Yih W Katherine, Duffy Jonathan, Su John R, Bazel Samaneh, Fireman Bruce, Hurley Laura, Maro Judith C, Marquez Paige, Moro Pedro, Nair Narayan, Nelson Jennifer, Smith Ning, Sundaram Maria, Vasquez-Benitez Gabriela, Weintraub Eric, Xu Stanley, Shimabukuro Tom
Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute and Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Immunization Safety Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.
Am J Otolaryngol. 2024 Nov-Dec;45(6):104448. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2024.104448. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
To assess the occurrence of tinnitus following COVID-19 vaccination using data mining and descriptive analyses in two U.S. vaccine safety surveillance systems.
Reports of tinnitus after COVID-19 vaccination to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) from 2020 through 2024 were examined using empirical Bayesian data mining and by calculating reporting rates. In the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) population, ICD-10 coded post-vaccination medical visits were examined using tree-based data mining, and tinnitus visit incidence rates during post-vaccination days 1-140 were calculated by age group for COVID-19 vaccines and for comparison, influenza vaccine.
VAERS data mining did not find disproportionate reporting of tinnitus for any COVID-19 vaccine. VAERS received up to 84.82 tinnitus reports per million COVID-19 vaccine doses administered. VSD tree-based data mining found no signals for tinnitus. VSD tinnitus visit incidence rates after COVID-19 vaccines were similar to those after influenza vaccine except for the group aged ≥65 years (Moderna COVID-19 vaccine, 165 per 10,000 person-years; Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, 154; influenza vaccine, 135).
Overall, these findings do not support an increased risk of tinnitus following COVID-19 vaccination but cannot definitively exclude the possibility. Descriptive comparisons between COVID-19 and influenza vaccines were limited by lack of adjustment for potential confounding factors.
利用美国两个疫苗安全监测系统的数据挖掘和描述性分析,评估新冠病毒疫苗接种后耳鸣的发生情况。
使用经验贝叶斯数据挖掘并计算报告率,对2020年至2024年向疫苗不良事件报告系统(VAERS)报告的新冠病毒疫苗接种后耳鸣情况进行检查。在疫苗安全数据链(VSD)人群中,使用基于树的数据挖掘方法检查接种疫苗后按国际疾病分类第十版(ICD-10)编码的就诊情况,并按年龄组计算新冠病毒疫苗接种后第1至140天的耳鸣就诊发病率,同时以流感疫苗作为对照进行计算。
VAERS数据挖掘未发现任何新冠病毒疫苗的耳鸣报告存在不成比例的情况。每接种100万剂新冠病毒疫苗,VAERS最多收到84.82例耳鸣报告。VSD基于树的数据挖掘未发现耳鸣信号。除≥65岁年龄组外,新冠病毒疫苗接种后的VSD耳鸣就诊发病率与流感疫苗接种后的相似(Moderna新冠病毒疫苗,每10000人年165例;辉瑞 - BioNTech新冠病毒疫苗,154例;流感疫苗,135例)。
总体而言,这些发现不支持新冠病毒疫苗接种后耳鸣风险增加,但不能完全排除这种可能性。新冠病毒疫苗和流感疫苗之间的描述性比较因缺乏对潜在混杂因素的调整而受到限制。