• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

眼表参数重复性和一致性——Keratograph 5M 与 IDRA 的比较。

Ocular surface parameters repeatability and agreement -A comparison between Keratograph 5M and IDRA.

机构信息

Centre for Eye and Vision Research (CEVR), 17W Hong Kong Science Park, Hong Kong.

Centre for Eye and Vision Research (CEVR), 17W Hong Kong Science Park, Hong Kong; Centre for Myopia Research, School of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong.

出版信息

Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2024 Dec;47(6):102281. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2024.102281. Epub 2024 Aug 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.clae.2024.102281
PMID:39097427
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the repeatability and agreement in dry eye measurements using Oculus Keratograph 5M (K5M) and SBM Sistemi IDRA (IDRA).

METHODS

A total of 108 participants were enrolled and 108 eyes were evaluated. Tear meniscus height (TMH) and first and average non-invasive break-up time (NIBUT) were measured using the K5M and IDRA (order randomly assigned). TMH was measured using the built-in caliper tool while NIBUT was computed by the automatic algorithm of the instruments.

RESULTS

The Bland Altman plots analysis showed a good agreement between the two instruments for TMH (95 % Limits of Agreement (LoA), -0.17 to 0.16), but not the first NIBUT (95 % LoA, -8.13 to 14.79) and average NIBUT (95 % LoA, -7.89 to 10.32). The values of the first and average NIBUT measured using IDRA were significantly shorter than in K5M (difference = median (IQR) -2.75 (-6.48- -0.28)s, p < 0.001 and difference = median (IQR) -1.65 (-3.97-1.89)s, p = 0.008 respectively). The TMH (p = 0.037) and NIBUT average (p = 0.033) measured by K5M, as well as the TMH (p = 0.040) measured by IDRA, exhibited unstable measurements across the three measurement times. The remaining parameters exhibited stability with three repeated measurements.

CONCLUSION

The NIBUT measurements are not interchangeable between IDRA and K5M, while the TMH was little difference between the two instruments. It is important to exercise caution when using different ocular surface analyzers to minimize errors in comparing multiple measurements.

摘要

目的

评估使用 Oculus Keratograph 5M(K5M)和 SBM Sistemi IDRA(IDRA)进行干眼测量的重复性和一致性。

方法

共纳入 108 名参与者,共评估 108 只眼。使用 K5M 和 IDRA(随机分配顺序)测量泪膜弯曲度(TMH)和首次及平均非侵入性泪膜破裂时间(NIBUT)。使用内置卡尺工具测量 TMH,而 NIBUT 则由仪器的自动算法计算。

结果

Bland Altman 图分析显示两种仪器测量 TMH 的一致性较好(95%一致性界限(LoA),-0.17 至 0.16),但首次 NIBUT(95% LoA,-8.13 至 14.79)和平均 NIBUT(95% LoA,-7.89 至 10.32)的一致性较差。使用 IDRA 测量的首次和平均 NIBUT 值明显短于 K5M(差异=中位数(IQR)-2.75(-6.48-0.28)s,p<0.001 和差异=中位数(IQR)-1.65(-3.97-1.89)s,p=0.008)。K5M 测量的 TMH(p=0.037)和平均 NIBUT(p=0.033)以及 IDRA 测量的 TMH(p=0.040)在三个测量时间点的测量值均不稳定。其余参数在三次重复测量中表现出稳定性。

结论

IDRA 和 K5M 之间的 NIBUT 测量值不可互换,而两种仪器之间的 TMH 差异较小。使用不同的眼表面分析仪时,应谨慎操作,以最大程度地减少比较多次测量时的误差。

相似文献

1
Ocular surface parameters repeatability and agreement -A comparison between Keratograph 5M and IDRA.眼表参数重复性和一致性——Keratograph 5M 与 IDRA 的比较。
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2024 Dec;47(6):102281. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2024.102281. Epub 2024 Aug 2.
2
Evaluation of tear film function by Oculus Keratograph 5M and IDRA ocular surface analyser.应用 Oculus Keratograph 5M 和 IDRA 眼表分析仪评估泪膜功能。
Int Ophthalmol. 2024 Oct 4;44(1):403. doi: 10.1007/s10792-024-03262-y.
3
Repeatability, reproducibility and agreement between three different diagnostic imaging platforms for tear film evaluation of normal and dry eye disease.三种不同诊断成像平台评估正常和干眼疾病泪膜的重复性、可再现性和一致性。
Eye (Lond). 2023 Jul;37(10):2042-2047. doi: 10.1038/s41433-022-02281-2. Epub 2022 Oct 19.
4
Repeatability of Non-invasive Tear Film Evaluation in Healthy Rabbit Eyes.健康兔眼无创泪膜评估的可重复性。
Curr Eye Res. 2023 Aug;48(8):699-703. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2023.2200915. Epub 2023 Apr 12.
5
Intrasession repeatability and interobserver reproducibility of ICP Tearscope measurements of tear meniscus height and non-invasive breakup time.泪液半月板高度和无创泪膜破裂时间的眼内压泪液镜测量的会话内重复性和观察者间再现性。
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2025 Apr;48(2):102333. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2024.102333. Epub 2024 Nov 13.
6
Repeatability of Noninvasive Break-Up Time Measurements using Keratograph Oculus 3.使用角膜地形图仪 3 进行非侵入性破裂时间测量的重复性。
Cesk Slov Oftalmol. 2024;80(5):266-270. doi: 10.31348/2024/26.
7
Imaging the Tear Film: A Comparison Between the Subjective Keeler Tearscope-Plus™ and the Objective Oculus® Keratograph 5M and LipiView® Interferometer.泪膜成像:主观Keeler Tearscope-Plus™与客观Oculus® Keratograph 5M及LipiView®干涉仪的比较
Curr Eye Res. 2018 Feb;43(2):155-162. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2017.1393092. Epub 2017 Nov 14.
8
Repeatability of non-invasive break-up time measures with a new automated dry eye platform in healthy eyes.新型自动化干眼仪测量健康人非侵入性泪膜破裂时间的可重复性。
Int Ophthalmol. 2020 Nov;40(11):2855-2864. doi: 10.1007/s10792-020-01470-w. Epub 2020 Aug 9.
9
Comparison of Tear Meniscus Height Measurements Obtained With the Keratograph and Fourier Domain Optical Coherence Tomography in Dry Eye.使用角膜地形图仪和傅里叶域光学相干断层扫描测量干眼患者泪河高度的比较。
Cornea. 2015 Oct;34(10):1209-13. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000575.
10
Agreement of noninvasive tear break-up time measurement between Tomey RT-7000 Auto Refractor-Keratometer and Oculus Keratograph 5M.托梅 RT-7000 自动验光角膜曲率计与欧culus Keratograph 5M 之间非侵入性泪膜破裂时间测量的一致性。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2016 Sep 16;10:1785-1790. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S110180. eCollection 2016.