Ferencik Maros, Liu Ting, Mayrhofer Thomas, Puchner Stefan B, Lu Michael T, Maurovich-Horvat Pal, Pope J Hector, Truong Quynh A, Udelson James E, Peacock W Frank, White Charles S, Woodard Pamela K, Fleg Jerome L, Nagurney John T, Januzzi James L, Hoffmann Udo
Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR.
Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Nov;8(11):1272-1281. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.06.016. Epub 2015 Oct 14.
This study compared diagnostic accuracy of conventional troponin/traditional coronary artery disease (CAD) assessment and highly sensitive troponin (hsTn) I/advanced CAD assessment for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) during the index hospitalization.
hsTnI and advanced assessment of CAD using coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) are promising candidates to improve the accuracy of emergency department evaluation of patients with suspected ACS.
We performed an observational cohort study in patients with suspected ACS enrolled in the ROMICAT II (Rule Out Myocardial Infarction/Ischemia using Computer Assisted Tomography) trial and randomized to coronary CTA who also had hsTnI measurement at the time of the emergency department presentation. We assessed coronary CTA for traditional (no CAD, nonobstructive CAD, ≥50% stenosis) and advanced features of CAD (≥50% stenosis, high-risk plaque features: positive remodeling, low <30-Hounsfield units plaque, napkin-ring sign, spotty calcium).
Of 160 patients (mean age: 53 ± 8 years, 40% women) 10.6% were diagnosed with ACS. The ACS rate in patients with hsTnI below the limit of detection (n = 9, 5.6%), intermediate (n = 139, 86.9%), and above the 99th percentile (n = 12, 7.5%) was 0%, 8.6%, and 58.3%, respectively. Absence of ≥50% stenosis and high-risk plaque ruled out ACS in patients with intermediate hsTnI (n = 87, 54.4%; ACS rate 0%), whereas patients with both ≥50% stenosis and high-risk plaque were at high risk (n = 13, 8.1%; ACS rate 69.2%) and patients with either ≥50% stenosis or high-risk plaque were at intermediate risk for ACS (n = 39, 24.4%; ACS rate 7.7%). hsTnI/advanced coronary CTA assessment significantly improved the diagnostic accuracy for ACS as compared to conventional troponin/traditional coronary CTA (area under the curve 0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.80 to .88 vs. 0.74, 95% CI: 0.70 to 0.78; p < 0.001).
hsTnI at the time of presentation followed by early advanced coronary CTA assessment improves the risk stratification and diagnostic accuracy for ACS as compared to conventional troponin and traditional coronary CTA assessment. (Multicenter Study to Rule Out Myocardial Infarction/Ischemia by Cardiac Computed Tomography [ROMICAT-II]; NCT01084239).
本研究比较了在首次住院期间,传统肌钙蛋白/传统冠状动脉疾病(CAD)评估与高敏肌钙蛋白(hsTn)I/高级CAD评估对急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)的诊断准确性。
hsTnI以及使用冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影(CTA)对CAD进行的高级评估有望提高急诊科对疑似ACS患者评估的准确性。
我们对参加ROMICAT II(使用计算机辅助断层扫描排除心肌梗死/缺血)试验且被随机分配接受冠状动脉CTA检查、在急诊科就诊时也进行了hsTnI测量的疑似ACS患者进行了一项观察性队列研究。我们评估冠状动脉CTA的传统特征(无CAD、非阻塞性CAD、≥50%狭窄)和CAD的高级特征(≥50%狭窄、高危斑块特征:阳性重塑、低密度<30亨氏单位斑块、餐巾环征、斑点状钙化)。
160例患者(平均年龄:53±8岁,40%为女性)中,10.6%被诊断为ACS。hsTnI低于检测下限的患者(n = 9,5.6%)、处于中间水平的患者(n = 139,86.9%)和高于第99百分位数的患者(n = 12,7.5%)的ACS发生率分别为0%、8.6%和58.3%。hsTnI处于中间水平的患者中,不存在≥50%狭窄和高危斑块可排除ACS(n = 87,54.4%;ACS发生率0%),而同时存在≥50%狭窄和高危斑块的患者处于高风险(n = 13,8.1%;ACS发生率69.2%),存在≥50%狭窄或高危斑块之一的患者处于ACS的中间风险(n = 39,24.4%;ACS发生率7.7%)。与传统肌钙蛋白/传统冠状动脉CTA相比,hsTnI/高级冠状动脉CTA评估显著提高了ACS的诊断准确性(曲线下面积0.84,95%置信区间[CI]:0.80至0.88 vs. 0.74,95%CI:0.70至0.78;p<0.001)。
与传统肌钙蛋白和传统冠状动脉CTA评估相比,就诊时的hsTnI随后进行早期高级冠状动脉CTA评估可改善ACS的风险分层和诊断准确性。(通过心脏计算机断层扫描排除心肌梗死/缺血的多中心研究[ROMICAT-II];NCT01084239)