Suppr超能文献

外周血管内碎石术促进经股动脉导管主动脉瓣置换术——确定最佳可治疗外周动脉疾病负担

Peripheral intravascular lithotripsy to facilitate transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement - Defining optimal treatable peripheral arterial disease burden.

作者信息

Tom Stephanie, Tully Andy, Kikuchi Yuta, Crawford Kaylyn, Binongo José, Wei Jane Wenjing, Gleason Patrick, Xie Joe, Devireddy Chandan M, Grubb Kendra J

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.

University of Maryland Department of Surgery, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2025 Apr;73:31-37. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2024.07.005. Epub 2024 Jul 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TF-TAVR) has proven superior to alternative access. However, some patients evaluated for TF-TAVR are unfit secondary to peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Peripheral intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) can facilitate femoral access. This study aimed to characterize optimal lesions that can be treated with IVL.

METHODS

Single-center, retrospective analysis of an institutional database, queried from 1/2018 through 7/2023 for all patients who underwent TAVR. Patients who received IVL-facilitated transfemoral access were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of 2862 TAVR cases identified, 92 (3.2 %) underwent lithotripsy. The IVL-facilitated cohort had a mean age of 78 ± 9.2 years and 45 % were female. The right common iliac artery was most treated (47). Most IVL was performed with 7-mm balloons (73.9 %). All cases were successful. 30-day mortality was 1.1 % (1/92).

CONCLUSIONS

In our cohort, complications after IVL-facilitated TF-TAVR were more common with small vessel diameter (≤4.7 mm), significant luminal loss (>50 % stenosis), and heavy calcium burden (arc calcification >180°). The findings support the use of IVL to expand the population of patients who can undergo TF-TAVR without the increased risks associated with the various forms of alternative access.

SUMMARY FOR ANNOTATED TABLE OF CONTENTS

IVL-facilitated TF-TAVR is safe and feasible. Despite its introduction to TAVR clinical practice in 2018, IVL-facilitated TF-TAVR is not regularly performed and could increase the population of patients eligible for TF-TAVR.

摘要

背景

经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TF-TAVR)已被证明优于其他入路方式。然而,一些接受TF-TAVR评估的患者因外周动脉疾病(PAD)而不适合。外周血管内碎石术(IVL)可促进股动脉入路。本研究旨在确定可通过IVL治疗的最佳病变特征。

方法

对机构数据库进行单中心回顾性分析,查询2018年1月至2023年7月期间所有接受TAVR的患者。对接受IVL辅助经股动脉入路的患者进行分析。

结果

在2862例已识别的TAVR病例中,92例(3.2%)接受了碎石术。IVL辅助队列的平均年龄为78±9.2岁,45%为女性。右侧髂总动脉是接受治疗最多的部位(47例)。大多数IVL使用7毫米球囊进行(73.9%)。所有病例均成功。30天死亡率为1.1%(1/92)。

结论

在我们的队列中,IVL辅助TF-TAVR术后并发症在血管直径较小(≤4.7毫米)、管腔显著狭窄(>50%狭窄)和钙化负荷较重(弧形钙化>180°)的情况下更为常见。这些发现支持使用IVL来扩大能够接受TF-TAVR的患者群体,而不会增加与各种替代入路相关的额外风险。

目录注释摘要

IVL辅助TF-TAVR安全可行。尽管IVL在2018年被引入TAVR临床实践,但IVL辅助TF-TAVR并未常规开展,且可增加适合TF-TAVR的患者群体。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验