Suppr超能文献

温带潮间带海岸主要软体食肉类捕食者的种群特征和捕食率。

Population characteristics and predation rates of the dominant soft-bodied and durophagous predators on temperate intertidal shores.

作者信息

Peck Lloyd S, Mance Hannah E, Ellis Miles B, Matok Daniel, Grange Laura J

机构信息

British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0ET, UK.

School of Ocean Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor LL57 2DG, UK.

出版信息

R Soc Open Sci. 2024 Jun 19;11(6):240308. doi: 10.1098/rsos.240308. eCollection 2024 Jun.

Abstract

Substantial research exists on predation and its ecology. Most research has focused on durophagous fishes, brachyuran crabs, and lobsters. Data are lacking, however, on soft-bodied predators like anemones, and their contribution to overall levels of predation remains largely unevaluated. Here, we compared predation rates of the durophagous predator, the crab and the soft-bodied predator, the anemone on 15 intertidal shores around Anglesey, north Wales, UK. We employed a novel approach to assess predation based on measuring faecal output from recently collected individuals and converting it to food consumed using absorption efficiencies (AEs) measured using potential prey species inhabiting the same shores. Anemone mean abundance was 8.21 (± 0.27, s.e.) individuals.m, whereas for it was 0.23 (± 0.02, s.e.) individuals.m. AEs when fed mussel tissue, a polychaete worm, or a shrimp were 92.8-94.0% in and 40.5-95.8% in . This difference in values reflected the different feeding modes of the two predators. Unexpectedly, consumed 3.5-7 times more prey than . The consumption of larger amounts of prey by an anemone than the dominant durophagous predator has important consequences for calculating energy flows in food webs, understanding predation controls in assemblages, and potentially for wider predation trends.

摘要

关于捕食及其生态学已有大量研究。大多数研究集中在食硬壳动物的鱼类、短尾蟹和龙虾上。然而,对于像海葵这样的软体捕食者的数据却很缺乏,它们对总体捕食水平的贡献在很大程度上仍未得到评估。在这里,我们比较了食硬壳动物捕食者螃蟹和软体捕食者海葵在英国北威尔士安格尔西岛周围15个潮间带海岸的捕食率。我们采用了一种新颖的方法来评估捕食,即测量最近采集个体的粪便产量,并使用在同一海岸栖息的潜在猎物物种测得的吸收效率(AE)将其转化为消耗的食物量。海葵的平均丰度为8.21(±0.27,标准误)个/平方米,而螃蟹为0.23(±0.02,标准误)个/平方米。当喂食贻贝组织、多毛类蠕虫或虾时,海葵的吸收效率为92.8 - 94.0%,螃蟹为40.5 - 95.8%。这些数值的差异反映了两种捕食者不同的摄食方式。出乎意料的是,海葵消耗的猎物比螃蟹多3.5至7倍。海葵比占主导地位的食硬壳动物捕食者消耗更多猎物这一情况,对于计算食物网中的能量流动、理解群落中的捕食控制以及潜在的更广泛的捕食趋势具有重要意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ab1/11296203/758030bb93fb/rsos.240308.f001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验