Aldawood Sukainah A, Omar Omar, Almohazey Dana, Atmeh Amre R
Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
AlAhsa Health Cluster, Ministry of Health, Alahsa, Saudi Arabia.
Aust Endod J. 2024 Dec;50(3):595-603. doi: 10.1111/aej.12881. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
This study evaluated the reliability of sealer penetration measurement methods used with confocal laser scanning microscopy in correlation with the percentage of residual root filling and examined the effect of residual root-filling material on dentine penetrability after retreatment. Extracted teeth were randomly divided into different groups according to the obturation sealer used (n = 6); BioRoot RCS; MTA Fillapex; Bio-C and AH Plus. Root-filling material was removed before the secondary chemo-mechanical preparation and obturation using fluorescein labelled AH Plus. Multiple micro-computed tomography scans were obtained followed by confocal laser scanning microscopy to measure the penetration of the labelled sealer into the dentinal tubules using four different methods. Measuring sealer penetration into radicular dentine using the penetration percentage method was found to be the most reliable. Dentine penetrability during retreatment did not seem to be affected by the type of residual root-filling material.
本研究评估了共聚焦激光扫描显微镜用于测量封闭剂渗透的方法与残余根充物百分比之间的相关性,并检测了再治疗后残余根充材料对牙本质渗透性的影响。根据所用的封闭剂(n = 6),将拔除的牙齿随机分为不同组;BioRoot RCS、MTA Fillapex、Bio-C和AH Plus。在进行二次化学机械预备和使用荧光素标记的AH Plus进行封闭之前,去除根充材料。进行多次微型计算机断层扫描,随后用共聚焦激光扫描显微镜,使用四种不同方法测量标记封闭剂向牙本质小管内的渗透情况。结果发现,使用渗透百分比法测量封闭剂向根管牙本质内的渗透最为可靠。再治疗期间的牙本质渗透性似乎不受残余根充材料类型的影响。