Suppr超能文献

交联型和非交联型透明质酸预防术后跟腱粘连的效果:一项大鼠模型研究。

The results of preventing postoperative achilles tendon adhesion using cross-linked and non-cross-linked hyaluronic acid, a study with rat model.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Jen-Ai Hospital, 483 Dong Rong Rd, Taichung City, Taiwan.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.

出版信息

J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Aug 2;19(1):457. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04952-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There are many adhesion barrier materials, cross-linked or non-cross-linked hyaluronic acid (HA), used during surgeries.

PURPOSE

This study investigates the efficacy of cross-linked and non-cross-linked HA in preventing Achilles tendon adhesions. We hypothesized that non-cross-linked HA may be more effective than cross-linked HA in preventing Achilles tendon adhesions following injury and repair.

METHODS

Twenty male Sprague Dawley rats, totaling 40 legs, underwent Achilles tendon transection and repair. Following the surgery, they were treated simultaneously with cross-linked and non-cross-linked HA formulations. The rats were divided into four groups: a positive control group, a group treated with BMC non-cross-linked HA gel, a group treated with DEFEHERE cross-linked HA gel, and a group treated with ANIKA cross-linked HA gel. Four weeks after surgery, macroscopic evaluation of peritendinous adhesion and histological analysis were conducted to assess the effectiveness of the treatments.

RESULTS

Non-cross-linked BMC HA demonstrated superior efficacy in preventing tendon adhesions compared to cross-linked HA and control groups. Histological analysis confirmed reduced adhesion severity in the non-cross-linked HA group (P < 0.05). The findings support the potential of non-cross-linked HA as a treatment to inhibit tendon adhesions. Further research, including clinical trials, is warranted to validate these results in human subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-cross-linked BMC HA had significantly lower tendon adhesions parameters and better healing scores in histological analysis than cross-linked HA and control group did. Non-cross-linked HA holds promise as a potential treatment to inhibit the formation of such adhesions.

摘要

背景

在手术中,有许多粘连屏障材料,包括交联和非交联的透明质酸(HA)。

目的

本研究旨在探讨交联和非交联 HA 在预防跟腱粘连中的效果。我们假设,在损伤和修复后,非交联 HA 可能比交联 HA 更能预防跟腱粘连。

方法

20 只雄性 Sprague Dawley 大鼠,共 40 条腿,进行跟腱横断和修复。手术后,同时用交联和非交联 HA 制剂进行治疗。大鼠分为四组:阳性对照组、BMC 非交联 HA 凝胶组、DEFEHERE 交联 HA 凝胶组和 ANIKA 交联 HA 凝胶组。手术后 4 周,进行肌腱周围粘连的宏观评估和组织学分析,以评估治疗效果。

结果

非交联 BMC HA 在预防肌腱粘连方面比交联 HA 和对照组更有效。组织学分析证实,非交联 HA 组粘连程度较轻(P<0.05)。这些发现支持非交联 HA 作为抑制肌腱粘连的治疗方法的潜力。需要进一步的研究,包括临床试验,以验证这些结果在人类受试者中的应用。

结论

非交联 BMC HA 在组织学分析中具有较低的肌腱粘连参数和更好的愈合评分,比交联 HA 和对照组更优。非交联 HA 有望成为抑制这种粘连形成的潜在治疗方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/686f/11295680/71465e24a2c4/13018_2024_4952_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验