Suppr超能文献

阑尾切除术:残端内翻与单纯结扎的评估:一项前瞻性随机试验。

Appendicectomy: assessment of stump invagination versus simple ligation: a prospective, randomized trial.

作者信息

Engström L, Fenyö G

出版信息

Br J Surg. 1985 Dec;72(12):971-2. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800721212.

Abstract

The appendix stump was ligated and doubly invaginated in 374 patients and was simply ligated in 361 in a prospective, randomized trial of 735 consecutive appendicectomies. The two groups were similar with respect to sex, age, degree of appendiceal inflammation and antibiotic treatment. The incidence of wound infection and postoperative pyrexia and the postoperative hospital stay showed no significant intergroup difference. The median operating time was slightly shorter in the group without invagination. Simple ligation facilitates and shortens appendicectomy. It produces no deformation of the caecal wall that subsequently may be mistaken for a caecal neoplasm. Simple ligation is therefore recommended as standard procedure in appendicectomy.

摘要

在一项对735例连续阑尾切除术的前瞻性随机试验中,374例患者的阑尾残端进行了结扎并双重内翻,361例患者仅进行了结扎。两组在性别、年龄、阑尾炎症程度和抗生素治疗方面相似。伤口感染、术后发热的发生率以及术后住院时间在组间无显著差异。未进行内翻的组中位手术时间略短。单纯结扎便于并缩短阑尾切除术。它不会导致盲肠壁变形,否则随后可能被误诊为盲肠肿瘤。因此,建议单纯结扎作为阑尾切除术的标准操作。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验