Suppr超能文献

比较不同快速气相色谱-质谱联用技术(冷电子电离、串联质谱和高分辨质谱)在食品中拟除虫菊酯类农药残留分析中的应用。

Comparison of different fast gas chromatography - mass spectrometry techniques (Cold EI, MS/MS, and HRMS) for the analysis of pyrethroid insecticide residues in food.

机构信息

U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Eastern Regional Research Center, 600 East Mermaid Lane, Wyndmoor, PA 19038, USA.

School of Chemistry, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel.

出版信息

Anal Methods. 2024 Aug 15;16(32):5599-5618. doi: 10.1039/d4ay00858h.

Abstract

In the multiclass, multiresidue analysis of pesticides in food and environmental samples, pyrethroid insecticides are generally more difficult to analyze than other types of analytes. They do not ionize well by electrospray ionization, and although they are suitable for analysis by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), selectivity using standard electron ionization (EI) in GC-MS is often insufficient because the molecular ion is rarely present. Many pyrethroids tend to have the same fragment ions in MS or high-resolution (HR)MS, and similar ion transitions in tandem MS/MS, leading to difficulties in distinguishing different pyrethroids from each other and chemical interferences in complex matrices. In this study, different forms of fast GC coupled with different types of MS detectors were compared for the analysis of up to 15 pyrethroids in barley extracts as a test case to assess which approach was the most advantageous. The three studied GC-MS techniques consisted of Cold EI using supersonic molecular beams in selected ion monitoring (SIM) mode with a single quadrupole instrument; triple quadrupole MS/MS; and HRMS using an orbital ion trap (orbitrap). A higher flow rate was used in Cold EI, and low pressure (LP) GC was employed in the MS/MS and orbitrap methods, to speed up the GC analyses (<10 min chromatograms in all cases). Each technique had some advantages over the others depending on specific pyrethroid analytes in the matrix. Nontargeted LPGC-orbitrap typically yielded the highest selectivity, but it rarely achieved the needed detectability to quantidentify the residues at 10 ng g. Cold EI-SIM and LPGC-MS/MS usually met the needed detection limits and generally achieved similar capabilities for the targeted pyrethroids.

摘要

在食品和环境样品中多类、多残留的农药分析中,拟除虫菊酯类杀虫剂通常比其他类型的分析物更难分析。它们通过电喷雾电离不易离子化,虽然适合气相色谱-质谱联用 (GC-MS) 分析,但 GC-MS 中标准电子电离 (EI) 的选择性通常不足,因为分子离子很少存在。许多拟除虫菊酯在 MS 或高分辨率 (HR)MS 中往往具有相同的碎片离子,在串联 MS/MS 中具有相似的离子跃迁,这导致难以相互区分不同的拟除虫菊酯和复杂基质中的化学干扰。在这项研究中,比较了不同形式的快速气相色谱与不同类型的 MS 检测器,以分析大麦提取物中的多达 15 种拟除虫菊酯,以评估哪种方法最有利。研究的三种 GC-MS 技术包括在选择离子监测 (SIM) 模式下使用超音速分子束的冷 EI,具有单个四极杆仪器;三重四极杆 MS/MS;以及使用轨道离子阱 (orbitrap) 的 HRMS。冷 EI 中使用了更高的流速,而 MS/MS 和 orbitrap 方法中使用了低压 (LP) GC,以加快 GC 分析速度(所有情况下的色谱图均小于 10 分钟)。每种技术都根据基质中的特定拟除虫菊酯分析物在某些方面具有优势。非靶向 LPGC-orbitrap 通常具有最高的选择性,但很少达到需要的检测限,无法定量识别 10 ng g 的残留量。冷 EI-SIM 和 LPGC-MS/MS 通常满足所需的检测限,并且通常对目标拟除虫菊酯具有相似的检测能力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验