• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

东非共同体联合评估程序的监管绩效:加强监管系统的未来之路。

Regulatory performance of the East African Community joint assessment procedure: The way forward for regulatory systems strengthening.

机构信息

East African Community Secretariat, Arusha, Tanzania.

School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, United Kingdom; African Union Development Agency- New Partnership for Africa's Development (AUDA-NEPAD), Johannesburg, South Africa.

出版信息

Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2023 May;140:105383. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2023.105383. Epub 2023 Mar 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.yrtph.2023.105383
PMID:36933643
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Seven national medicines regulatory authorities in the East African Community (EAC) have embraced regulatory reliance, harmonization and work sharing through the EAC Medicines Regulatory Harmonization programme. Measuring the performance of regulatory systems provides key baseline information to build on regulatory system-strengthening strategies. Therefore, the aim of the study was to evaluate the regulatory performance of the EAC joint scientific assessment of applications approved between 2018 and 2021.

METHODS

Utilising a data metrics tool, information was collected reflecting timelines for various milestones including submission to screening, scientific assessment and communication of regional recommendations for biologicals and pharmaceuticals that received a positive regional recommendation for product registration from 2018 to 2021.

RESULTS

Several challenges as well as possible solutions were identified, including median overall approval times exceeding the EAC 465-day target and median times to issue marketing authorisation following EAC joint assessment recommendation that far exceeded the 116-day target. Recommendations included establishment of an integrated information management system and automation of the capture of regulatory timelines through the EAC metric tool.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite initiative progress, work is required to improve the EAC joint regulatory procedure to achieve regulatory systems-strengthening and ensure patients' timely access to safe, efficacious and quality medicines.

摘要

背景

东非共同体(EAC)的七个国家药品监管机构通过 EAC 药品监管协调方案,采用监管依赖、协调和工作分担的方式。衡量监管系统的绩效为加强监管系统战略提供了关键的基准信息。因此,本研究旨在评估 2018 年至 2021 年期间批准的联合科学评估申请的 EAC 监管绩效。

方法

利用数据指标工具,收集反映各种里程碑时间线的信息,包括自提交筛选、科学评估到就生物制品和药品发布区域建议的各个阶段,这些药品在 2018 年至 2021 年期间收到了来自区域的产品注册积极建议。

结果

确定了几个挑战以及可能的解决方案,包括总体批准时间中位数超过 EAC 465 天的目标,以及在 EAC 联合评估建议后发布营销授权的时间中位数远远超过 116 天的目标。建议包括建立一个综合信息管理系统,并通过 EAC 指标工具实现监管时间线的自动化捕获。

结论

尽管取得了初步进展,但仍需要努力改进 EAC 联合监管程序,以加强监管系统,并确保患者能够及时获得安全、有效和高质量的药物。

相似文献

1
Regulatory performance of the East African Community joint assessment procedure: The way forward for regulatory systems strengthening.东非共同体联合评估程序的监管绩效:加强监管系统的未来之路。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2023 May;140:105383. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2023.105383. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
2
Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Efficiency of the East African Community Joint Assessment Procedure by Member Countries: The Way Forward.东非共同体成员国对联合评估程序有效性和效率的评估:前进之路
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Jul 5;13:891506. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.891506. eCollection 2022.
3
Evaluation of the review models and approval timelines of authorities participating in the East African Medicine Regulatory Harmonisation initiative: alignment and strategies for moving forward.参与东非药品监管协调倡议的各当局审评模式及审批时限评估:协调一致及未来推进策略
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Sep 17;11:1438041. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1438041. eCollection 2024.
4
Industrial perceptions of medicines regulatory harmonization in the East African Community.东非共同体中对药品监管协调的产业看法。
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 19;14(6):e0218617. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218617. eCollection 2019.
5
What makes joint assessment procedures attractive to the innovative industry: successes, challenges, and proposed improvements.联合评估程序对创新产业具有吸引力的因素:成功之处、挑战及改进建议。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Sep 4;10:1207954. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1207954. eCollection 2023.
6
Evaluation of the effectiveness and efficiency of the East African community joint assessment procedure by pharmaceutical companies: Opportunities for improvement.制药公司对东非共同体联合评估程序的有效性和效率评估:改进机会
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Nov 3;13:1031289. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.1031289. eCollection 2022.
7
Evaluation of good review practices in member authorities of the East African Medicines Regulatory Harmonisation initiative: strategies for alignment with African medicines agency.评估东非药品监管协调倡议成员国当局的良好审评实践:与非洲药品管理局保持一致的策略
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Aug 29;11:1437970. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1437970. eCollection 2024.
8
Harmonization of medical products regulation: a key factor for improving regulatory capacity in the East African Community.医疗产品监管协调:提高东非共同体监管能力的关键因素。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jan 21;21(1):187. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10169-1.
9
Comparison of Three Regional Medicines Regulatory Harmonisation Initiatives in Africa: Opportunities for Improvement and Alignment.比较非洲的三种区域药品监管协调倡议:改进和统一的机会。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2024;13:8070. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2024.8070. Epub 2024 May 5.
10
Regional regulatory harmonisation initiatives: Their potential contribution to the newly established African Medicines Agency.区域监管协调倡议:对新成立的非洲药品管理局的潜在贡献。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2023 Dec;145:105497. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2023.105497. Epub 2023 Sep 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Bridging the gap: enhancing blood regulatory functions in African contexts through comparative analysis.缩小差距:通过比较分析增强非洲背景下的血液调节功能。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 May 1;12:1519719. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1519719. eCollection 2025.
2
Good manufacturing practice inspections conducted by Tanzania medicines and medical devices authority: a comparative study of two fiscal years from 2018 to 2020.坦桑尼亚药品和医疗器械管理局进行的药品生产质量管理规范检查:2018年至2020年两个财政年度的比较研究
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2024 Sep 16;17(1):2399722. doi: 10.1080/20523211.2024.2399722. eCollection 2024.
3
Evaluation of good review practices in member authorities of the East African Medicines Regulatory Harmonisation initiative: strategies for alignment with African medicines agency.
评估东非药品监管协调倡议成员国当局的良好审评实践:与非洲药品管理局保持一致的策略
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Aug 29;11:1437970. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1437970. eCollection 2024.
4
Capacity Assessment of the National Medicines Regulatory Authority in a Low -Income Country.国家药品监督管理局在低收入国家的能力评估。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2024 Nov;58(6):1053-1060. doi: 10.1007/s43441-024-00683-w. Epub 2024 Aug 4.