Department of Family Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Faculty of Nursing, Memorial University, St. John's, NL, Canada.
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2024;13:8166. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.8166. Epub 2024 Jun 19.
Medical professionals experienced high rates of burnout and moral distress during the COVID-19 pandemic. In Canada, burnout has been linked to a growing number of family physicians (FPs) leaving the workforce, increasing the number of patients without access to a regular doctor. This study explores the different factors that impacted FPs' experience with burnout and moral distress during the pandemic, with the goal of identifying system-based interventions aimed at supporting FP well-being and improving retention.
We conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with FPs across four health regions in Canada. Participants were asked about the roles they assumed during different stages of the pandemic, and they were also encouraged to describe their well-being, including relevant supports and barriers. We used thematic analysis to examine themes relating to FP mental health and well-being.
We interviewed 68 FPs across the four health regions. We identified two overarching themes related to moral distress and burnout: (1) inability to provide appropriate care, and (2) system-related stressors and buffers of burnout. FPs expressed concern about the quality of care their patients were able to receive during the pandemic, citing instances where pandemic restrictions limited their ability to access critical preventative and diagnostic services. Participants also described four factors that alleviated or exacerbated feelings of burnout, including: (1) workload, (2) payment model, (3) locum coverage, and (4) team and peer support.
The COVID-19 pandemic limited FPs' ability to provide quality care to patients, and contributed to increased moral distress and burnout. These findings highlight the importance of implementing system-wide interventions to improve FP well-being during public health emergencies. These could include the expansion of interprofessional team-based models of care, alternate remuneration models for primary care (ie, non-fee-for-service), organized locum programs, and the availability of short-term insurance programs to cover fixed practice operating costs.
在 COVID-19 大流行期间,医疗专业人员经历了高比率的倦怠和道德困境。在加拿大,倦怠与越来越多的家庭医生(FPs)离开劳动力队伍有关,导致越来越多的患者无法获得常规医生的治疗。这项研究探讨了在大流行期间影响 FPs 倦怠和道德困境体验的不同因素,旨在确定以系统为基础的干预措施,以支持 FP 的健康并提高保留率。
我们在加拿大的四个卫生区域对 FPs 进行了半结构化的定性访谈。要求参与者描述他们在大流行不同阶段所扮演的角色,并鼓励他们描述自己的幸福感,包括相关的支持和障碍。我们使用主题分析来研究与 FP 心理健康和幸福感相关的主题。
我们在四个卫生区域采访了 68 名 FPs。我们确定了与道德困境和倦怠相关的两个总体主题:(1)无法提供适当的护理;(2)与系统相关的压力源和倦怠的缓冲因素。FPs 对他们的患者在大流行期间能够获得的护理质量表示担忧,他们引用了一些大流行限制限制他们获得关键预防和诊断服务的例子。参与者还描述了减轻或加剧倦怠感的四个因素,包括:(1)工作量;(2)支付模式;(3)替代人员覆盖;(4)团队和同行支持。
COVID-19 大流行限制了 FPs 为患者提供高质量护理的能力,并导致道德困境和倦怠感加剧。这些发现强调了在公共卫生紧急情况下实施全系统干预措施以改善 FP 健康的重要性。这些措施可能包括扩大基于多专业团队的护理模式、为初级保健制定替代薪酬模式(例如,非按服务收费)、组织替代人员计划以及提供短期保险计划以支付固定实践运营成本。