Department of Haematology, Cancer Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
J Thromb Haemost. 2024 Nov;22(11):2945-2960. doi: 10.1016/j.jtha.2024.07.012. Epub 2024 Aug 2.
Adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector gene therapy provides a promising platform for treatment of monogenic inherited disorders. Clinical studies have demonstrated long-term expression with reduction in bleeding using this approach for the treatment of hemophilia. Despite these advances, there are unknowns surrounding the natural history of recombinant AAV (rAAV) vectors and the cellular mechanisms mediating vector persistence. These unknowns underpin questions regarding long-term efficacy and safety. The predominant mechanism via which AAV is proposed to persist is in circular double-stranded extrachromosomal DNA structures (episomes) within the nucleus. Studies of wild-type AAV (WT-AAV) and rAAV have demonstrated that AAV also persists via integration into a host cell's DNA. It is important to determine whether these integration events can mediate expression or could result in any long-term safety concerns. WT-AAV infection affects a large proportion of the general population, which is thought to have no long-term sequelae. Recent studies have highlighted that this WT-AAV has been detected in cases of acute hepatitis in children and in a minority of cases of hepatocellular carcinoma. Integration following treatment using rAAV has also been reported in preclinical and clinical studies. There have been variable reports on the potential implications of integration for rAAV vectors, with data in some murine studies demonstrating recurrent integration with development of hepatocellular carcinoma. These findings have not been seen in other preclinical or clinical studies. In this review, we will summarize current understanding of the natural history of AAV (wild-type and recombinant) with a focus on genomic integration and cellular implications.
腺相关病毒 (AAV) 载体基因治疗为治疗单基因遗传性疾病提供了一个有前途的平台。临床研究表明,使用这种方法治疗血友病可以长期表达并减少出血。尽管取得了这些进展,但关于重组 AAV(rAAV) 载体的自然史和介导载体持久性的细胞机制仍存在未知。这些未知数是关于长期疗效和安全性的问题的基础。AAV 被认为持续存在的主要机制是在细胞核内的环状双链游离态 DNA 结构 (附加体) 中。对野生型 AAV (WT-AAV) 和 rAAV 的研究表明,AAV 也通过整合到宿主细胞的 DNA 中而持续存在。重要的是要确定这些整合事件是否可以介导表达,或者是否会导致任何长期的安全问题。WT-AAV 感染影响了很大一部分普通人群,据认为不会有长期的后遗症。最近的研究强调,这种 WT-AAV 已在儿童急性肝炎和少数肝细胞癌病例中被检测到。在临床前和临床研究中也报道了 rAAV 治疗后整合的情况。关于整合对 rAAV 载体的潜在影响的报告存在差异,一些小鼠研究的数据表明,随着肝细胞癌的发展,反复发生整合。在其他临床前或临床研究中尚未见到这些发现。在这篇综述中,我们将总结 AAV(野生型和重组型)的自然史的当前理解,重点是基因组整合和细胞影响。