• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Understanding the impact of distance and disadvantage on lung cancer care and outcomes: a study protocol.了解距离和劣势对肺癌护理和结果的影响:一项研究方案。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Aug 2;24(1):942. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12705-9.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Understanding what affects psychological morbidity in informal carers when providing care at home for patients at the end of life: a systematic qualitative evidence synthesis.了解在家中为临终患者提供护理时,哪些因素会影响非正式护理人员的心理发病率:一项系统的定性证据综合分析。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Sep;13(8):1-53. doi: 10.3310/PYTR4127.
4
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
5
Using Palliative Care Needs Rounds in the UK for care home staff and residents: an implementation science study.在英国,使用姑息治疗需求评估小组为养老院工作人员和居民提供服务:一项实施科学研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Jul;12(19):1-134. doi: 10.3310/KRWQ5829.
6
7
Experiences of Health Care Access Challenges for Back Pain Care Across the Rural-Urban Continuum in Canada: Protocol for Cross-sectional Research.加拿大城乡连续体中背痛护理的医疗保健获取挑战经历:横断面研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Dec 19;11(12):e42484. doi: 10.2196/42484.
8
Enhancing Cancer care of rural dwellers through telehealth and engagement (ENCORE): protocol to evaluate effectiveness of a multi-level telehealth-based intervention to improve rural cancer care delivery.通过远程医疗和参与改善农村居民癌症护理(ENCORE):评估基于远程医疗的多层次干预措施改善农村癌症护理服务效果的方案
BMC Cancer. 2021 Nov 23;21(1):1262. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08949-4.
9
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
10

本文引用的文献

1
A systematic review on the qualitative experiences of people living with lung cancer in rural areas.农村地区肺癌患者生活体验的定性研究系统综述。
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Feb 6;32(3):144. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08342-4.
2
Implementing the European code of cancer practice in rural settings.在农村环境中实施欧洲癌症实践准则。
J Cancer Policy. 2024 Mar;39:100465. doi: 10.1016/j.jcpo.2023.100465. Epub 2024 Jan 4.
3
Advances and challenges in the treatment of lung cancer.肺癌治疗的进展与挑战。
Biomed Pharmacother. 2023 Dec 31;169:115891. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2023.115891. Epub 2023 Nov 16.
4
Developing a 'Living with Cancer' programme in a rural and coastal setting: Experiences of collaborative and innovative co-production across an Integrated Health System.在农村和沿海地区开发“与癌症共存”项目:跨综合卫生系统进行协作和创新共同制定的经验。
J Cancer Policy. 2023 Dec;38:100452. doi: 10.1016/j.jcpo.2023.100452. Epub 2023 Nov 4.
5
Clinical trials in cancer screening, prevention and early diagnosis (SPED): a systematic mapping review.癌症筛查、预防和早期诊断(SPED)临床试验:系统制图综述。
BMC Cancer. 2023 Sep 4;23(1):820. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-11300-8.
6
Valuing place in doctors' decisions to work in remote and rural locations.重视地点因素在医生决定前往偏远和农村地区工作中的作用。
Future Healthc J. 2022 Nov;9(3):248-251. doi: 10.7861/fhj.2022-0089.
7
Emerging Strategies for the Treatment of Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Review.小细胞肺癌治疗的新兴策略:综述
JAMA Oncol. 2023 Mar 1;9(3):419-429. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.5631.
8
An International Consensus on Actions to Improve Lung Cancer Survival: A Modified Delphi Method Among Clinical Experts in the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership.国际改善肺癌生存行动计划共识:国际癌症基准合作组织临床专家的改良德尔菲法。
Cancer Control. 2022 Jan-Dec;29:10732748221119354. doi: 10.1177/10732748221119354.
9
The National Lung Cancer Audit: The Impact of COVID-19.国家肺癌审计:COVID-19 的影响。
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2022 Nov;34(11):701-707. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2022.09.002. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
10
Socio-economic deprivation and cancer incidence in England: Quantifying the role of smoking.社会经济剥夺与英格兰的癌症发病情况:定量分析吸烟的作用。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 21;17(9):e0272202. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272202. eCollection 2022.

了解距离和劣势对肺癌护理和结果的影响:一项研究方案。

Understanding the impact of distance and disadvantage on lung cancer care and outcomes: a study protocol.

