaining the bispectral index (BIS) within the range of 40-60. The primary outcome was the N75-P100 amplitude of FVEP recorded at approximately 20 min after intubation (T0). 10% of the amplitude at T0 in group P was defined as the non-inferiority margin (δ). Confidence interval testing was used to evaluate the non-inferiority hypothesis. The secondary outcomes covered the P100 latency of FVEP, electroretinogram (ERG) b wave amplitude, demographic characteristics, hemodynamics, and occurrence of adverse events.

RESULTS

The BIS index during anesthesia was comparable between the groups at the same measured time points (P > 0.05). The N75-P100 amplitude at T0 in group R was 7.64 ± 1.36 µV, while it was 6.96 ± 0.95 µV in group P (P = 0.09), with a mean difference of 0.68 µV (95% CI, -0.11 µV to 1.48 µV). The δ was set at 0.7 and the lower limit of the 95% CI exceeded the -δ. Both remimazolam and propofol had little effect on ERG b-wave amplitudes. At the designated time points, FVEP amplitude and P100 latency displayed no appreciable variation between the two groups (P > 0.05). Furthermore, there were no significant differences in the incidence of adverse events related to anesthesia, needle electrodes, or surgery between the two groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that remimazolam-0.6% sevoflurane is non-inferior to propofol-0.6% sevoflurane for general anesthesia, based on the FVEP N75-P100 amplitude. The electrophysiological data obtained in both groups indicate that reproducible and stable FVEP and ERG waveforms can be acquired at set time points. Therefore, for reliable FVEP monitoring, remimazolam-0.6% sevoflurane appears to be a safe and effective protocol in general anesthesia.

TRIALS REGISTRATION

This study was registered on chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR2200056803, 17/02/2022).

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f48d/10903035/7a2724a54eac/12871_2024_2466_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f48d/10903035/041636ce83a5/12871_2024_2466_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f48d/10903035/71932703ff38/12871_2024_2466_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f48d/10903035/ecf34d1bdd56/12871_2024_2466_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f48d/10903035/7a2724a54eac/12871_2024_2466_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f48d/10903035/041636ce83a5/12871_2024_2466_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f48d/10903035/71932703ff38/12871_2024_2466_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f48d/10903035/ecf34d1bdd56/12871_2024_2466_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f48d/10903035/7a2724a54eac/12871_2024_2466_Fig4_HTML.jpg
摘要

背景

闪光视觉诱发电位(FVEP)是术中监测神经外科手术期间视觉功能的关键方法。一种名为瑞马唑仑的新型苯二氮䓬类药物最近已用于全身麻醉。然而,瑞马唑仑对 FVEP 的影响尚不清楚。因此,我们旨在研究瑞马唑仑与丙泊酚联合 0.6%七氟醚麻醉时,对垂体腺瘤切除术中 FVEP 波形的影响。

方法

本前瞻性、随机、对照、非劣效性试验共纳入 36 例行垂体腺瘤切除术的全身麻醉患者,随机分为瑞马唑仑组(R 组)和丙泊酚组(P 组)。麻醉诱导时,静脉输注 0.2mg/kg 瑞马唑仑或 2mg/kg 丙泊酚,持续约 1 分钟。麻醉维持采用瑞马唑仑(0.7-1.0mg/kg/h)或丙泊酚(4-6mg/kg/h)持续输注,联合 0.6%七氟醚,使脑电双频指数(BIS)维持在 40-60 之间。主要结局为插管后约 20min(T0)记录的 FVEP 的 N75-P100 振幅。P 组 T0 时振幅的 10%定义为非劣性边界(δ)。置信区间检验用于评估非劣效性假设。次要结局包括 FVEP 的 P100 潜伏期、视网膜电图(ERG)b 波振幅、人口统计学特征、血流动力学和不良事件的发生。

