Centre for Cardiovascular Science, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Open Heart. 2024 Aug 3;11(2):e002755. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2024-002755.
Guidelines recommend the use of risk scores to select patients for further investigation after myocardial infarction has been ruled out but their utility to identify those with coronary artery disease is uncertain.
In a prospective cohort study, patients with intermediate high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I concentrations (5 ng/L to sex-specific 99th percentile) in whom myocardial infarction was ruled out were enrolled and underwent coronary CT angiography (CCTA) after hospital discharge. History, ECG, Age, Risk factors, Troponin (HEART), Emergency Department Assessment of Chest Pain Score (EDACS), Global Registry of Acute Coronary Event (GRACE), Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI), Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation 2 and Pooled Cohort Equation risk scores were calculated and the odds ratio (OR) and diagnostic performance for obstructive coronary artery disease were determined using established thresholds.
Of 167 patients enrolled (64±12 years, 28% female), 29.9% (50/167) had obstructive coronary artery disease. The odds of having obstructive disease were increased for all scores with the lowest and highest increase observed for an EDACS score ≥16 (OR 2.2 (1.1-4.6)) and a TIMI risk score ≥1 (OR 12.9 (3.0-56.0)), respectively. The positive predictive value (PPV) was low for all scores but was highest for a GRACE score >88 identifying 39% as high risk with a PPV of 41.9% (30.4-54.2%). The negative predictive value (NPV) varied from 77.3% to 95.2% but was highest for a TIMI score of 0 identifying 26% as low risk with an NPV of 95.2% (87.2-100%).
In patients with intermediate cardiac troponin concentrations in whom myocardial infarction has been excluded, clinical risk scores can help identify patients with and without coronary artery disease, although the performance of established risk thresholds is suboptimal for utilisation in clinical practice.
NCT04549805.
指南建议使用风险评分来选择排除心肌梗死后的进一步检查患者,但它们用于识别有冠状动脉疾病的患者的效用尚不确定。
在一项前瞻性队列研究中,纳入了中间高敏肌钙蛋白 I 浓度(5ng/L 至性别特异性第 99 百分位数)且排除了心肌梗死的患者,并在出院后进行冠状动脉 CT 血管造影(CCTA)。计算了病史、心电图、年龄、危险因素、肌钙蛋白(HEART)、急诊胸痛评估评分(EDACS)、全球急性冠状动脉事件注册(GRACE)、血栓溶解治疗心肌梗死(TIMI)、系统性冠状动脉风险评估 2 和 Pooled Cohort Equation 风险评分,并使用既定阈值确定了阻塞性冠状动脉疾病的比值比(OR)和诊断性能。
共纳入 167 例患者(64±12 岁,28%为女性),其中 29.9%(50/167)存在阻塞性冠状动脉疾病。所有评分的阻塞性疾病的可能性均增加,EDACS 评分≥16(OR 2.2(1.1-4.6))和 TIMI 风险评分≥1(OR 12.9(3.0-56.0))的增加幅度最低和最高。所有评分的阳性预测值(PPV)均较低,但 GRACE 评分>88 识别出的高风险患者的 PPV 最高,为 41.9%(30.4-54.2%)。阴性预测值(NPV)从 77.3%到 95.2%不等,但 TIMI 评分为 0 时的 NPV 最高,识别出的低风险患者的 NPV 为 95.2%(87.2-100%)。
在排除心肌梗死后中间心肌肌钙蛋白浓度的患者中,临床风险评分可以帮助识别有和无冠状动脉疾病的患者,尽管既定风险阈值的性能不适用于临床实践。
NCT04549805。