• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Coping Mechanisms and Their Associations With Depression and Anxiety Among Healthcare Workers in the Aftermath of COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情后医护人员的应对机制及其与抑郁和焦虑的关系。
J Occup Environ Med. 2024 Oct 1;66(10):857-862. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000003196. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
2
The prevalence of and factors associated with depressive and anxiety symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic among healthcare workers in South Africa.南非医护人员在 COVID-19 大流行期间抑郁和焦虑症状的流行情况及相关因素。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 7;19(3):e0299584. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299584. eCollection 2024.
3
Surviving SARS and living through COVID-19: Healthcare worker mental health outcomes and insights for coping.从 SARS 幸存和 COVID-19 中挺过来:医护人员心理健康结果及应对见解。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 10;16(11):e0258893. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258893. eCollection 2021.
4
Mental Health Burden and Facilitators Among Frontline Healthcare Professionals in Nigeria Amid COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-sectional Study.尼日利亚 COVID-19 大流行期间一线医护人员的心理健康负担和促进因素:一项横断面研究。
Niger J Clin Pract. 2024 Apr 1;27(4):475-482. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_704_23. Epub 2024 Apr 29.
5
Psychological Effects of COVID-19 Among Health Care Workers, and How They Are Coping: A Web-Based, Cross-Sectional Study During the First Wave of COVID-19 in Pakistan.新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情期间医护人员的心理影响及其应对方式:巴基斯坦第一波疫情期间的一项基于网络的横断面研究。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2022 Jan 10;17:e104. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2022.4.
6
The mental health toll among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Malawi. Malawi 新冠肺炎大流行期间医护人员的心理健康问题。
Sci Rep. 2024 May 6;14(1):10327. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-61216-x.
7
Coping Strategies Among Healthcare Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Emotional Responses, Challenges, and Adaptive Practices.新冠疫情期间医护人员的应对策略:情绪反应、挑战及适应性做法
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Feb 11;61(2):311. doi: 10.3390/medicina61020311.
8
Factors associated with resilience among non-local medical workers sent to Wuhan, China during the COVID-19 outbreak.与 COVID-19 疫情期间派往中国武汉的非本地医务人员韧性相关的因素。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Aug 24;20(1):417. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02821-8.
9
Predictors of mental health in healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: The role of experiential avoidance, emotion regulation and resilience.COVID-19 大流行期间医护人员心理健康的预测因素:经验性回避、情绪调节和韧性的作用。
J Adv Nurs. 2024 Oct;80(10):4089-4102. doi: 10.1111/jan.16122. Epub 2024 Feb 21.
10
A multinational, multicentre study on the psychological outcomes and associated physical symptoms amongst healthcare workers during COVID-19 outbreak.一项针对 COVID-19 爆发期间医护人员心理结果和相关身体症状的多国多中心研究。
Brain Behav Immun. 2020 Aug;88:559-565. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2020.04.049. Epub 2020 Apr 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing Occupational Work-Related Stress and Anxiety of Healthcare Staff During COVID-19 Using Fuzzy Natural Language-Based Association Rule Mining.利用基于模糊自然语言的关联规则挖掘评估新冠疫情期间医护人员与工作相关的职业压力和焦虑
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jul 18;13(14):1745. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13141745.

