Suppr超能文献

使用反馈控制超滤曲线进行血液透析中的血管再充盈。

Vascular refilling in hemodialysis using feedback-controlled ultrafiltration profile.

机构信息

Department of Nephrology DRK Clinics Berlin-Köpenick, Berlin, Germany.

KfH Kidney Center Berlin-Köpenick, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Artif Organs. 2024 Oct;47(10):723-728. doi: 10.1177/03913988241264709. Epub 2024 Aug 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The rate and the duration of ultrafiltration (UF) are considered the most important factors to affect vascular refilling. The aim of the study was to investigate whether a UF profile could improve the vascular refilling.

METHODS

Dialysis was delivered by a machine providing feedback control of ultrafiltration rates. Absolute blood volume (BV) was measured by dialysate bolus method. Vascular refilling volume () was calculated as UF volume - Δ absolute BV.

RESULTS

In 40 patients, refilling fraction (/UF volume) was 30.5% in the first hour. Thereafter, refilling fraction steeply increased and reached maximum values in the third and fourth hour at about 95%. The cumulative refilling fraction was 68.5 ± 9.4% at the end. In 14 patients, refilling data from the feedback-controlled UF profile were compared to dialysis sessions with constant UF rates. In 12 of 14 patients, refilling fraction was significantly ( = 0.013) higher in sessions with UF profile (71.6% vs 64.4%).There was a significant negative correlation ( = -0.606;  = 0.002) between the blood volume to extracellular volume ratio and the refilling fraction. The sum of this ratio and the refilling fraction was 1.01 ± 0.06.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite significant differences, a feedback-controlled UF profile has no advantage over the previous refilling studies with regard to the refilling fraction because vascular refilling seems to depend mainly on the ratio of BV to ECV. This would explain the different results in studies using BV guided UF feedback programs.

摘要

背景

超滤率和超滤持续时间被认为是影响血管再充盈的最重要因素。本研究旨在探讨超滤模式是否能改善血管再充盈。

方法

采用反馈控制超滤率的机器进行透析。通过透析液脉冲法测量绝对血容量(BV)。血管再充盈量()计算为超滤量减去绝对 BV 的变化量。

结果

在 40 例患者中,第 1 小时的再充盈分数(/超滤量)为 30.5%。此后,再充盈分数急剧增加,在第 3 小时和第 4 小时达到约 95%的最大值。结束时累积再充盈分数为 68.5±9.4%。在 14 例患者中,将反馈控制超滤模式的再充盈数据与恒定超滤率的透析治疗进行了比较。在 14 例患者中的 12 例中,超滤模式(71.6%比 64.4%)下的再充盈分数明显更高( = 0.013)。BV 与细胞外液体积比与再充盈分数呈显著负相关( = -0.606;  = 0.002)。该比值与再充盈分数之和为 1.01±0.06。

结论

尽管存在显著差异,但与之前使用再充盈研究的超滤率相比,反馈控制超滤模式在再充盈分数方面没有优势,因为血管再充盈似乎主要取决于 BV 与 ECV 的比值。这可以解释使用基于 BV 的 UF 反馈程序的研究中得出的不同结果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验