Suppr超能文献

骨盖技术与标准技术治疗下颌病变的比较。

Bone lid technique versus standard technique for treatment of mandibular lesions.

机构信息

Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Tanta University, El-Giesh St, Tanta, Gharbia, Egypt.

Oral Medicine, Periodontology, Oral Diagnosis and Radiology Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Tanta University, El-Giesh St, Tanta, Gharbia, Egypt.

出版信息

BMC Oral Health. 2024 Aug 2;24(1):875. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04594-y.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Jaw lesions are frequent in the oral and maxillofacial areas. Different methods for enucleating jaw lesions in the oral and maxillofacial sites have been proposed, including the bone lid technique.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and radiographic results of the bone lid technique employing a piezoelectric surgery to the traditional technique in individuals with mandibular lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A randomized controlled trial was conducted on 24 patients with mandibular lesions. They were randomly allocated into two groups (n = 12 for each group). Group I: the mandibular lesion was excised with bone lid technique using a piezoelectric device, followed by the fixation of the bony window after its repositioning. Group II: the lesion was excised with the traditional method using rotatory burs. Pain, soft tissue healing, bone exposure, bone lid integration, and the volume of the residual bone defect were all assessed clinically and radiographically after one week, one month, and six months.

RESULTS

All patients in both groups showed adequate soft tissue healing except for one case in group I experienced wound dehiscence and bone lid exposure. The bone lid group reported significantly less pain than the usual approach at the 3rd and 7th days. After six months, the volume of bone defect filling was considerably higher in the bone lid group compared to the conventional group.

CONCLUSION

The bone lid technique was an effective procedure in the management of mandibular lesions compared to the standard method. Besides, this technique provides better bone healing and reduces bone loss.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This clinical trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov on 14/8/2023 and had registration number NCT05987930.

摘要

背景

口腔颌面部经常发生颌骨病变。为了切除口腔颌面部的颌骨病变,已经提出了不同的方法,包括骨瓣技术。

目的

本研究旨在比较采用压电手术的骨瓣技术与传统技术在颌骨病变患者中的临床和影像学结果。

材料和方法

对 24 例颌骨病变患者进行了随机对照试验。他们被随机分为两组(每组 12 例)。组 I:采用压电设备的骨瓣技术切除下颌骨病变,然后在重新定位后固定骨窗。组 II:采用传统方法用旋转锉切除病变。在术后一周、一个月和六个月时,分别从临床和影像学评估疼痛、软组织愈合、骨暴露、骨瓣融合和残余骨缺损体积。

结果

两组所有患者的软组织愈合均良好,除组 I 中有一例出现伤口裂开和骨瓣暴露。骨瓣组在第 3 天和第 7 天报告的疼痛明显低于常规组。术后 6 个月,骨瓣组的骨缺损填充体积明显高于常规组。

结论

与标准方法相比,骨瓣技术是一种治疗下颌骨病变的有效方法。此外,该技术可提供更好的骨愈合和减少骨丢失。

试验注册

该临床试验于 2023 年 8 月 14 日在 clinicaltrials.gov 上注册,注册号为 NCT05987930。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/880d/11295513/dbdf993e2171/12903_2024_4594_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验