本文引用的文献

1
Anxiety and Depression during the Second Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Role of Coping Strategies.新冠疫情第二波期间的焦虑和抑郁:应对策略的作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 8;20(4):2974. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20042974.
2
Coping strategies and anxiety in young breast cancer survivors.年轻乳腺癌幸存者的应对策略和焦虑。
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Nov;30(11):9109-9116. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07325-7. Epub 2022 Aug 20.
3
Engaging Physicians in Leadership: Motivations, Challenges, and Identity-Based Considerations.参与领导力的医生:动机、挑战和基于身份的考虑。
J Healthc Manag. 2022 Jul 1;67(4):254-265. doi: 10.1097/JHM-D-21-00224.
4
Social support coping styles and psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic: The moderating role of sex.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,社会支持应对方式和心理困扰:性别的调节作用。
J Affect Disord. 2022 Jul 1;308:106-110. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.04.036. Epub 2022 Apr 13.
5
Sources of Distress and Coping Strategies Among Emergency Physicians During COVID-19.新冠疫情期间急诊医师的压力源与应对策略
West J Emerg Med. 2021 Oct 27;22(6):1240-1252. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2021.9.53406.
6
Alcohol and other substance use during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review.COVID-19 大流行期间的酒精和其他物质使用:系统评价。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021 Dec 1;229(Pt A):109150. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.109150. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
7
COVID-19 Pandemic Support Programs for Healthcare Workers and Implications for Occupational Mental Health: A Narrative Review.COVID-19 大流行期间针对医护人员的支持计划及其对职业心理健康的影响:一项叙述性综述。
Psychiatr Q. 2022 Mar;93(1):227-247. doi: 10.1007/s11126-021-09952-5. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
8
Evaluation of the mental health of health professionals in the COVID-19 era. What mental health conditions are our health care workers facing in the new wave of coronavirus?评估 COVID-19 时代卫生专业人员的心理健康。在新一轮冠状病毒中,我们的医护人员面临哪些心理健康问题?
Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Oct;75(10):e14607. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.14607. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
9
Beyond the physical risk: Psychosocial impact and coping in healthcare professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic.超越身体风险:新冠疫情期间医护人员的心理社会影响及应对措施
J Clin Nurs. 2021 Jul 6. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15938.
10
Psychometric properties of brief-COPE inventory among nurses.护士群体中简易应对方式问卷的心理测量学特性
BMC Nurs. 2021 May 6;20(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12912-021-00592-5.

新冠疫情后医护人员的应对机制及其与抑郁和焦虑的关系。

Coping Mechanisms and Their Associations With Depression and Anxiety Among Healthcare Workers in the Aftermath of COVID-19 Pandemic.

机构信息

From the Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York (N.M.); Center for Scientific Diversity, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York (N.M.); Institute for Translational Epidemiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York (N.M.); Department of Medical Education, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York (C.H.,L.A.P., J.H.R.); Office of Well-being and Resilience, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, New York (N.R.,C.F.,C.C.,L.A.P., J.H.P.); The City University of New York Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York, New York (N.R.); Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York (C.C., J.M.D.); James J. Peters Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, New York, New York (C.C.); Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York (U.C.); and Center for Scientific Diversity, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York (U.C.).

出版信息

J Occup Environ Med. 2024 Oct 1;66(10):857-862. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000003196. Epub 2024 Jul 31.

DOI:10.1097/JOM.0000000000003196
PMID:39095048
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11539021/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated the associations between anxiety, depression, and coping in healthcare workers during coronavirus disease 2019.

METHODS

A survey used the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 2 to assess anxiety, the Patient Health Questionnaire 2 to assess depression, and the Brief Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced (COPE) scale to evaluate coping mechanisms.

RESULTS

Of the 1172 participants who provided data, 24.7% screened positive for anxiety and 15.7% for depression. Logistic regression indicated that avoidance coping (odds ratio [OR], 3.92 [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.91-5.29]; P < 0.001) and substance use coping (OR, 1.39 [95% CI, 1.00-1.90]; P = 0.049) were associated with higher odds of depression. Avoidance coping (OR, 2.81 [95% CI, 2.15-3.67]; P < 0.001) and social support coping (OR, 1.59 [95% CI, 1.22-2.08]; P = 0.001) were associated with higher odds of anxiety.

CONCLUSIONS

Interventions are needed to improve healthcare workers' coping and well-being.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨 2019 年冠状病毒病期间医护人员焦虑、抑郁和应对方式之间的关系。

方法

采用广泛性焦虑障碍量表 2 版评估焦虑,采用患者健康问卷 2 版评估抑郁,采用简明应对方式问卷评估应对机制。

结果

在提供数据的 1172 名参与者中,24.7%的人焦虑筛查呈阳性,15.7%的人抑郁筛查呈阳性。Logistic 回归分析表明,回避应对(比值比 [OR],3.92 [95%置信区间 [CI],2.91-5.29];P < 0.001)和物质使用应对(OR,1.39 [95%CI,1.00-1.90];P = 0.049)与抑郁的可能性增加相关。回避应对(OR,2.81 [95%CI,2.15-3.67];P < 0.001)和社会支持应对(OR,1.59 [95%CI,1.22-2.08];P = 0.001)与焦虑的可能性增加相关。

结论

需要采取干预措施来改善医护人员的应对方式和幸福感。