Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Eastern Mediterranean University, Famagusta, Northern Cyprus, Turkey.
Med Sci Monit. 2024 Aug 4;30:e945149. doi: 10.12659/MSM.945149.
BACKGROUND Cervical spondylosis (CS) is a degenerative disease of the cervical spine characterized by persistent neck pain. Cervical facet joint mobilization (CM) and the osteopathic muscle energy technique (MET) are effective manual procedures for the treatment of neck pain. In this study, we compared the efficacy of the MET and CM techniques on pain, disability, and proprioception in 76 patients with CS. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 96 participants with a diagnosis of CS were randomized into an electro-thermal therapy (ET) group (control group, n=32), ET+MET group (experiment I, n=32), and ET+CM group (experiment II, n=32). All patients received 3 treatment sessions per week for 4 consecutive weeks. Pain intensity, functional disability and cervical position sense were measured using the visual analog scale (VAS), Copenhagen Neck Functional Disability Scale (CNFDS), and cervical range of motion (CROM) device. RESULTS The study was completed by 76 participants. VAS and CNFDS scores decreased significantly after treatment in all 3 groups (P<0.001); however, there was no significant difference between the groups (P>0.05). Between-group analysis showed a significant difference in extension joint position error in favor of MET (P<0.001), while there was no significant difference between the groups in other movement directions (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS MET and CM have similar effects on improving pain and disability in individuals with CS and chronic neck pain. However, the results of this study show that MET combined with ET is a more effective method for improving cervical position sense.
背景:颈椎病(CS)是一种颈椎退行性疾病,其特征为持续性颈部疼痛。颈椎关节松动术(CM)和整骨肌肉能量技术(MET)是治疗颈部疼痛的有效手法治疗方法。在这项研究中,我们比较了 MET 和 CM 技术对 76 例 CS 患者疼痛、残疾和本体感觉的疗效。
材料与方法:共有 96 名 CS 诊断患者被随机分为电热疗法(ET)组(对照组,n=32)、ET+MET 组(实验 I,n=32)和 ET+CM 组(实验 II,n=32)。所有患者每周接受 3 次治疗,连续 4 周。采用视觉模拟评分(VAS)、哥本哈根颈部功能障碍量表(CNFDS)和颈椎活动范围(CROM)设备测量疼痛强度、功能障碍和颈椎位置感。
结果:本研究完成了 76 名参与者。所有 3 组治疗后 VAS 和 CNFDS 评分均显著降低(P<0.001);但组间无显著差异(P>0.05)。组间分析显示,伸展关节位置误差明显有利于 MET(P<0.001),而在其他运动方向上,组间无显著差异(P>0.05)。
结论:MET 和 CM 对改善 CS 和慢性颈痛患者的疼痛和残疾有相似的效果。然而,本研究结果表明,MET 联合 ET 是改善颈椎位置感的更有效方法。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019-10-15
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2024
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2021-6