Taycan Okan, Özdemir Armağan, Erdoğan Taycan Serap
Clinic of Psychiatry, Haydarpaşa Numune Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.
Clinic of Psychiatry, Bakırköy Prof. Dr. Mazhar Osman Research and Training Hospital for Psychiatry, Neurology and Neurosurgery, İstanbul, Turkey.
Noro Psikiyatr Ars. 2017 Jun;54(2):99-104. doi: 10.5152/npa.2016.12385. Epub 2017 Jan 19.
This study aimed to establish the association between alexithymia and various factors, mainly somatization, and to determine the predictors of alexithymia in depressed patients.
A total of 90 patients with major depressive disorder who met The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) diagnostic criteria were administered the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS), Beck Depression Inventory, Symptom Checklist-90 (SCL-90), Somatosensory Amplification Scale, and Symptom Interpretation Questionnaire. The patients were classified into two groups as alexithymic and non-alexithymic with respect to the TAS cut-off points (≥59=alexithymic). Predictors of alexithymia were tested by multiple linear regression analysis.
Of all patients, 36 (40%) were in the alexithymic group. The percentage of women, depression severity, level of general psychopathology and distress, and somatic symptom reporting (SCL-90), as well as the tendency to somatosensory amplification and three forms of somatic symptom attributions, were significantly higher in alexithymic patients than in non-alexithymic patients. Furthermore, age, depression severity, somatic symptom reporting, and the tendency to attribute physical symptoms to somatic causes were predictors of alexithymia.
The results indicated an intimate association between alexithymia and somatization in depressed patients. Therefore, when evaluating depressed patients with alexithymia, their tendency for somatization should be considered, and alexithymic individuals should be assessed with particular attention, considering that somatization can mask the underlying depressive condition.
本研究旨在确定述情障碍与各种因素(主要是躯体化)之间的关联,并确定抑郁症患者述情障碍的预测因素。
对90名符合《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)诊断标准的重度抑郁症患者进行了多伦多述情障碍量表(TAS)、贝克抑郁量表、症状自评量表90(SCL-90)、躯体感觉放大量表和症状解释问卷的评估。根据TAS的临界值(≥59为述情障碍)将患者分为述情障碍组和非述情障碍组。通过多元线性回归分析测试述情障碍的预测因素。
所有患者中,36名(40%)属于述情障碍组。述情障碍患者中女性的比例、抑郁严重程度、一般精神病理学和痛苦程度、躯体症状报告(SCL-90),以及躯体感觉放大倾向和三种躯体症状归因形式均显著高于非述情障碍患者。此外,年龄、抑郁严重程度、躯体症状报告以及将身体症状归因于躯体原因的倾向是述情障碍的预测因素。
结果表明抑郁症患者的述情障碍与躯体化之间存在密切关联。因此,在评估伴有述情障碍的抑郁症患者时,应考虑其躯体化倾向,并且鉴于躯体化可能掩盖潜在的抑郁状况,应对述情障碍个体进行特别评估。