Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco-East Bay, Oakland, Calif.
Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, Calif.
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Mar;73(3):983-991. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.06.124. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
Informed debate regarding the optimal use of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for stroke risk reduction requires contemporary assessment of both long-term risk and periprocedural risk. In this study, we report long-term stroke and death risk after CEA in a large integrated health care system.
All patients with documented severe (70%-99%) stenosis from 2008 to 2012 who underwent CEA were identified and stratified by asymptomatic or symptomatic indication. Those with prior ipsilateral interventions were excluded. Patients were followed up through 2017 for the primary outcomes of any stroke/death within 30 days of intervention and long-term ipsilateral ischemic stroke; secondary outcomes were any stroke and overall survival.
Overall, 1949 patients (63.2% male; mean age, 71.3 ± 8.9 years) underwent 2078 primary CEAs, 1196 (58%) for asymptomatic stenosis and 882 (42%) for symptomatic stenosis. Mean follow-up was 5.5 ± 2.7 years. Median time to surgery was 72.0 (interquartile range, 38.5-198.0) days for asymptomatic patients and 21.0 (interquartile range, 5.0-55.0) days for symptomatic patients (P < .001). Most of the patients' demographics and characteristics were similar in both groups. Controlled blood pressure rates were similar at the time of CEA. Baseline statin use was seen in 60.5% of the asymptomatic group compared with 39.9% in the symptomatic group (P < .001), and statin adherence by 80% medication possession ratio was 19.3% asymptomatic vs 12.4% symptomatic (P < .001). The crude overall 30-day any stroke/death rates were 0.9% and 1.5% for the asymptomatic group and the symptomatic group, respectively. The 5-year risk of ipsilateral stroke and a combined end point of any stroke/death by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were 2.5% and 28.7% for the asymptomatic group and 4.0% and 31.4% for the symptomatic group, respectively. Unadjusted cumulative all-cause survival was 74.2% for the asymptomatic group and 71.8% for the symptomatic group at 5 years.
In a contemporary review of CEA, outcomes for either operative indication show low adverse events perioperatively and low long-term stroke risk up to 5 years. These results are well within consensus guidelines and published trial outcomes and should help inform the discussion around optimal CEA use for severe carotid stenosis.
为了对颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)降低卒中风险的最佳应用进行知情辩论,需要对长期风险和围手术期风险进行当代评估。在这项研究中,我们报告了在一个大型综合医疗保健系统中进行 CEA 后的长期卒中风险和死亡风险。
从 2008 年至 2012 年,对所有有记录的严重(70%-99%)狭窄的患者进行了识别,并根据无症状或有症状的指征进行分层。排除了同侧有先前干预的患者。通过 2017 年对患者进行了主要结局(任何卒中/术后 30 天内的死亡)和同侧缺血性卒中的长期随访;次要结局为任何卒中和总生存率。
总体而言,1949 例患者(63.2%为男性;平均年龄为 71.3±8.9 岁)接受了 2078 例原发性 CEA,1196 例(58%)为无症状狭窄,882 例(42%)为有症状狭窄。平均随访时间为 5.5±2.7 年。无症状患者的手术中位时间为 72.0(四分位间距,38.5-198.0)天,有症状患者为 21.0(四分位间距,5.0-55.0)天(P<0.001)。两组患者的大多数人口统计学和特征相似。CEA 时的血压控制率相似。基线他汀类药物使用率在无症状组为 60.5%,在有症状组为 39.9%(P<0.001),80%药物维持率的他汀类药物使用率在无症状组为 19.3%,在有症状组为 12.4%(P<0.001)。无统计学意义的整体 30 天任何卒中/死亡的粗发生率分别为 0.9%和 1.5%,分别为无症状组和有症状组。Kaplan-Meier 生存分析的同侧卒中和任何卒中/死亡联合终点的 5 年风险分别为无症状组 2.5%和 28.7%,有症状组 4.0%和 31.4%。无症状组和有症状组的无调整累计全因生存率分别为 74.2%和 71.8%,5 年时。
在对 CEA 的当代回顾中,无论是手术指征,围手术期不良事件的结果都很低,长期卒中风险在 5 年内也很低。这些结果均在共识指南和已发表试验结果的范围内,应该有助于围绕严重颈动脉狭窄的最佳 CEA 应用进行讨论。