• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国家药品监督管理局在低收入国家的能力评估。

Capacity Assessment of the National Medicines Regulatory Authority in a Low -Income Country.

机构信息

Department of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Medicine and Allied Health Sciences, University of Sierra Leone, Freetown, Sierra Leone.

Department of Pharmacovigilance and Clinical Trials, Pharmacy Board of Sierra Leone, Freetown, Sierra Leone.

出版信息

Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2024 Nov;58(6):1053-1060. doi: 10.1007/s43441-024-00683-w. Epub 2024 Aug 4.

DOI:10.1007/s43441-024-00683-w
PMID:39098976
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Access to medical products of the required efficacy, quality and safety is essential for everyone's health and wellbeing. To achieve this milestone, every country needs a robust and strong performing National Regulatory Authority (NRA) that is independent and outcome oriented. With the help of the World Health Organization (WHO), the global benchmarking tool is the gold standard used to assess the regulatory capacity of NRAs.

OBJECTIVES

This study assessed the capacity of the National Medicines Regulatory Authority in Sierra Leone to perform its regulatory functions.

METHODS

This descriptive cross-sectional study used both qualitative and quantitative approaches. A self-administered questionnaire was used for the quantitative approach, and the qualitative aspect consisted of a desk review looking at key regulatory documents such as laws, regulations, policies, guidelines, standard operating procedures and reports. The data collection tool used was the WHO global benchmarking tool (GBT) for "Evaluation of National Regulatory System of Medical Product Version VI.

RESULTS

The majority of the participants had a postgraduate degree (60%), and 72% had over 10 years of experience working at the NRA. Out of 251 sub-indicators assessed, 85 (34%) sub-indicators were fully implemented. Of the eight (8) functions assessed, sub-indicators related to clinical trial oversight and vigilance were the most implemented, with 67% and 62%, respectively. Of the 9 indicators assessed, 79% of the sub-indicators that are related to quality and risk management were implemented. The results of this study showed that PBSL operates at maturity level 1. The absence of laws and regulations that give PBSL the mandate to perform its regulatory functions was a major challenge even though other indicators were met. The study reported other challenges toward effective functioning, including but not limited to a lack of sufficient staff, weak enforcement of the sale of medicines and a poorly equipped quality control laboratory.

摘要

背景

每个人的健康和福祉都需要获得具有所需疗效、质量和安全性的医疗产品。为了实现这一里程碑,每个国家都需要一个强大的、表现出色的国家监管机构(NRA),该机构应具有独立性并注重结果。在世界卫生组织(WHO)的帮助下,全球基准工具是评估 NRA 监管能力的黄金标准。

目的

本研究评估了塞拉利昂国家药品监管局履行其监管职能的能力。

方法

本描述性横断面研究采用了定性和定量方法。定量方法使用了自填式问卷,定性方面包括对关键监管文件(如法律、法规、政策、指南、标准操作程序和报告)的桌面审查。使用的数据集收集工具是世界卫生组织全球基准工具(GBT),用于“评估医疗产品国家监管系统第六版”。

结果

大多数参与者具有研究生学历(60%),并且 72%的人在 NRA 工作了 10 年以上。在所评估的 251 个子指标中,有 85 个子指标(34%)得到了全面实施。在所评估的八个(8)职能中,临床试验监督和警戒相关的子指标实施程度最高,分别为 67%和 62%。在所评估的 9 个指标中,与质量和风险管理相关的 79%的子指标得到了实施。这项研究的结果表明,PBSL 的运作成熟度为 1 级。尽管满足了其他指标,但缺乏赋予 PBSL 履行监管职能的法律和法规仍然是一个主要挑战。该研究报告了其他有效运作的挑战,包括但不限于人员不足、对药品销售的执法不力以及质量控制实验室设备简陋。

