Murai Koshiro, Fujihara Kazuya, Harada Yamada Mayuko, Matsubayashi Yasuhiro, Yamada Takaho, Iwanaga Midori, Kitazawa Masaru, Yamamoto Masahiko, Osawa Taeko, Yaguchi Yuta, Kodama Satoru, Sone Hirohito
Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Niigata University, 1-757 Asahimachi, Niigata, 951-8510 Japan.
Diabetol Int. 2024 Apr 2;15(3):456-464. doi: 10.1007/s13340-024-00708-7. eCollection 2024 Jul.
To evaluate and compare the association of incident cardiovascular disease (CVD) with the Health Practice Index (HPI) reflecting only lifestyle habits and Ideal Cardiovascular Health Metrics (ICVHMs) consisting of lifestyle habits and factors targeted for control in the same population according to glucose status.
This retrospective cohort study included 1,28,162 participants aged 18-72 years with no history of CVD followed for ≥ 3 years between 2008 and 2016. Participants were classified according to normal glucose tolerance (86,174), prediabetes (36,096), or diabetes (5892). HPI and ICVHMs scores were classified into three groups (high/medium/low). Multivariate Cox regression hazard analysis examined CVD risk.
During a mean follow-up of 5.2 years, 1057 CVD events occurred. In prediabetes, CVD risk was significantly higher in groups with both medium and low HPI scores and ICVHMs scores compared to high scores for normal glucose tolerance (hazard ratios [HRs] for high/medium/low HPI scores were 0.95 [0.78-1.17], 1.56 [1.29-1.89], and 2.41 [1.74-3.34] and for ICVHMs scores were 0.74 [0.50-1.11], 1.58 [1.26-1.98], and 2.63 [2.10-3.31], respectively). Regarding diabetes, compared with high HPI/ICVHMs scores in the normal glucose tolerance group, a significantly increased CVD risk was observed in the high-score HPI group, but not in the high-score ICVHMs group (HPI high/medium/low HR, 1.63 [1.22-2.18], 2.19 [1.69-2.83], and 2.26 [1.34 -3.83]; ICVHMs high/medium/low HR, 1.14 [0.47-2.81], 2.38 [1.75-3.23], and 3.31 [2.50-4.38], respectively).
In diabetes, ideal lifestyle practices alone were insufficient for primary prevention of CVD but had a greater impact on primary prevention of CVD in prediabetes.
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13340-024-00708-7.
评估并比较新发心血管疾病(CVD)与仅反映生活方式习惯的健康实践指数(HPI)以及由生活方式习惯和根据血糖状态在同一人群中需控制的因素组成的理想心血管健康指标(ICVHMs)之间的关联。
这项回顾性队列研究纳入了128162名年龄在18至72岁之间且无CVD病史的参与者,他们在2008年至2016年期间接受了≥3年的随访。参与者根据正常糖耐量(86174人)、糖尿病前期(36096人)或糖尿病(5892人)进行分类。HPI和ICVHMs得分被分为三组(高/中/低)。多变量Cox回归风险分析检测CVD风险。
在平均5.2年的随访期间,发生了1057例CVD事件。在糖尿病前期,与正常糖耐量高得分组相比,HPI得分和ICVHMs得分中等及低分组的CVD风险显著更高(HPI得分高/中/低的风险比[HRs]分别为0.95[0.78 - 1.17]、1.56[1.29 - 1.89]和2.41[1.74 - 3.34],ICVHMs得分的HRs分别为0.74[0.50 - 1.11]、1.58[1.26 - 1.98]和2.63[2.10 - 3.31])。对于糖尿病,与正常糖耐量组的高HPI/ICVHMs得分相比,高得分HPI组的CVD风险显著增加,但高得分ICVHMs组未增加(HPI高/中/低HR分别为1.63[1.22 - 2.18]、2.19[1.69 - 2.83]和2.26[1.34 - 3.83];ICVHMs高/中/低HR分别为1.14[0.47 - 2.81]、2.38[1.75 - 3.23]和 3.31[2.50 - 4.38])。
在糖尿病中,仅理想的生活方式习惯不足以进行CVD的一级预防,但对糖尿病前期CVD的一级预防有更大影响。
在线版本包含可在10.1007/s13340 - 024 - 00708 - 7获取的补充材料。