• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

虚假记忆文献中的开放科学实践。

Open science practices in the false memory literature.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Psychology, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.

出版信息

Memory. 2024 Sep;32(8):1115-1127. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2024.2387108. Epub 2024 Aug 5.

DOI:10.1080/09658211.2024.2387108
PMID:39101456
Abstract

In response to the replication crisis in psychology, the scientific community has advocated open science practices to promote transparency and reproducibility. Although existing reviews indicate inconsistent and generally low adoption of open science in psychology, a current-day, detailed analysis is lacking. Recognising the significant impact of false memory research in legal contexts, we conducted a preregistered systematic review to assess the integration of open science practices within this field, analysing 388 publications from 2015 to 2023 (including 15 replications and 3 meta-analyses). Our findings indicated a significant yet varied adoption of open science practices. Most studies (86.86%) adhered to at least one measure, with publication accessibility being the most consistently adopted practice at 73.97%. While data sharing demonstrated the most substantial growth, reaching about 75% by 2023, preregistration and analysis script sharing lagged, with 20-25% adoption in 2023. This review highlights a promising trend towards enhanced research quality, transparency, and reproducibility in false memory research. However, the inconsistent implementation of open science practices may still challenge the verification, replication, and interpretation of research findings. Our study underscores the need for a comprehensive adoption of open science to improve research reliability and validity substantially, fostering trust and credibility in psychology.

摘要

针对心理学领域的复制危机,科学界倡导采用开放科学实践,以提高透明度和可重复性。尽管现有研究表明心理学领域对开放科学的采用程度不一致且普遍较低,但目前缺乏详细的分析。鉴于虚假记忆研究在法律环境中的重大影响,我们进行了一项预先注册的系统评价,以评估该领域内开放科学实践的整合情况,分析了 2015 年至 2023 年的 388 篇出版物(包括 15 项复制研究和 3 项荟萃分析)。我们的研究结果表明,开放科学实践的采用程度虽然显著,但存在差异。大多数研究(86.86%)至少采用了一项措施,其中出版物可获取性是最一致采用的实践,达到了 73.97%。虽然数据共享的增长最为显著,到 2023 年达到了约 75%,但预注册和分析脚本共享的采用程度滞后,2023 年仅为 20-25%。这项综述突显了虚假记忆研究在提高研究质量、透明度和可重复性方面的积极趋势。然而,开放科学实践的不一致实施仍可能对研究结果的验证、复制和解释构成挑战。我们的研究强调了全面采用开放科学以大幅提高研究可靠性和有效性的必要性,从而增强心理学领域的信任和可信度。

相似文献

1
Open science practices in the false memory literature.虚假记忆文献中的开放科学实践。
Memory. 2024 Sep;32(8):1115-1127. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2024.2387108. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
2
Estimating the Prevalence of Transparency and Reproducibility-Related Research Practices in Psychology (2014-2017).心理学领域透明度和可重复性相关研究实践的流行度评估(2014-2017)。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2022 Jan;17(1):239-251. doi: 10.1177/1745691620979806. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
3
Developing an open science 'mindset'.培养开放科学的“思维模式”。
Health Psychol Behav Med. 2021 Dec 26;10(1):1-21. doi: 10.1080/21642850.2021.2012474. eCollection 2022.
4
Measuring transparency in the social sciences: political science and international relations.衡量社会科学中的透明度:政治学与国际关系
R Soc Open Sci. 2024 Jul 3;11(7):240313. doi: 10.1098/rsos.240313. eCollection 2024 Jul.
5
'One size doesn't fit all': Lessons from interaction analysis on tailoring Open Science practices to qualitative research.“一刀切”不适用:从互动分析中学到的将开放科学实践定制到定性研究中的经验。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2023 Oct;62(4):1590-1604. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12568. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
6
The State of Open Science Practices in Psychometric Studies of Suicide: A Systematic Review.《自杀心理测量研究中开放科学实践的现状:系统评价》。
Assessment. 2024 Dec;31(8):1567-1579. doi: 10.1177/10731911241236315. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
7
Evaluating Research Transparency and Openness in Communication Sciences and Disorders Journals.评估传播科学与障碍期刊中的研究透明度和开放性。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2023 Jun 20;66(6):1977-1985. doi: 10.1044/2022_JSLHR-22-00330. Epub 2022 Dec 14.
8
Clearinghouse Standards of Evidence on the Transparency, Openness, and Reproducibility of Intervention Evaluations.干预评估的透明度、开放性和可重复性的文献资源中心证据标准。
Prev Sci. 2022 Jul;23(5):774-786. doi: 10.1007/s11121-021-01284-x. Epub 2021 Aug 6.
9
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
10
Towards the enhancement of quality publication practices in clinical psychological science.朝向临床心理学科学中提升优质出版实践。
Behav Res Ther. 2020 Jan;124:103499. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2019.103499. Epub 2019 Oct 26.

引用本文的文献

1
A sharing practices review of the visual search and eye movements literature reveals recommendations for our field and others.对视觉搜索和眼动文献的共享实践回顾为我们这个领域及其他领域提供了建议。
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Jul 25;57(9):235. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02759-3.