Suppr超能文献

骨盖技术与传统技术在下颌骨后部病变手术治疗中的比较:一项随机对照试验

Comparison Between the Bone Lid Technique and the Traditional Technique in Surgical Treatment of the Posterior Mandibular Lesions: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Abu Hawa Mohamad Husam, Shehri Zaed, Alkhouri Issam

机构信息

Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, University of Damascus Dental School, Damascus, SYR.

出版信息

Cureus. 2022 Jun 22;14(6):e26223. doi: 10.7759/cureus.26223. eCollection 2022 Jun.

Abstract

Introduction Cystic lesions of the jaws and the impacted teeth are two of the most common cases that require surgical intervention in oral and maxillofacial surgery; however, surgeons also frequently use a traditional technique that involves the removal of the buccal bone plate. This study was conducted to compare the clinical and radiologic outcomes of the bone lid technique and the traditional technique. Methods This randomized controlled trial included 20 patients who were randomly divided into two groups (n = 10 each): the T group, in which the lesions were accessed using the traditional technique with classical rotating instruments, and the BL group, in which the lesions were accessed with the bone lid technique performed using a piezoelectric device, with repositioning of the buccal bone plate. Operative time, pain, edema, inferior alveolar nerve injury, and bone defect healing were measured during clinical and radiological follow-ups at 24 h, 72 h, one week, one month, and six months after the surgery. Results Normal soft tissue and bone healing were observed in all cases except one case in the BL group. The T group had a shorter mean operative time than the BL group. In terms of pain, edema, and inferior alveolar nerve injury, the groups did not differ statistically significantly. The percentage of bone defect healing was significantly greater in the BL group than in the T group after six months of follow-up. Conclusion The bone lid technique performed using a piezoelectric device was effective and safe for managing lesions in the posterior mandibular region and was not associated with increased postoperative complications. The disadvantages of this technique include a longer operative time and the need for fixation tools in some cases. In contrast, this technique outperforms the traditional technique in terms of reducing bone loss and improving the healing of bone defects.

摘要

引言 颌骨囊性病变和阻生牙是口腔颌面外科中最常见的需要手术干预的两种病例;然而,外科医生也经常使用一种涉及去除颊侧骨板的传统技术。本研究旨在比较骨盖技术和传统技术的临床及影像学结果。

方法 本随机对照试验纳入20例患者,随机分为两组(每组n = 10):T组,采用传统技术使用经典旋转器械进入病变部位;BL组,采用使用压电装置进行的骨盖技术进入病变部位,并将颊侧骨板复位。在术后24小时、72小时、1周、1个月和6个月的临床及影像学随访期间,测量手术时间、疼痛、水肿、下牙槽神经损伤和骨缺损愈合情况。

结果 除BL组1例外,所有病例均观察到软组织和骨正常愈合。T组的平均手术时间比BL组短。在疼痛、水肿和下牙槽神经损伤方面,两组在统计学上无显著差异。随访6个月后,BL组的骨缺损愈合百分比显著高于T组。

结论 使用压电装置进行的骨盖技术在处理下颌后牙区病变时有效且安全,且与术后并发症增加无关。该技术的缺点包括手术时间较长以及在某些情况下需要固定工具。相比之下,该技术在减少骨丢失和改善骨缺损愈合方面优于传统技术。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba9b/9312524/e6eb86f21da4/cureus-0014-00000026223-i01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验