Minimally Invasive Therapy Center, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
BMC Cancer. 2024 Aug 2;24(1):941. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12695-8.
Advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma lacks effective treatment options, and systemic gemcitabine-based chemotherapy offers only marginal survival benefits at the cost of significant toxicities and adverse events. New therapeutic options with better drug availability are warranted. This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of digital subtraction angiography (DSA)-guided pancreatic arterial infusion (PAI) versus intravenous chemotherapy (IVC) using the gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GEMOX) regimen in unresectable locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer (PC) patients.
This study prospectively enrolled 51 eligible treatment-naive patients with unresectable PC to receive GEMOX treatment via PAI or IVC (1:1 ratio randomization) from December 2015 to December 2019. Cycles were repeated monthly, and each process consisted of two treatments administered bi-weekly. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), 1-year survival, 6-month survival, tumor-site subgroup survival, and incidences of adverse events were compared.
The median OS of the PAI and IVC groups were 9.93 months and 10.07 months, respectively (p = 0.3049). The median PFS of the PAI and IVC groups were 5.07 months and 4.23 months (p = 0.1088). No significant differences were found in the ORR (11.54% vs. 4%, p = 0.6312), DCR (53.85% vs. 44%, p = 0.482), and 1-year OS rate (44% vs. 20.92%, p = 0.27) in PAI and IVC groups. The 6-month OS rate was significantly higher in the PAI group (100%) than in the IVC group (83.67%) (p = 0.0173). The median OS of patients in PAI group with pancreatic head and neck tumors were significantly higher than those of body and tail tumors (12.867 months vs. 9 months, p = 0.0214). The incidences of hematologic disorders, liver function disorders, and digestive disorders in the IVC group were higher than in the PAI group (p < 0.05).
GEMOX PAI therapy presented a higher 6-month OS rate and fewer adverse events than IVC in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients. Those with pancreatic head and neck tumors may yield a superior treatment outcome from PAI treatment.
NCT02635971.
21/12/2015.
晚期胰腺腺癌缺乏有效治疗方法,基于吉西他滨的全身化疗仅能提供微小的生存获益,且毒性和不良反应显著。需要新的、药物可及性更好的治疗选择。本研究旨在评估数字减影血管造影(DSA)引导的胰腺动脉内灌注(PAI)与静脉内化疗(IVC)联合吉西他滨和奥沙利铂(GEMOX)方案治疗不可切除的局部晚期或转移性胰腺腺癌(PC)患者的安全性和有效性。
本研究前瞻性纳入了 51 例未经治疗的不可切除 PC 患者,于 2015 年 12 月至 2019 年 12 月期间接受 GEMOX 治疗,通过 PAI 或 IVC(1:1 比例随机分组)。每 3 周重复治疗,每个周期包含 2 次双周治疗。比较总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)、客观缓解率(ORR)、疾病控制率(DCR)、1 年生存率、6 个月生存率、肿瘤部位亚组生存和不良反应发生率。
PAI 组和 IVC 组的中位 OS 分别为 9.93 个月和 10.07 个月(p=0.3049)。PAI 组和 IVC 组的中位 PFS 分别为 5.07 个月和 4.23 个月(p=0.1088)。PAI 组和 IVC 组的 ORR(11.54% vs. 4%,p=0.6312)、DCR(53.85% vs. 44%,p=0.482)和 1 年 OS 率(44% vs. 20.92%,p=0.27)均无显著差异。PAI 组的 6 个月 OS 率(100%)明显高于 IVC 组(83.67%)(p=0.0173)。PAI 组胰腺头颈部肿瘤患者的中位 OS 明显长于体尾部肿瘤患者(12.867 个月 vs. 9 个月,p=0.0214)。IVC 组血液系统疾病、肝功能障碍和消化系统疾病的发生率高于 PAI 组(p<0.05)。
与 IVC 相比,GEMOX PAI 治疗在晚期胰腺腺癌患者中具有更高的 6 个月 OS 率和更少的不良反应。胰腺头颈部肿瘤患者可能从 PAI 治疗中获得更好的治疗效果。
NCT02635971。
2015 年 12 月 21 日。