Clinic of Stomatology, Institution Shared with St. Anne´s University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Pekařská 53, Brno, 656 91, Czech Republic.
Faculty of Science, Palacky University Olomouc, 17. listopadu 1192/12, Olomouc, 779 00, Czech Republic.
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Aug 2;24(1):877. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04662-3.
This 20-year retrospective study aimed to evaluate the treatment methods used in patients with impacted maxillary permanent canines and to determine the occurrence of ankylotic and resorptive processes and their association with potential risk factors.
The cohort consisted of 351 consecutive Caucasian patients (120 males and 231 females, mean age 18.4 and 19.9 years, respectively) with 420 impacted maxillary permanent canines. CT and CBCT findings were subsequently confirmed during surgery. Statistical analyses were performed by the generalized linear models, Pearson x and Fisher exact tests using the statistical programs R and Statistica v. 14.
A total of 273 (65.0%) impacted canines were aligned in the dental arch by orthodontic traction after surgical exposure, this treatment was predominant in patients under 20 years of age. Surgical extraction was performed in 115 (27.2%) impacted canines and was more common in older patients. Ankylotic changes were recorded in 61 (14.5%) impacted canines. The probability of ankylosis increased with age, particularly after the patient's 20th year of life (p < 0.001). Patients were 1.2% likely to develop ankylosis at age 15 years, 4.3% at age 20 years, 14.1% at age 25 years, and 96.8% at age 45 years. Invasive cervical root resorption (ICRR) was found in 8 (1.9%) canines. In 4 canines (1.0%), root ankylosis in addition to ICRR was observed. In contrast to ankylosis, whose frequency of occurrence increased with age, the occurrence of ICRR resulting from PDL damage during surgery was more typical in younger patients. Canines in a high position above the root apices of the adjacent teeth, with a horizontal inclination of the longitudinal axis, with the crown located deep in the center of the alveolar bone and with labiopalatal position, should be considered critically impacted canines with a high risk to failure of orthodontic traction.
In conclusion, the treatment of impacted canines depends mainly on the age of the patient, and the position and inclination of the longitudinal axis of the impacted tooth. To select an adequate treatment method, we recommend CBCT examination, which allows a precise analysis of the position of impacted canines.
本回顾性研究旨在评估上颌埋伏恒尖牙的治疗方法,并确定发生粘连和吸收过程的情况及其与潜在危险因素的关系。
本队列包括 351 例连续的高加索患者(120 名男性和 231 名女性,平均年龄分别为 18.4 岁和 19.9 岁),共 420 颗埋伏上颌恒尖牙。随后在手术中通过 CT 和 CBCT 检查确认。使用 R 和 Statistica v.14 统计程序进行广义线性模型、Pearson x 和 Fisher 精确检验的统计分析。
273 颗(65.0%)埋伏尖牙通过手术暴露后的正畸牵引在牙弓中排列整齐,这种治疗方法主要适用于 20 岁以下的患者。115 颗(27.2%)埋伏尖牙行外科拔牙,这种情况在年龄较大的患者中更为常见。61 颗(14.5%)埋伏尖牙发生粘连性改变。随着年龄的增长,发生粘连的概率增加,尤其是在患者 20 岁以后(p<0.001)。15 岁时,患者发生粘连的概率为 1.2%,20 岁时为 4.3%,25 岁时为 14.1%,45 岁时为 96.8%。8 颗(1.9%)尖牙发生牙颈部根吸收(ICRR)。4 颗(1.0%)尖牙除了粘连外还发生 ICRR。与粘连随年龄增长而增加的发生率相反,手术中 PDL 损伤引起的 ICRR 更常见于年轻患者。位于邻牙根尖上方高位、长轴水平倾斜、牙冠位于牙槽骨中央深处、唇腭向位置的尖牙,应被视为具有较高正畸牵引失败风险的临界埋伏尖牙。
综上所述,埋伏尖牙的治疗主要取决于患者的年龄以及埋伏牙长轴的位置和倾斜度。为了选择合适的治疗方法,我们建议进行 CBCT 检查,这可以对埋伏尖牙的位置进行精确分析。