Ludwig Sebastian, Strotmann Lena S, Schrage Benedikt N, Koell Benedikt, Coisne Augustin, Scotti Andrea, Rommel Karl-Philipp, Weimann Jessica, Schwarzl Michael, Seiffert Moritz, Reichenspurner Hermann, Blankenberg Stefan, Schäfer Andreas, Burkhoff Daniel, Schofer Niklas, Granada Juan, Conradi Lenard, Kalbacher Daniel
Department of Cardiology, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Hamburg, Germany.
Struct Heart. 2024 Jun 8;8(4):100322. doi: 10.1016/j.shj.2024.100322. eCollection 2024 Jul.
Transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) represents a novel treatment option for patients with mitral regurgitation (MR), but little is known about the hemodynamic impact of MR elimination following TMVR. We sought to investigate the hemodynamic impact of TMVR on left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular (RV) function using noninvasive pressure-volume loops.
All consecutive patients undergoing TMVR with dedicated devices between May 2016 and August 2022 were enrolled. The end-diastolic and end-systolic pressure-volume relationships were estimated from 26 patients using single-beat echocardiographic measurements at baseline and after TMVR at discharge. RV function was assessed by RV-pulmonary artery (PA) coupling and RV fractional area change. One-year follow-up was available for 19 patients. The prognostic impact of calculated end-diastolic volume at an end-diastolic pressure of 20 mmHg (VPed20) reduction was assessed by Cox regression.
A total of 26 patients (77.0 years [interquartile range 73.9-80.1], N = 17 [65.4%] male) with successful TMVR were included (secondary MR [N = 21, 80.8%]; median LV ejection fraction was 37.0% [interquartile range 30.7-50.7]). At discharge, a decrease in VPed20 ( < 0.001) indicating leftward shift of end-diastolic pressure-volume relationship, and an increase of the end-systolic elastance slope ( = 0.007) were observed after TMVR. No changes were observed for RV-PA coupling ( = 0.19) and RV fractional area change ( = 0.22). At 1-year follow-up, LV contractility (end-systolic elastance) and RV-PA coupling remained stable. Vped20 reduction at discharge was significantly associated with 1-year all-cause mortality or heart failure hospitalization (hazard ratio 0.16, 95% CI 0.04-0.71, = 0.016).
Noninvasive assessment of pressure-volume loops demonstrated early LV reverse remodeling and improved LV contractility, while RV performance was preserved. These results indicate the potential prognostic impact of complete MR elimination after TMVR.
经导管二尖瓣置换术(TMVR)是二尖瓣反流(MR)患者的一种新型治疗选择,但对于TMVR后消除MR的血流动力学影响知之甚少。我们试图使用无创压力-容积环来研究TMVR对左心室(LV)和右心室(RV)功能的血流动力学影响。
纳入2016年5月至2022年8月期间所有使用专用设备进行TMVR的连续患者。通过单搏超声心动图测量,对26例患者在基线和TMVR出院后进行舒张末期和收缩末期压力-容积关系评估。通过右心室-肺动脉(PA)耦合和右心室面积变化分数评估右心室功能。19例患者有1年的随访数据。通过Cox回归评估在舒张末期压力为20 mmHg时计算的舒张末期容积(VPed20)降低的预后影响。
共纳入26例成功进行TMVR的患者(年龄77.0岁[四分位间距73.9 - 80.1岁],男性17例[65.4%])(继发性MR [21例,80.8%];左心室射血分数中位数为37.0%[四分位间距30.7 - 50.7%])。出院时,观察到TMVR后VPed20降低(<0.001),表明舒张末期压力-容积关系向左移位,收缩末期弹性斜率增加(=0.007)。右心室-肺动脉耦合(=0.19)和右心室面积变化分数(=0.22)无变化。在1年随访时,左心室收缩力(收缩末期弹性)和右心室-肺动脉耦合保持稳定。出院时VPed20降低与1年全因死亡率或心力衰竭住院显著相关(风险比0.16,95%可信区间0.04 - 0.71,=0.016)。
无创压力-容积环评估显示早期左心室逆向重构和左心室收缩力改善,同时右心室功能得以保留。这些结果表明TMVR后完全消除MR具有潜在的预后影响。