结果

两组在同一测量时间点的 BIS 指数无统计学差异(P>0.05)。R 组 T0 时 N75-P100 振幅为 7.64±1.36µV,P 组为 6.96±0.95µV(P=0.09),平均差异为 0.68µV(95%CI,-0.11µV 至 1.48µV)。δ设定为 0.7,95%CI 的下限超过-δ。瑞马唑仑和丙泊酚对 ERG b 波振幅均无明显影响。在指定时间点,两组 FVEP 振幅和 P100 潜伏期无明显变化(P>0.05)。此外,两组在与麻醉、针电极或手术相关的不良事件发生率方面无统计学差异(P>0.05)。

结论

根据 FVEP N75-P100 振幅,我们的研究结果表明,瑞马唑仑-0.6%七氟醚在全身麻醉方面不劣于丙泊酚-0.6%七氟醚。两组的电生理数据表明,在设定的时间点可以获得可重复和稳定的 FVEP 和 ERG 波形。因此,对于可靠的 FVEP 监测,瑞马唑仑-0.6%七氟醚似乎是全身麻醉中一种安全有效的方案。

试验注册

本研究在中国临床试验注册中心注册(ChiCTR2200056803,2022 年 2 月 17 日)。

相似文献

1
Application of remimazolam-0.6% sevoflurane anesthesia for flash visual evoked potential monitoring during pituitary adenoma resection: a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial.瑞马唑仑-0.6%七氟醚麻醉在垂体瘤切除术中闪光视觉诱发电位监测中的应用:一项非劣效性随机对照试验。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Feb 29;24(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02466-0.
2
Effects of Sevoflurane-Propofol-Balanced Anesthesia on Flash Visual Evoked Potential Monitoring in Spine Surgery: A Randomized Noninferiority Trial.七氟醚-丙泊酚平衡麻醉对脊柱手术闪光视觉诱发电位监测的影响:一项随机非劣效性试验。
Anesth Analg. 2022 May 1;134(5):1054-1061. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005742.
3
Effect of desflurane anesthesia on flash visual evoked potential monitoring in patients undergoing spine surgery: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.七氟醚麻醉对脊柱手术患者闪光视觉诱发电位监测的影响:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2024 Jun 6;25(1):362. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08211-9.
4
Differential effects of sevoflurane and propofol on an electroretinogram and visual evoked potentials.七氟醚和丙泊酚对视网膜电图及视觉诱发电位的不同影响。
J Anesth. 2020 Apr;34(2):298-302. doi: 10.1007/s00540-020-02733-7. Epub 2020 Jan 16.
5
The intraoperative motor-evoked potential when propofol was changed to remimazolam during general anesthesia: a case series.全麻期间异丙酚换用瑞马唑仑时的术中运动诱发电位:病例系列研究。
J Anesth. 2023 Feb;37(1):154-159. doi: 10.1007/s00540-022-03112-0. Epub 2022 Nov 1.
6
Comparison of remimazolam tosilate and propofol during induction and maintenance of general anesthesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective, single center, randomized controlled trial.瑞马唑仑甲苯磺酸盐与丙泊酚在腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者全麻诱导和维持中的比较:一项前瞻性、单中心、随机对照试验。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Jul 6;24(1):226. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02614-6.
7
Effect of remimazolam vs propofol on emergence from general anesthesia in patients undergoing cerebral endovascular procedures: A randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial.瑞马唑仑对比丙泊酚对行脑血管介入诊疗术患者全麻苏醒的影响:一项随机对照、非劣效性试验。
J Clin Anesth. 2024 May;93:111356. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2023.111356. Epub 2023 Dec 5.
8
Hemodynamic Influences of Remimazolam Versus Propofol During the Induction Period of General Anesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.全麻诱导期雷米唑仑与丙泊酚对血流动力学影响的系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Pain Physician. 2023 Nov;26(7):E761-E773.
9
Comparison of remimazolam-based and propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia on postoperative quality of recovery: A randomized non-inferiority trial.瑞马唑仑与依托咪酯全身静脉麻醉对术后恢复质量的影响比较:一项随机非劣效性试验。
J Clin Anesth. 2022 Nov;82:110955. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2022.110955. Epub 2022 Aug 25.
10
Efficacy of remimazolam tosilate versus propofol for total intravenous anaesthesia in urological surgery: A randomised clinical trial.甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑与丙泊酚用于泌尿外科手术全静脉麻醉的疗效比较:一项随机临床试验。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2024 Mar 1;41(3):208-216. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001938. Epub 2024 Jan 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Remimazolam induced cytotoxicity mediated through multiple stress pathways and acted synergistically with tyrosine kinase inhibitors in hepatocellular carcinoma.瑞马唑仑通过多种应激途径诱导细胞毒性,并在肝细胞癌中与酪氨酸激酶抑制剂协同作用。