相似文献

1
Capacity Assessment of the National Medicines Regulatory Authority in a Low -Income Country.国家药品监督管理局在低收入国家的能力评估。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2024 Nov;58(6):1053-1060. doi: 10.1007/s43441-024-00683-w. Epub 2024 Aug 4.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Pharmacovigilance processes in low- and middle-income countries: moving from data collection to data analysis and interpretation.低收入和中等收入国家的药物警戒流程:从数据收集转向数据分析与解读
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2025 Jun 11;16:20420986241300006. doi: 10.1177/20420986241300006. eCollection 2025.
4
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
5
Comparison of the review models and regulatory timelines of seven countries participating in the ECOWAS-MRH initiative: identifying opportunities for improvement.参与西非国家经济共同体-疟疾研究与培训联盟倡议的七个国家的审评模式和监管时间表比较:确定改进机会
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jul 14;12:1587761. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1587761. eCollection 2025.
6
Smoking cessation medicines and e-cigarettes: a systematic review, network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis.戒烟药物和电子烟:系统评价、网络荟萃分析和成本效益分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Oct;25(59):1-224. doi: 10.3310/hta25590.
7
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
8
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
9
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
10
Paying for performance to improve the delivery of health interventions in low- and middle-income countries .通过绩效付费来改善低收入和中等收入国家的卫生干预措施提供情况 。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Feb 15(2):CD007899. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007899.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Regulatory performance of the East African Community joint assessment procedure: The way forward for regulatory systems strengthening.东非共同体联合评估程序的监管绩效:加强监管系统的未来之路。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2023 May;140:105383. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2023.105383. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
2
Leveraging WHO's Global Benchmarking Tool to strengthen capacity in clinical trials oversight for public health emergencies: the GHPP VaccTrain model.利用世卫组织全球基准工具加强公共卫生突发事件临床试验监督能力:GHPP VaccTrain 模式。
Global Health. 2022 Jun 20;18(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12992-022-00854-0.
3
Inconsistent Country-Wide Reporting of Adverse Drug Reactions to Antimicrobials in Sierra Leone (2017-2021): A Wake-Up Call to Improve Reporting.
塞拉利昂 2017-2021 年抗微生物药物不良反应国家报告不一致:提高报告质量的警钟。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 10;19(6):3264. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063264.
4
Advancing African Medicines Agency through Global Health Diplomacy for an Equitable Pan-African Universal Health Coverage: A Scoping Review.通过全球卫生外交推进非洲药品管理局,实现公平的泛非全民健康覆盖:范围综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 9;18(22):11758. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182211758.
5
Comparative Assessment of the Pharmacovigilance Systems within the Neglected Tropical Diseases Programs in East Africa-Ethiopia, Kenya, Rwanda, and Tanzania.东非(埃塞俄比亚、肯尼亚、卢旺达和坦桑尼亚)被忽视热带病规划中的药物警戒系统比较评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 17;18(4):1941. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041941.
6
A rapid assessment of the National Regulatory Systems for medical products in the Southern African Development Community.对南部非洲发展共同体医疗产品国家监管系统的快速评估。
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2020 Oct 5;13:64. doi: 10.1186/s40545-020-00255-x. eCollection 2020.
7
The WHO Global Benchmarking Tool: a game changer for strengthening national regulatory capacity.世卫组织全球基准工具:加强国家监管能力的游戏规则改变者。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Aug;5(8). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003181.
8
Prevalence and Estimated Economic Burden of Substandard and Falsified Medicines in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.中低收入国家不合格和假冒药品的流行情况及经济负担估计:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Aug 3;1(4):e181662. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.1662.
9
Field detection devices for screening the quality of medicines: a systematic review.用于筛查药品质量的现场检测设备:一项系统评价
BMJ Glob Health. 2018 Aug 29;3(4):e000725. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000725. eCollection 2018.
10
Medicines Regulation in Africa: Current State and Opportunities.非洲的药品监管:现状与机遇
Pharmaceut Med. 2017;31(6):383-397. doi: 10.1007/s40290-017-0210-x. Epub 2017 Nov 3.