• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较颈动脉内膜切除术的手术结果:评估由顾问医生主刀与实习医生主刀的病例对患者护理及手术培训的影响。

Comparing the Surgical Outcomes of Carotid Endarterectomy: Assessing the Impact of Consultant versus Trainee Cases on Patient Care and Surgical Training.

作者信息

Nunes Celso, Antunes Luís, Lopes Catarina, O'neill Pedrosa João, Silva Eduardo, Fonseca Manuel

机构信息

Trainee in Vascular Surgery Department, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra City, Portugal.

Vascular Surgeon, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra City, Portugal; Faculty of Medicine in University of Coimbra, Coimbra City, Portugal.

出版信息

Ann Vasc Surg. 2025 Jan;110(Pt B):342-346. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2024.07.098. Epub 2024 Aug 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.avsg.2024.07.098
PMID:39098722
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study assesses the impact of having a surgical trainee performing a carotid endarterectomy (CEA) procedure on the postoperative rates of stroke and death.

METHODS

In this observational retrospective study, consecutive patients, who underwent CEA between May 01, 2016, and July 31, 2022, were entered into a retrospectively collected database. Patients were stratified into 2 categories - consultant-led cases and trainees-led cases. Primary outcomes were 30-day stroke rate, and 30-day morbimortality. A sub analysis was performed after grouping the patients in whether there was a neurological event in the previous 6 months - symptomatic or asymptomatic.

RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS: Trainees-led cases had significantly longer clamping times and higher rates of stroke in asymptomatic patients compared with consultant-led cases. Patient's safety should be our top priority. Any practice leading to a significantly increased rate of postoperative stroke must be discontinued. Training protocols and adequate supervision must ensure that trainees possess the necessary skills and knowledge to safely and effectively perform CEA procedures, thereby prioritizing patient safety.

摘要

背景

本研究评估由外科住院医师进行颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)对术后中风和死亡率的影响。

方法

在这项观察性回顾性研究中,将2016年5月1日至2022年7月31日期间连续接受CEA手术的患者纳入一个回顾性收集的数据库。患者被分为两类——由顾问医生主导的病例和由住院医师主导的病例。主要结局指标为30天中风率和30天病残死亡率。在根据患者在过去6个月内是否发生过神经系统事件(有症状或无症状)进行分组后进行了亚组分析。

结果/结论:与顾问医生主导的病例相比,住院医师主导的病例中无症状患者的夹闭时间明显更长,中风发生率更高。患者安全应是我们的首要任务。任何导致术后中风发生率显著增加的做法都必须停止。培训方案和充分的监督必须确保住院医师具备安全有效地进行CEA手术所需的技能和知识,从而将患者安全放在首位。

相似文献

1
Comparing the Surgical Outcomes of Carotid Endarterectomy: Assessing the Impact of Consultant versus Trainee Cases on Patient Care and Surgical Training.比较颈动脉内膜切除术的手术结果:评估由顾问医生主刀与实习医生主刀的病例对患者护理及手术培训的影响。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2025 Jan;110(Pt B):342-346. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2024.07.098. Epub 2024 Aug 3.
2
The Value of Carotid Endarterectomy as a Learning Tool for Trainees.颈动脉内膜切除术作为学员学习工具的价值
Ann Vasc Surg. 2018 Feb;47:195-199. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2017.08.024. Epub 2017 Sep 7.
3
Defining the threshold surgeon volume associated with improved patient outcomes for carotid endarterectomy.确定颈动脉内膜切除术患者结局改善相关的外科医生手术量阈值。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Jul;72(1):209-218.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.10.057. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
4
Contemporary outcomes after carotid endarterectomy in high-risk anatomic and physiologic patients.高危解剖和生理患者颈动脉内膜切除术的当代结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Jan;71(1):104-110. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.05.041. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
5
Predictors of 30-day postoperative stroke or death after carotid endarterectomy using the 2012 carotid endarterectomy-targeted American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database.2012 年颈动脉内膜切除术靶向美国外科医师学院国家外科质量改进计划数据库评估颈动脉内膜切除术后 30 天卒中和死亡的预测因素。
J Vasc Surg. 2015 Jan;61(1):103-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.05.100. Epub 2014 Jul 24.
6
Preoperative Dependent Functional Status Is Associated With Poor Outcomes After Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Stenting in Both Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Patients.术前依赖性功能状态与症状性和无症状性患者颈动脉内膜切除术和颈动脉支架置入术后的不良结局相关。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2021 Oct;76:114-127. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2021.04.027. Epub 2021 May 15.
7
Locoregional Versus General Anesthesia in Prolonged Carotid Endarterectomy: A Propensity Score-Matched Study from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database from 2011 to 2022.长期颈动脉内膜切除术的局部区域麻醉与全身麻醉:一项基于美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划数据库2011年至2022年数据的倾向评分匹配研究
Ann Vasc Surg. 2025 Jan;110(Pt A):353-364. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2024.09.053. Epub 2024 Oct 15.
8
Differential outcomes of carotid stenting and endarterectomy performed exclusively by vascular surgeons in the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST).颈动脉内膜切除术与血管外科医生实施的颈动脉支架置入术的疗效差异:颈动脉血运重建内膜切除术与支架置入术试验(CREST)。
J Vasc Surg. 2013 Feb;57(2):303-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.09.014. Epub 2012 Dec 20.
9
Long-term stroke risk with carotid endarterectomy in patients with severe carotid stenosis.严重颈动脉狭窄患者颈动脉内膜切除术的长期卒中风险。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Mar;73(3):983-991. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.06.124. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
10
Higher stroke risk after carotid endarterectomy and transcarotid artery revascularization is associated with relative surgeon volume ratio.颈动脉内膜切除术和经颈动脉血管重建术后更高的中风风险与相对外科医生手术量比值相关。
J Vasc Surg. 2024 Oct;80(4):1097-1103. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.05.035. Epub 2024 Jun 19.