Winberg Debra R, Baker Matthew C, Hu Xiaochu, Horvath Keith A
Health Care Affairs, Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, DC 20001, United States.
Department of Health Policy and Management, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA 70112, United States.
Health Aff Sch. 2024 Jul 16;2(8):qxae087. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxae087. eCollection 2024 Aug.
Value-based care (VBC) payment models are becoming increasingly prevalent as alternatives to the traditional fee-for-service paradigm. This research quantifies the relationship between physician characteristics and participation in VBC payment models using the Association of American Medical Colleges' 2022 National Sample Survey of Physicians. We specified logistic regressions using physician-level variables to assess associations with current and new participation in Accountable Care Organizations, Primary Care First model, capitation, and bundled payments. Our results indicate that most respondents engaged in at least 1 VBC. Participation varied based on several characteristics, and physician specialty was highly predictive of overall participation. Compared with primary care physicians (PCPs), hospital-based physicians (odds ratio [OR] = 0.6, < .001), medical specialists (OR = 0.5, < .001), psychiatrists (OR = 0.4, < .001), and surgeons (OR = 0.5, < .001) were less likely to participate in VBC models. Medical specialists and surgeons were less likely to participate in commercial capitation than PCPs, while medical specialists and obstetricians/gynecologists were more likely to participate in certain bundles than PCPs. We suggest several policies to close the cross-specialty participation gap by including specialists and appealing to providers and patients.
基于价值的医疗(VBC)支付模式正日益普遍,成为传统按服务收费模式的替代方案。本研究利用美国医学院协会2022年全国医师抽样调查,量化医师特征与参与VBC支付模式之间的关系。我们使用医师层面的变量指定逻辑回归,以评估与当前参与和新参与 accountable care organizations、初级保健优先模式、按人头付费和捆绑支付之间的关联。我们的结果表明,大多数受访者至少参与了1种VBC模式。参与情况因多种特征而异,医师专业对总体参与情况具有高度预测性。与初级保健医师(PCP)相比,医院医师(优势比[OR]=0.6,P<.001)、医学专科医师(OR=0.5,P<.001)、精神科医师(OR=0.4,P<.001)和外科医师(OR=0.5,P<.001)参与VBC模式的可能性较小。医学专科医师和外科医师参与商业按人头付费的可能性低于PCP,而医学专科医师和妇产科医师参与某些捆绑支付的可能性高于PCP。我们提出了几项政策,通过纳入专科医师并吸引医疗服务提供者和患者来缩小跨专业参与差距。