Abdul Rahman Hanif, Bani Issa Wegdan, Naing Lin
PAPRSB Institute of Health Sciences, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Tungku Link Road, Gadong, BE1410, Brunei.
Research Institute for Medical and Health Sciences, Health Promotion Research Group, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.
BMC Nurs. 2021 May 6;20(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12912-021-00592-5.
Brief-COPE inventory is widely used to assess coping; however, validation evidence is absent and previous results were inconsistent. This study aimed to validate psychometric properties of this inventory to ensure culturally appropriate usage.
Preliminary validation study on 423 female nurses from the United Arab Emirates. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) with maximum likelihood estimation was computed to test four different previous models. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) protocol was used to determine underlying domain structure of Brief-COPE in this population.
The four previous models on CFA had inadequate fit indexes. Two-factor (22-items) second-order model that explained 37.0% of the total variance with Cronbach's alpha at 0.81 and 0.88, respectively, was suggested.
This validation of Brief-COPE is timely considering nurses enduring different types of stressors. In addition, cultural diversity needs to be considered in coping research. Re-assessment of this exploratory structure is necessary to ensure accurate measurement of coping strategies.
简易应对方式问卷(Brief-COPE inventory)被广泛用于评估应对方式;然而,其效度证据缺失,且先前的研究结果并不一致。本研究旨在验证该问卷的心理测量特性,以确保其在文化上的恰当使用。
对来自阿拉伯联合酋长国的423名女护士进行初步效度研究。采用最大似然估计的验证性因素分析(CFA)来检验先前的四种不同模型。探索性因素分析(EFA)方案用于确定该人群中简易应对方式问卷的潜在领域结构。
CFA的四种先前模型的拟合指数均不理想。建议采用二因素(22项)二阶模型,该模型解释了总方差的37.0%,Cronbach's α系数分别为0.81和0.88。
考虑到护士承受着不同类型的压力源,对简易应对方式问卷的这种效度验证很及时。此外,应对研究中需要考虑文化多样性。有必要重新评估这种探索性结构,以确保准确测量应对策略。