机构信息

Centre for Cancer Screening, Prevention, and Early Diagnosis, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK.

Lincoln Institute for Rural and Coastal Health, College of Health and Science, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK.

出版信息

BMC Cancer. 2024 Aug 2;24(1):942. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12705-9.

DOI:10.1186/s12885-024-12705-9
PMID:39095781
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11295610/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer is the third most common cancer in the UK and the leading cause of cancer mortality globally. NHS England guidance for optimum lung cancer care recommends management and treatment by a specialist team, with experts concentrated in one place, providing access to specialised diagnostic and treatment facilities. However, the complex and rapidly evolving diagnostic and treatment pathways for lung cancer, together with workforce limitations, make achieving this challenging. This place-based, behavioural science-informed qualitative study aims to explore how person-related characteristics interact with a person's location relative to specialist services to impact their engagement with the optimal lung pathway, and to compare and contrast experiences in rural, coastal, and urban communities. This study also aims to generate translatable evidence to inform the evidence-based design of a patient engagement intervention to improve lung cancer patients' and informal carers' participation in and experience of the lung cancer care pathway.

METHODS

A qualitative cross-sectional interview study with people diagnosed with lung cancer < 6 months before recruitment (in receipt of surgery, radical radiotherapy, or living with advanced disease) and their informal carers. Participants will be recruited purposively from Barts Health NHS Trust and United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trusts to ensure a diverse sample across urban and rural settings. Semi-structured interviews will explore factors affecting individuals' capability, opportunity, and motivation to engage with their recommended diagnostic and treatment pathway. A framework approach, informed by the COM-B model, will be used to thematically analyse facilitators and barriers to patient engagement.

DISCUSSION

The study aligns with the current policy priority to ensure that people with cancer, no matter where they live, can access the best quality treatments and care. The evidence generated will be used to ensure that lung cancer services are developed to meet the needs of rural, coastal, and urban communities. The findings will inform the development of an intervention to support patient engagement with their recommended lung cancer pathway.

PROTOCOL REGISTRATION

The study received NHS Research Ethics Committee (Ref: 23/SC/0255) and NHS Health Research Authority (IRAS ID 328531) approval on 04/08/2023. The study was prospectively registered on Open Science Framework (16/10/2023; https://osf.io/njq48 ).

摘要

背景

肺癌是英国第三大常见癌症,也是全球癌症死亡的主要原因。英格兰国民保健署(NHS England)优化肺癌护理的指南建议由专家团队进行管理和治疗,专家集中在一个地方,提供专门的诊断和治疗设施。然而,肺癌的诊断和治疗途径复杂且快速演变,加上劳动力的限制,使得实现这一目标具有挑战性。这项基于地点的、受行为科学启发的定性研究旨在探讨人与专家服务的相对位置的相关特征如何相互作用,从而影响他们对最佳肺癌途径的参与,并比较和对比农村、沿海和城市社区的经验。该研究还旨在生成可转化的证据,为改善肺癌患者和非正式照顾者参与和体验肺癌护理途径的患者参与干预措施提供循证设计依据。

方法

一项定性的横断面访谈研究,纳入在招募前 6 个月内被诊断为肺癌的患者(接受手术、根治性放疗或患有晚期疾病)及其非正式照顾者。参与者将从 Barts Health NHS 信托基金和联合林肯郡医院 NHS 信托基金有目的地招募,以确保在城市和农村环境中具有多样化的样本。半结构化访谈将探讨影响个人参与其推荐的诊断和治疗途径的能力、机会和动机的因素。一个框架方法,受 COMB 模型的启发,将用于对促进和阻碍患者参与的因素进行主题分析。

讨论

该研究符合当前的政策重点,即确保无论患者居住在哪里,都能获得最佳质量的治疗和护理。所产生的证据将用于确保开发肺癌服务以满足农村、沿海和城市社区的需求。研究结果将为支持患者参与其推荐的肺癌途径的干预措施的制定提供信息。

协议注册

该研究于 2023 年 8 月 4 日获得了英国国民保健署(NHS England)研究伦理委员会(编号:23/SC/0255)和英国国民保健署(NHS)健康研究管理局(IRAS ID 328531)的批准。该研究于 2023 年 10 月 16 日在开放科学框架上进行了前瞻性注册(https://osf.io/njq48 )。