Suppr超能文献

截断历史数据对奶绵羊选种候选者预测能力的影响。

Impact of truncating historical data on prediction ability of dairy sheep selection candidates.

机构信息

Department of Animal Production, NEIKER - Basque Institute of Agricultural Research and Development, Basque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA), Agrifood Campus of Arkaute s/n, Arkaute 01192, Spain.

Department of Animal Production, NEIKER - Basque Institute of Agricultural Research and Development, Basque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA), Agrifood Campus of Arkaute s/n, Arkaute 01192, Spain.

出版信息

Animal. 2024 Aug;18(8):101245. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101245. Epub 2024 Jul 9.

Abstract

Along the last decades, the genetic evaluation methodology has evolved, improving breeding value estimates. Many breeding programmes have historical phenotypic records and large number of generations, but to make use of them could result in more inconveniences than benefits. In this study, the prediction ability of genotyped young animals was assessed by simultaneously evaluating the removal of historical data, two pedigree deepness and two methodologies (traditional BLUP and single-step genomic BLUP or ssGBLUP), using milk yield records of 40 years of three Latxa dairy sheep populations. The linear regression method was used to compare predictions of young rams before and after progeny testing, with six cut-off points, by intervals of 4 years (from 1992 to 2012), and statistics of ratio of accuracies, bias, and dispersion were calculated. The prediction accuracy of selection candidates, when genomic information was included, was the highest in all Latxa populations (between 0.54 and 0.69 with full data set). Nevertheless, the deletion of historical phenotypic data resulted on moderate accuracy gain in the bigger data size populations (mean gain 2.5%), and the smaller population took advantage of a moderate data deletion (2.7% gain by removing data until 2004), reducing accuracy when more records were removed. The bias of validation individuals was lower when the breeding value was predicted based on genomic information (between 2.1 and 13.9), being lower when the biggest amount of data was deleted in the bigger data size populations (5.2% reduction), and the smaller population was benefited from data deletion between 1996 and 2008 (3.8% bias reduction). Meanwhile, the slope of estimated genetic trend was lower when less data were included, and an overestimation of the unknown parent group estimates was observed. The results indicated that ssGBLUP evaluations were outstanding, compared with traditional BLUP evaluations, while the depth of pedigree had a very small influence, and deletion of historical phenotypic data was beneficial. Thus, Latxa routine genetic evaluations would benefit from truncating phenotypic records between 2000 and 2004, the use of two pedigree generations and the implementation of ssGBLUP methodology.

摘要

在过去的几十年中,遗传评估方法不断发展,提高了育种值估计的准确性。许多育种计划都有历史表型记录和多代数据,但利用这些数据可能会带来更多的不便,而不是好处。本研究通过同时评估历史数据的删除、两种系谱深度和两种方法(传统 BLUP 和单步基因组 BLUP 或 ssGBLUP),利用三个拉塔克斯奶绵羊群体 40 年的产奶记录,评估了基因型年轻动物的预测能力。线性回归法用于比较在进行后裔测试前后年轻公羊的预测结果,使用了六个截止点,间隔为 4 年(从 1992 年到 2012 年),并计算了准确性比、偏差和离散度的统计数据。在所有拉塔克斯群体中,当包含基因组信息时,选择候选者的预测准确性最高(全数据集为 0.54 至 0.69)。然而,删除历史表型数据会导致较大数据规模群体的预测准确性适度提高(平均提高 2.5%),而较小的群体则受益于适度的数据删除(2004 年以前的数据删除提高 2.7%),当删除更多记录时,准确性会降低。当基于基因组信息预测育种值时,验证个体的偏差较低(2.1 至 13.9),在较大数据规模群体中删除最大量的数据时,偏差降低(减少 5.2%),而较小的群体则受益于 1996 年至 2008 年之间的数据删除(偏差降低 3.8%)。同时,当包含的数据较少时,估计遗传趋势的斜率较低,并且观察到对未知亲本群体估计的高估。结果表明,ssGBLUP 评估明显优于传统 BLUP 评估,而系谱深度的影响很小,删除历史表型数据是有益的。因此,Latxa 常规遗传评估将受益于删除 2000 年至 2004 年之间的表型记录、使用两代系谱和实施 ssGBLUP 方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验