Tan Yafei, An Xiaoran, Cao Menglu, Van den Bergh Omer
School of Psychology, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, China.
Key Laboratory of Adolescent Cyberpsychology and Behavior (CCNU), Ministry of Education, Wuhan, China.
Front Psychol. 2024 Jul 19;15:1392351. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1392351. eCollection 2024.
The Somatosensory Amplification Scale (SSAS) was designed to measure individual's tendency to experience visceral and somatic sensations as unusually intense, disturbing and alarming. In this study, we aimed to investigate the reliability and validity of the SSAS in the Chinese general population, as well as the mediating effect of somatosensory amplification in the relationship between alexithymia and somatization. A total of 386 healthy adults were enrolled in this study. Participants completed the Chinese versions of the Somatosensory Amplification Scale (SSAS-C), the somatization subscale of the Symptom Check List 90 (SCL-90 som), the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20), and the Short form Health Anxiety Inventory (SHAI). One hundred and thirty-three participants were randomly selected to complete the SSAS-C again two weeks after the initial assessment. The reliability and validity of the SSAS-C were analyzed. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the one-factor model achieved adequate model fits; one item was deleted due to low factor loading. The revised SSAS-C showed good internal consistency and test-retest reliability. The SSAS-C scores correlated positively with the scores of SCL-90 som, TAS-20 and the SHAI, showing good convergent validity. In addition, somatosensory amplification mediated the association between alexithymia and somatization. The Chinese version of SSAS has acceptable reliability and validity for the general population. In addition, alexithymia may increase somatization through higher somatosensory amplification.
体感放大量表(SSAS)旨在测量个体将内脏和躯体感觉体验为异常强烈、令人不安和惊恐的倾向。在本研究中,我们旨在调查SSAS在中国普通人群中的信效度,以及体感放大在述情障碍与躯体化关系中的中介作用。本研究共纳入386名健康成年人。参与者完成了中文版的体感放大量表(SSAS-C)、症状自评量表90(SCL-90)的躯体化分量表、多伦多述情障碍量表(TAS-20)和简短健康焦虑量表(SHAI)。133名参与者在首次评估两周后被随机选取再次完成SSAS-C。分析了SSAS-C的信效度。验证性因素分析表明单因素模型具有良好的模型拟合度;由于因子载荷较低,删除了一个项目。修订后的SSAS-C显示出良好的内部一致性和重测信度。SSAS-C得分与SCL-90躯体化分量表、TAS-20和SHAI得分呈正相关,显示出良好的收敛效度。此外,体感放大在述情障碍与躯体化的关联中起中介作用。中文版SSAS在普通人群中具有可接受的信效度。此外,述情障碍可能通过更高的体感放大增加躯体化。