Redox Rep. 2025 Dec;30(1):2475696. doi: 10.1080/13510002.2025.2475696. Epub 2025 Mar 7.
2
Effect of combination of remimazolam and sevoflurane on elderly patients' recovery quality from general anesthesia after laparoscopic abdominal surgery: a randomized controlled trial.瑞米唑仑与七氟醚联合应用对老年患者腹腔镜腹部手术后全身麻醉恢复质量的影响:一项随机对照试验
Perioper Med (Lond). 2025 Feb 13;14(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s13741-025-00501-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of the recovery profile of remimazolam with flumazenil and propofol anesthesia for open thyroidectomy.比较雷米佐仑与氟马西尼和丙泊酚麻醉用于甲状腺开放手术的恢复特征。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2023 May 2;23(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s12871-023-02104-1.
2
Evolution of flash visual evoked potentials to monitor visual pathway integrity during tumor resection: illustrative cases and literature review.利用闪光视觉诱发电位监测肿瘤切除术中视觉通路完整性的研究进展:病例展示与文献综述
Neurosurg Rev. 2023 Jan 30;46(1):46. doi: 10.1007/s10143-023-01955-z.
3
Motor-evoked potentials monitoring with remimazolam during thoracic descending aortic aneurysm surgery: a case report.
胸降主动脉瘤手术中瑞马唑仑用于运动诱发电位监测:一例报告
J Anesth. 2023 Apr;37(2):315-318. doi: 10.1007/s00540-023-03168-6. Epub 2023 Jan 25.
4
Effect of remimazolam on intraoperative neurophysiology monitoring of visual-evoked potential: a case series.瑞米唑仑对视觉诱发电位术中神经生理监测的影响:病例系列
J Anesth. 2023 Apr;37(2):311-314. doi: 10.1007/s00540-022-03159-z. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
5
Remimazolam Tosylate Combined with Low-Dose Propofol Improves Sedation and Safety in Hysteroscopy.甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑联合小剂量丙泊酚在宫腔镜检查中改善镇静效果和安全性。
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2022 Nov 29;16:4101-4108. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S390403. eCollection 2022.
6
Comparison of remimazolam-based and propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia on postoperative quality of recovery: A randomized non-inferiority trial.瑞马唑仑与依托咪酯全身静脉麻醉对术后恢复质量的影响比较:一项随机非劣效性试验。
J Clin Anesth. 2022 Nov;82:110955. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2022.110955. Epub 2022 Aug 25.
7
Factors affecting prolonged time to extubation in patients given remimazolam.影响 REM 咪唑安定给药患者拔管时间延长的因素。
PLoS One. 2022 May 18;17(5):e0268568. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268568. eCollection 2022.
8
Quality of Recovery After General Anesthesia with Remimazolam in Patients' Undergoing Urologic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Remimazolam with Propofol.瑞马唑仑与丙泊酚用于全身麻醉下泌尿外科手术患者术后恢复质量的随机对照研究
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2022 Apr 27;16:1199-1209. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S359496. eCollection 2022.
9
Efficacy and Safety of Remimazolam Tosilate versus Propofol for General Anesthesia in Cirrhotic Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Variceal Ligation.甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑与丙泊酚用于肝硬化患者内镜下静脉曲张结扎术全身麻醉的疗效与安全性比较
Int J Gen Med. 2022 Jan 13;15:583-591. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S345390. eCollection 2022.
10
Non-invasive visual evoked potentials under sevoflurane ketamine-xylazine in rats.大鼠在七氟醚、氯胺酮-赛拉嗪麻醉下的无创视觉诱发电位
Heliyon. 2021 Nov 9;7(11):e08360. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08360. eCollection 2021 Nov.