Suppr超能文献

阑尾切除术:残端内翻与单纯结扎的评估:一项前瞻性随机试验。

Appendicectomy: assessment of stump invagination versus simple ligation: a prospective, randomized trial.

作者信息

Engström L, Fenyö G

出版信息

Br J Surg. 1985 Dec;72(12):971-2. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800721212.

Abstract

The appendix stump was ligated and doubly invaginated in 374 patients and was simply ligated in 361 in a prospective, randomized trial of 735 consecutive appendicectomies. The two groups were similar with respect to sex, age, degree of appendiceal inflammation and antibiotic treatment. The incidence of wound infection and postoperative pyrexia and the postoperative hospital stay showed no significant intergroup difference. The median operating time was slightly shorter in the group without invagination. Simple ligation facilitates and shortens appendicectomy. It produces no deformation of the caecal wall that subsequently may be mistaken for a caecal neoplasm. Simple ligation is therefore recommended as standard procedure in appendicectomy.

摘要

在一项对735例连续阑尾切除术的前瞻性随机试验中,374例患者的阑尾残端进行了结扎并双重内翻,361例患者仅进行了结扎。两组在性别、年龄、阑尾炎症程度和抗生素治疗方面相似。伤口感染、术后发热的发生率以及术后住院时间在组间无显著差异。未进行内翻的组中位手术时间略短。单纯结扎便于并缩短阑尾切除术。它不会导致盲肠壁变形,否则随后可能被误诊为盲肠肿瘤。因此,建议单纯结扎作为阑尾切除术的标准操作。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验