Miao Qiang, Qiang Jian-Hong, Jin Yan-Li
Department of the Third Ward of Orthopedics Department of Chinese Medicine, The People's Hospital of Yan'an, Yan'an, China.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jun;97(26):e11080. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011080.
This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of percutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation (PNMES) for treating neck pain in patients with cervical spondylosis (CS).
One hundred and twenty four patients with neck pain of CS were included, and then they were randomly divided into a PNMES group and a control group in a ratio of 1:1. All patients received PNMES or sham PNMES 30 minutes daily, 3 times weekly for 12 weeks. The primary outcome was assessed by the visual analog scale (VAS). The secondary outcomes were evaluated by the cervical range of motion (ROM), neck disability index (NDI) score, as well as the adverse events (AEs). All outcome measurements were measured at the end of 12-week treatment, and 4-week follow-up after treatment.
At the end of the 12-week treatment, and 4-week follow-up, the patients receiving PNMES exhibited more decrease in the mean VAS (P < .01), and NDI (P < .01) respectively, compared with the patients receiving sham PNMES. Additionally, the increase in the mean ROM was also significantly higher in the PNMES group than that in the sham PNMES group at the end of the 12-week treatment, and 4-week follow-up, respectively (P < .01). No AEs were found in either group.
The results of this study demonstrated that PNMES is more effective than Sham PNMES for neck pain relief in patients with CS.
本研究旨在评估经皮神经肌肉电刺激(PNMES)治疗颈椎病(CS)患者颈部疼痛的有效性和安全性。
纳入124例CS颈部疼痛患者,然后按1:1比例随机分为PNMES组和对照组。所有患者每天接受30分钟的PNMES或假PNMES治疗,每周3次,共12周。主要结局通过视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估。次要结局通过颈椎活动范围(ROM)、颈部功能障碍指数(NDI)评分以及不良事件(AE)进行评估。所有结局指标均在12周治疗结束时及治疗后4周随访时测量。
在12周治疗结束时及4周随访时,与接受假PNMES治疗的患者相比,接受PNMES治疗的患者平均VAS(P<0.01)和NDI(P<0.01)的下降幅度更大。此外,在12周治疗结束时及4周随访时,PNMES组平均ROM的增加也显著高于假PNMES组(P<0.01)。两组均未发现不良事件。
本研究结果表明,PNMES在缓解CS患者颈部疼痛方面比假PNMES更有效。