School of Dentistry of Bauru, University of São Paulo, Bauru, São Paulo, Brazil.
, Iguaí, Brazil.
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Dec;26(12):7143-7148. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04675-8. Epub 2022 Aug 16.
Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) was used to investigate the penetration of endodontic sealers into the dentinal tubules after retreatment using two different obturation techniques.
Thirty mandibular premolars were prepared up to instrument F3 (ProTaper Universal, Dentsply) and filled with Endofill using the single cone technique. The canals were retreated using Mtwo instruments. Reobturation was performed with the Bio-C sealer mixed with a fluorophore dye (Fluo-3) using either the lateral condensation technique (group LC) or the single cone technique (group SC) (n = 15). Teeth were sectioned 2, 4, and 6 mm from the apex and analyzed with CLSM to assess the penetration of the sealer into the canal perimeter and the maximum depth of penetration of the sealer into the dentinal tubules. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and the Student-t and Holm-Sidak tests.
In the apical segment, the penetrated perimeter was significantly higher in the LC group than in the SC group (p < 0.05); no significant difference was found in the middle and cervical segments (p > 0.05). In terms of penetration depth, no significant differences were found for any of the segments studied (p > 0.05).
The LC technique promoted a higher percentage of canal circumference penetrated by the sealer than the SC technique in the apical segment after endodontic retreatment.
CLSM demonstrated that the LC technique promoted a higher percentage of canal perimeter penetrated by the Bio-C sealer than the SC technique in the apical segment of mandibular premolars after retreatment.
利用共聚焦激光扫描显微镜(CLSM)研究两种不同的根管充填技术在根管再治疗后牙本质小管内牙胶密封剂的渗透情况。
30 颗下颌前磨牙预备至 F3 锉(ProTaper Universal,Dentsply)并用 Endofill 单尖器械充填。使用 Mtwo 器械进行根管再治疗。使用 Bio-C 密封剂混合荧光染料(Fluo-3),分别采用侧向加压技术(LC 组)和单尖器械技术(SC 组)(n=15)进行再充填。从根尖 2、4 和 6mm 处将牙齿切片,并用 CLSM 分析评估密封剂进入根管周界的渗透情况和密封剂进入牙本质小管的最大渗透深度。采用 ANOVA 分析和 Student-t 和 Holm-Sidak 检验进行数据分析。
根尖段,LC 组的渗透周界明显高于 SC 组(p<0.05);中颈段无显著差异(p>0.05)。在渗透深度方面,各研究段均无显著差异(p>0.05)。
根管再治疗后,LC 技术比 SC 技术在根尖段更能提高牙胶密封剂渗透的根管周界百分比。
CLSM 显示,根管再治疗后,LC 技术比 SC 技术在下颌前磨牙根尖段更能提高 Bio-C 牙胶密封剂渗透的根管周界百分比。