Suppr超能文献

阑尾切除术中单纯结扎与残端内翻术的比较

Simple ligation vs stump inversion in appendicectomy.

作者信息

Lavonius M I, Liesjärvi S, Niskanen R O, Ristkari S K, Korkala O, Mokka R E

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Päijät-Häme Central Hospital, Finland.

出版信息

Ann Chir Gynaecol. 1996;85(3):222-4.

PMID:8950444
Abstract

Although modern gastrointestinal surgery has abandoned the invagination of stapler closures, the traditional technique for appendicectomy with appendix stump invagination is still in common use. In a prospective study altogether 200 patients operated on for acute appendicitis were treated either by simple ligation or ligation and inversion of the appendix stump. The complication rates between the two groups were equal. Thus, we recommend the simple ligation technique for conventional as well as for laparoscopic appendicectomy because it is simpler and faster, and it preserves the intact anatomy of the caecal wall.

摘要

尽管现代胃肠外科手术已摒弃了吻合器闭合的内翻术,但传统的阑尾残端内翻式阑尾切除术仍在普遍使用。在一项前瞻性研究中,总共200例接受急性阑尾炎手术的患者,分别采用单纯结扎或阑尾残端结扎并内翻的方法进行治疗。两组之间的并发症发生率相同。因此,我们推荐在传统阑尾切除术以及腹腔镜阑尾切除术中采用单纯结扎技术,因为它更简单、更快,并且能保留盲肠壁的完整解剖结构。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验