Suppr超能文献

单针法临时回肠造口术是否会影响直肠癌腹腔镜低位前切除术后的吻合口相关并发症?

Does one-stitch method of temporary ileostomy affect the stoma-related complications after laparoscopic low anterior resection in rectal cancer patients?

机构信息

Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China.

出版信息

Eur J Med Res. 2024 Aug 2;29(1):403. doi: 10.1186/s40001-024-01995-1.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This current study attempted to investigate whether one-stitch method (OM) of temporary ileostomy influenced the stoma-related complications after laparoscopic low anterior resection (LLAR).

METHODS

We searched for eligible studies in four databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and CNKI from inception to July 20, 2023. Both surgical outcomes and stoma-related complications were compared between the OM group and the traditional method (TM) group. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was adopted for quality assessment. RevMan 5.4 was conducted for data analyzing.

RESULTS

Totally 590 patients from six studies were enrolled in this study (272 patients in the OM group and 318 patients in the TM group). No significant difference was found in baseline information (P > 0.05). Patients in the OM group had shorter operative time in both the primary LLAR surgery (MD = - 17.73, 95%CI = - 25.65 to - 9.80, P < 0.01) and the stoma reversal surgery (MD = - 18.70, 95%CI = - 22.48 to -14.92, P < 0.01) than patients in the TM group. There was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss of the primary LLAR surgery (MD = - 2.92, 95%CI = - 7.15 to 1.32, P = 0.18). Moreover, patients in the OM group had fewer stoma-related complications than patients in the TM group (OR = 0.55, 95%CI = 0.38 to 0.79, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The OM group had shorter operation time in both the primary LLAR surgery and the stoma reversal surgery than the TM group. Moreover, the OM group had less stoma-related complications.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨单针法临时造口术(OM)是否会影响腹腔镜低位前切除术(LLAR)后的造口相关并发症。

方法

我们在四个数据库(PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library 和中国知网)中检索了从成立到 2023 年 7 月 20 日的符合条件的研究。比较了 OM 组和传统方法(TM)组之间的手术结果和造口相关并发症。采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)进行质量评估。采用 RevMan 5.4 进行数据分析。

结果

共有 6 项研究的 590 名患者纳入本研究(OM 组 272 名,TM 组 318 名)。两组基线信息无统计学差异(P>0.05)。OM 组在原发 LLAR 手术(MD=-17.73,95%CI=-25.65 至-9.80,P<0.01)和造口反转手术(MD=-18.70,95%CI=-22.48 至-14.92,P<0.01)中的手术时间均较短。原发 LLAR 手术中两组术中出血量无统计学差异(MD=-2.92,95%CI=-7.15 至 1.32,P=0.18)。此外,OM 组的造口相关并发症少于 TM 组(OR=0.55,95%CI=0.38 至 0.79,P<0.01)。

结论

与 TM 组相比,OM 组在原发 LLAR 手术和造口反转手术中的手术时间均较短。此外,OM 组的造口相关并发症较少。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b9a7/11297555/b76190806793/40001_2024_1995_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验